05.10.2014 Views

Annona Species Monograph.pdf - Crops for the Future

Annona Species Monograph.pdf - Crops for the Future

Annona Species Monograph.pdf - Crops for the Future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 10. Agronomy<br />

<strong>Annona</strong> species<br />

Time of<br />

Storage<br />

(days)<br />

Time of<br />

Germination<br />

(days)<br />

Germination<br />

(%)<br />

Age <strong>for</strong><br />

Transplant<br />

(days)<br />

Age <strong>for</strong><br />

Grafting<br />

(days)<br />

(A. squamosa)<br />

Source: Hernandez (1983).<br />

Irregular germination is due to different levels and types of dormancy (Pinto,<br />

1975 a, b; Ferreira et al., 1997; de Smet et al., 1999; Ferreira et al., 1999;<br />

Hernández et al., 1999; Moreno Andrade, 1999). Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong>re still<br />

exists disagreement about <strong>the</strong> presence of dormancy in <strong>Annona</strong> seeds and <strong>the</strong><br />

correct treatments to overcome it. Sanewski (1991) claimed that no<br />

dormancy exists, whereas o<strong>the</strong>r authors claim <strong>the</strong> presence of dormancy<br />

(Hayat, 1963; Purohit, 1995; Ferreira et al., 1999; Hernández et al., 1999). A<br />

possible hypo<strong>the</strong>sis to explain this disagreement among authors is <strong>the</strong> degree<br />

of seed maturity when tested and <strong>the</strong> fact that dormancy can be induced by<br />

environmental factors ra<strong>the</strong>r than being innate. Many of <strong>the</strong> comparisons<br />

below do not give data on how <strong>the</strong> seed was handled and what conditions it<br />

was kept in be<strong>for</strong>e testing; hence measures of viability and/or germination<br />

results may not be truly comparable.<br />

Pre-treatment of <strong>Annona</strong> seeds is very important and can be physical, such as<br />

seed scarification and water immersion to reduce or eliminate <strong>the</strong><br />

impermeability of <strong>the</strong> seed coat, or chemical, such as gibberellic acid (GA) to<br />

counteract endogenous germination inhibitors (Campbell and Popenoe, 1968;<br />

Hartmann et al., 1990; de Smet et al., 1999). Duarte et al. (1974) found that<br />

dry cherimoya seeds treated with GA at 10,000 ppm significantly increased<br />

<strong>the</strong> seed germination to around 70%, compared with 57% <strong>for</strong> untreated seed,<br />

while hot water showed an adverse effect on seed germination (28%).<br />

Pittman (1956) suggested that cherimoya seeds must be soaked in water <strong>for</strong> 3<br />

to 4 days and <strong>the</strong>n sown in warm soil, after which <strong>the</strong>y will start to germinate<br />

in 4 to 5 weeks.<br />

Castillo Alcopar et al. (1997) found that germination capacity of cherimoya<br />

seed varied from 66 to 94% and period of germination varied between 58 and<br />

69 days after planting. They found that seed scarification had only a slight<br />

influence on germination. Significantly, all physiological responses were<br />

genotype dependent. De Smet et al. (1999) evaluated germination percentage<br />

and rate in cherimoya using different pre-treatments, such as soaking in<br />

different concentrations of GA (extreme values of 500 and 10,000 ppm),<br />

soaking <strong>for</strong> different periods (12-72 hours) in distilled water, and chemical<br />

scarification with sulphuric acid. They found that GA showed a positive<br />

effect on both physiological parameters.<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!