Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...
Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...
Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Do<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands <strong>2012</strong><br />
Cooperative is <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple not subject to Dutch dividend withhold<strong>in</strong>g<br />
tax. (we refer to 18.1.6)<br />
18.4.8 Hybrid Instruments<br />
Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> participation exemption applies to proceeds from hybrid<br />
debt <strong>in</strong>struments <strong>in</strong> cross-border situations used to be cont<strong>in</strong>gent on<br />
<strong>the</strong> requirement that <strong>the</strong>se proceeds were non-deductible at <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> debtor. The rationale <strong>of</strong> this requirement was <strong>the</strong> prevention <strong>of</strong><br />
double dip structures result<strong>in</strong>g from mismatches <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> classification<br />
<strong>of</strong> debt <strong>in</strong>struments <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> jurisdictions <strong>in</strong>volved. The abolishment <strong>of</strong><br />
this condition and <strong>the</strong> extension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participation exemption regime<br />
to hybrid <strong>in</strong>struments with certa<strong>in</strong> characteristics might result <strong>in</strong><br />
double dip structures allow<strong>in</strong>g a Dutch parent company to derive<br />
exempt benefits from <strong>in</strong>struments, whereas <strong>the</strong> remuneration on <strong>the</strong><br />
hybrid <strong>in</strong>strument is deductible <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country <strong>of</strong> issuance.<br />
18.4.9 Real Estate Companies<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>the</strong> amendments <strong>in</strong> 2007 to <strong>the</strong> participation exemption<br />
regime with respect to real estate companies were particularly<br />
favorable. If more than 90% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsidiary (on a<br />
consolidated basis) consists <strong>of</strong> real estate and that real estate is not<br />
directly or <strong>in</strong>directly owned by a fiscal <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong>stitution, <strong>the</strong><br />
participation exemption would apply, provided that <strong>the</strong> parent<br />
company holds at least 5% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shares <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsidiary. This “90%<br />
test” must be considered on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsidiary’s consolidated<br />
balance sheet, with <strong>in</strong>tercompany receivables and debts be<strong>in</strong>g set <strong>of</strong>f<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st each o<strong>the</strong>r, mean<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>y will not have any effect on <strong>the</strong><br />
m<strong>in</strong>imum real estate percentage.<br />
The value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assets must be determ<strong>in</strong>ed on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir fair<br />
market value. For <strong>the</strong> years 2007–2009, it is <strong>the</strong>refore important to<br />
separate, as far as possible, real estate <strong>in</strong>vestments from bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
activities such as property management. If this is done properly, both<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment activities (real estate <strong>in</strong>vestment) and <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
activities will qualify for <strong>the</strong> participation exemption.<br />
Baker & McKenzie 175