Educational Finance in Thailand - UNESCO Bangkok
Educational Finance in Thailand - UNESCO Bangkok
Educational Finance in Thailand - UNESCO Bangkok
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
F<strong>in</strong>al Report, Volume II/3 Anthony. Cresswell: <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>F<strong>in</strong>ance</strong> <strong>UNESCO</strong>-PROAP TA 2996-THA<br />
Education Management and <strong>F<strong>in</strong>ance</strong> Study July 1999<br />
Table 2 - SSPL policy matrix conditionalities<br />
To be completed Prior to Feb., 1998<br />
1. Increase budget for student loans to B17,100 million<br />
2. Ensure female students benefit equitably from loan program<br />
3. Establish monitor<strong>in</strong>g for science, math, and foreign language teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />
4. Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>structional material budget for science, math & foreign language at FY 97 levels<br />
5. Control hir<strong>in</strong>g of primary teachers to br<strong>in</strong>g student/teacher ratio to 25:1<br />
6. Government confirms plans for higher ed. Institutions to manage non-salary budget by 2000<br />
7. Government allow all higher ed. <strong>in</strong>stitutions to reallocate 5% of budget between items<br />
8. Government ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> budget share of primary and secondary funds outside <strong>Bangkok</strong> at pre FY97 levels<br />
9. Amend Human Resource Development Fund regulations to allow access from private schools<br />
To be completed prior to March, 1999<br />
1. Cab<strong>in</strong>et approve draft law for <strong>in</strong>dependent school <strong>in</strong>spection and performance based management<br />
2. Increase budget to general secondary relative to vocational education by 5%<br />
3. Reduce ratio of public upper sec. voc. ed. Enrollments to total public upper sec. to 1990 level, over 1998-2001<br />
4. Cab<strong>in</strong>et approve draft law for teacher personnel and salary system for local employment<br />
5. Cab<strong>in</strong>et approve draft law to reduce staff at MOE by at least 25%<br />
6. Universities granted authority to manage non-salary current budget<br />
7. Cab<strong>in</strong>et approve draft law for phased delegation of selected management functions to local schools<br />
8. Delegate to vocational school and skill centers authority and responsibility for program, personnel, and f<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
9. Confirm commitment to make all public universities autonomous by 2002; one by 1998<br />
10. Cab<strong>in</strong>et adopt policy to avoid crowd<strong>in</strong>g out private schools, equitable regulation, and set own fees<br />
Source: Asian Development Bank Loan Program Report, p. 56-57<br />
b. All of the conditionalities <strong>in</strong> the SSPL have some budget implications, but they<br />
vary considerably <strong>in</strong> their relevance to this review. The items to be completed<br />
prior to Feb., 1998 predate the activities of this review and therefore represent a<br />
base of completed policy or budget action on which to base analysis or<br />
recommendations, or <strong>in</strong> some cases are relevant to other components of this<br />
project and are treated there. 10 Among the items due for completion <strong>in</strong> March,<br />
1999, several are major education f<strong>in</strong>ance concerns. Two of the items <strong>in</strong>volve<br />
specific budget allocations or related decisions: reduction of MOE staff by 25 per<br />
cent, and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the general vs. vocations education budget ratio. The item<br />
call<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>dependent school <strong>in</strong>spection and performance-based management,<br />
while arguable l<strong>in</strong>ked to efficiency concerns, is not a f<strong>in</strong>ance matter and is<br />
therefore outside the scope of this review. Five of the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g items <strong>in</strong>volve<br />
delegation of f<strong>in</strong>ancial decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g authority to the local school or campus,<br />
and thus will change the budget process <strong>in</strong> fundamental ways. This is a shared<br />
concern of this review and the decentralization component, and so will be<br />
discussed <strong>in</strong> both reports. The call for policy changes relative to private school<br />
operations and f<strong>in</strong>ance will be discussed <strong>in</strong> the sections deal<strong>in</strong>g specifically with<br />
private education.<br />
10<br />
Policies and budget actions respect<strong>in</strong>g the student loan program are discussed <strong>in</strong> the separate report on<br />
that subject (see Vol. II/4). The matters deal<strong>in</strong>g with decentralization and devolution of f<strong>in</strong>ancial authority<br />
are to some extent <strong>in</strong> this review and also <strong>in</strong> the decentralization report (see Vol.II/1).<br />
33