31.10.2012 Views

Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...

Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...

Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

After <strong>the</strong> statement <strong>of</strong> defense is submitted, additional briefs may<br />

subsequently be exchanged, or <strong>the</strong> court may order a hear<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong><br />

parties to appear <strong>in</strong> person. The purpose <strong>of</strong> such hear<strong>in</strong>g usually is<br />

threefold: for <strong>the</strong> parties (i) to supply <strong>in</strong>formation to <strong>the</strong> court, (iii) to<br />

argue <strong>the</strong>ir case before <strong>the</strong> court and (iii) to attempt to reach a<br />

settlement.<br />

The parties’ briefs are filed at a docket session, which is a district<br />

court session held specifically for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> fil<strong>in</strong>g briefs and<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g formal procedural requests. After <strong>the</strong> briefs have been<br />

exchanged, a hear<strong>in</strong>g for oral arguments before <strong>the</strong> court may be held<br />

if ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parties so requires. If <strong>the</strong>re has already been an<br />

opportunity for oral argument dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g mentioned above, <strong>the</strong><br />

court may deny a request for oral argument.<br />

Appeal proceed<strong>in</strong>gs are <strong>in</strong>itiated by <strong>the</strong> service <strong>of</strong> a notice <strong>of</strong> appeal<br />

(with<strong>in</strong> three months from <strong>the</strong> district court’s judgment). In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple,<br />

only two briefs are exchanged. In <strong>the</strong> appellant’s brief, <strong>the</strong> party fil<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> appeal expla<strong>in</strong>s why it disagrees with <strong>the</strong> judgment passed <strong>in</strong> first<br />

<strong>in</strong>stance. The opponent may file an answer, which is <strong>of</strong>ten followed<br />

by a hear<strong>in</strong>g for oral arguments. The appeal is heard by a three judge<br />

panel.<br />

The course <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, both <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first <strong>in</strong>stance and on appeal,<br />

may be complicated by several motions on procedural issues (such as<br />

a motion on jurisdiction) and/or by order<strong>in</strong>g witnesses exam<strong>in</strong>ations<br />

or expert op<strong>in</strong>ions.<br />

24.3 Summary Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

In urgent cases, a judge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> district court may sit <strong>in</strong> summary<br />

proceed<strong>in</strong>gs to provide provisional relief. There are few restrictions<br />

on <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> dispute that may be heard. Summary proceed<strong>in</strong>gs are<br />

even used to obta<strong>in</strong> a payment order for essentially undisputed claims.<br />

Summary proceed<strong>in</strong>gs are usually done with dispatch. At <strong>the</strong><br />

pla<strong>in</strong>tiff’s request, <strong>the</strong> court will schedule a date for <strong>the</strong> summary<br />

256 Baker & McKenzie

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!