31.10.2012 Views

Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...

Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...

Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Do<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands <strong>2012</strong><br />

UWV. Consequently, dissolution proceed<strong>in</strong>gs serve as an alternative,<br />

which – depend<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> circumstances – can be preferred to a UWV<br />

procedure.<br />

The Cantonal Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> competent court will dissolve <strong>the</strong><br />

employment contract only if <strong>the</strong>re is a ‘serious cause’. A serious<br />

cause may be an ‘urgent cause’ (i.e., reasons as described above) or a<br />

‘change <strong>in</strong> circumstances’ which justifies dissolution.<br />

Dissolution may be requested regardless whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> contract is fixedterm<br />

or entered <strong>in</strong>to for an <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite period and even if <strong>the</strong> employee<br />

is (for example) pregnant or sick. In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, pregnancy and<br />

sickness prohibit <strong>the</strong> employer from giv<strong>in</strong>g notice. However, even <strong>in</strong><br />

dissolution proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>the</strong> employer must be able to prove that <strong>the</strong><br />

request for dissolution is not <strong>in</strong> any way related to <strong>the</strong> employee’s<br />

pregnancy or illness (or – for that matter – any o<strong>the</strong>r statutory<br />

prohibition to give notice). Failure to meet this requirement can – <strong>in</strong> a<br />

worst case scenario – results <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> court deny<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> request for<br />

dissolution.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> term<strong>in</strong>ation based on a change <strong>in</strong> circumstances, <strong>the</strong><br />

competent court may decide to award compensation to <strong>the</strong> employee<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> reasonableness. Whe<strong>the</strong>r such compensation<br />

is awarded and how much is awarded depends on several<br />

circumstances (e.g., <strong>the</strong> employee’s age, position, future prospects,<br />

number <strong>of</strong> years <strong>of</strong> employment). Courts commonly use <strong>the</strong><br />

“Cantonal Court Formula” <strong>in</strong> calculat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> severance pay: A<br />

x B x C, where A is <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> weighed years <strong>of</strong> service, B is <strong>the</strong><br />

average gross monthly salary (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g several fixed emoluments)<br />

and C is <strong>the</strong> “adjustment factor.”<br />

Until 1 January 2009, factor (A), <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> weighed years <strong>of</strong><br />

service, was calculated as follows: each year <strong>of</strong> service worked until<br />

<strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> 40 counted as 1; each year <strong>of</strong> service between <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> 40<br />

and 50 counted as 1.5 and each year <strong>of</strong> service after <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> 50<br />

counted as 2.<br />

Baker & McKenzie 125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!