03.09.2014 Views

해외 M&A의 법적 쟁점 - Sullivan & Cromwell

해외 M&A의 법적 쟁점 - Sullivan & Cromwell

해외 M&A의 법적 쟁점 - Sullivan & Cromwell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.4 Public Companies<br />

continued<br />

d) Key Rules of Tender Offers<br />

Offers cannot open before the AMF has reviewed their terms and<br />

documentation<br />

The undertakings of the bidder to pay the offer consideration must be<br />

guaranteed by at least one financial sponsor; as a result, bidders must in<br />

practice provide the sponsor with a counter-guarantee (e.g. cash deposit, first<br />

demand bank guarantee, credit facilities with “certain funds” provisions)<br />

Many offers launched by non EU bidders, even unsolicited offers, have<br />

already been successful in France:<br />

- Whether a tender offer is approved or rejected by the board of directors of the target company will<br />

not necessarily make a fundamental difference as to its chances of success: friendly deals have<br />

already failed; hostile offers have already been successful<br />

- The government does not have a lot of means to bar a tender offer<br />

Takeover defenses other than white knight interventions require shareholders<br />

approval; such approval:<br />

- if obtained outside an offer period, will become legally ineffective against an offer launched by a<br />

bidder whose board of directors would be prohibited to frustrate an offer without its own shareholders‘<br />

approval;<br />

- has proven increasingly difficult to obtain year after year as a result of the reluctance, and growing<br />

influence, of proxy advisors<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!