31.10.2012 Views

Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...

Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...

Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Do<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands <strong>2012</strong><br />

� The VBI is set up as an open-end <strong>in</strong>vestment fund, mean<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

<strong>the</strong> fund should allow <strong>the</strong> repurchase <strong>of</strong> shares at regular<br />

moments.<br />

� The VBI regime is stricter <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> allowable activities.<br />

For <strong>in</strong>stance, it may <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> so-called “f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

<strong>in</strong>struments” only as def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> MiFID, e.g., shares,<br />

bonds, options, futures, swaps. It is also allowed to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong><br />

Dutch and foreign real estate <strong>in</strong>directly, i.e., via a (nontransparent)<br />

Dutch or foreign entity or a real estate <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

fund. In addition, it may <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> foreign real estate through<br />

a transparent or non-transparent entity or partnership; <strong>the</strong><br />

limitation <strong>the</strong>n is focused only on Dutch real estate.<br />

Please note that due to <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> tax treaty protection, withhold<strong>in</strong>g<br />

tax levied by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestor country will be actual costs for <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment fund. Interest-bear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestments (<strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> dividendgenerat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestments) are <strong>the</strong>refore most <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g, s<strong>in</strong>ce less<br />

countries levy <strong>in</strong>terest withhold<strong>in</strong>g tax.<br />

� The VBI has no specific shareholder requirements; both<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals, corporations, as well as <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>in</strong>vestors<br />

may <strong>in</strong>vest via a VBI. However, a decree was published on<br />

10 March 2008 <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance tightened <strong>the</strong><br />

possibilities for substantial shareholders to “misuse” <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment regime. It becomes clear from <strong>the</strong> decree that <strong>the</strong><br />

Dutch tax authorities would not easily approve <strong>the</strong> request to<br />

qualify as a VBI if <strong>the</strong> VBI was ma<strong>in</strong>ly set up as an exempt<br />

fund for (effectively) only one shareholder.<br />

� The VBI should be diversify<strong>in</strong>g risks, mean<strong>in</strong>g, it could not<br />

<strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> one asset only (apart from feeder funds).<br />

The VBI regime does not have any distribution obligations. However,<br />

Dutch (corporate and <strong>in</strong>dividual) <strong>in</strong>vestors do have to revaluate <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest to fair market value every year, as a result <strong>of</strong> which <strong>the</strong><br />

Baker & McKenzie 197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!