í´ì¸ M&Aì ë²ì ìì - Sullivan & Cromwell
í´ì¸ M&Aì ë²ì ìì - Sullivan & Cromwell
í´ì¸ M&Aì ë²ì ìì - Sullivan & Cromwell
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2.4 Public Companies<br />
continued<br />
d) Key Rules of Tender Offers<br />
Offers cannot open before the AMF has reviewed their terms and<br />
documentation<br />
The undertakings of the bidder to pay the offer consideration must be<br />
guaranteed by at least one financial sponsor; as a result, bidders must in<br />
practice provide the sponsor with a counter-guarantee (e.g. cash deposit, first<br />
demand bank guarantee, credit facilities with “certain funds” provisions)<br />
Many offers launched by non EU bidders, even unsolicited offers, have<br />
already been successful in France:<br />
- Whether a tender offer is approved or rejected by the board of directors of the target company will<br />
not necessarily make a fundamental difference as to its chances of success: friendly deals have<br />
already failed; hostile offers have already been successful<br />
- The government does not have a lot of means to bar a tender offer<br />
Takeover defenses other than white knight interventions require shareholders<br />
approval; such approval:<br />
- if obtained outside an offer period, will become legally ineffective against an offer launched by a<br />
bidder whose board of directors would be prohibited to frustrate an offer without its own shareholders‘<br />
approval;<br />
- has proven increasingly difficult to obtain year after year as a result of the reluctance, and growing<br />
influence, of proxy advisors<br />
89