Educational Finance in Thailand - UNESCO Bangkok

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Final Report, Volume II/3 Anthony. Cresswell: Educational Finance UNESCO-PROAP TA 2996-THA Education Management and Finance Study July 1999 compared to 36.3 at the lower secondary and 35.9 at the upper secondary level. This represents an over 50 per cent higher staffing ratio for the lower level, which easily accounts for the budget differences. Table 8 - Budget allocation by level and expenditure type, 1998 (million Baht) Level Total Salary Emp Wage Remun. Utilities Capital Subsides Other Pre-prim/Prim 89,113.1 72.5% 0.5% 2.4% 0.5% 3.7% 20.2% 0.1% Secondary 50,311.6 51.5% 0.6% 11.3% 1.0% 22.0% 13.0% 0.6% Academic 34,261.3 59.4% 0.6% 5.8% 0.7% 16.4% 16.7% 0.4% Vocational 14,559.6 34.0% 0.7% 24.35% 1.7% 35.2% 3.1% 1.1% Other 1,490.7 38.7% 0.3% 11.0% 1.0% 21.4% 26.2% 1.4% Higher Educ. 33,986.1 34.9% 0.7% 7.1% 1.8% 36.6% 18.1% 0.8% University 32,159.8 36.7% 0.7% 7.4% 1.9% 38.3% 14.1% 0.9% Non-Degree 227.7 25.5% 2.2% 8.8% 0.2% 50.2% 13.2% 0.0% Other 1,598.5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% No def. By 2,940.9 30.9% 8.5% 35.4% 1.6% 15.9% 1.3% 6.5% Level Not Classified 20,633.6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.5% 6.8% 89.7% Misc. 4,722.3 39.7% 0.6% 17.7% 2.8% 14.7% 19.6% 5.0% TOTAL 201,707.6 52.1% 0.6% 6.0% 0.9% 14.2% 16.4% 9.7% d. By contrast, the proportion of salary expense for higher education appears to be lower than would be expected in comparison to other higher education systems. Some of this situation appears to be a consequence of the mix of faculty by rank and qualification in the higher education level. MUA figures show only 11 per cent of public university staff with Ph.D. degrees and over 50 per cent with BA degree or lower. Similarly, the distribution by rank shows 50 per cent of staff at the rank of lecturer and less than 2 per cent at the rank of professor. e. The proportion of capital expenditure in the higher education level is also above what might be expected. Figures in the 10-20 per cent range would be more typical of higher education systems, except those that were undergoing periods of rapid expansion. This has certainly been true of the system in Thailand. Enrollments in higher education increased from 491,956 in 1991 to over 1.1 million in 1997. Better than doubling enrollment in a seven-year period would require substantial capital investment. This is apparently ongoing. But this still does not account for the high levels completely. For comparison, a similar, though somewhat slower expansion was occurring in Malaysia, with the increase from 1991 to 1996 from approximately 600,000 to 1,000,000 university students. Yet the capital expenditure for Malaysian higher education in 1995 was less than 10 per cent. 2.2.2.3. Public versus private schools a. There are marked differences between the expenditures in public versus private schools as well. These differences show that the available financial resources for the private schools in general are below those for the public schools in the basic education levels. (See Table 9 below and Table 7 above.) The total expenditure 58
Final Report, Volume II/3 Anthony. Cresswell: Educational Finance UNESCO-PROAP TA 2996-THA Education Management and Finance Study July 1999 levels for the public and private basic education levels are roughly comparable, with the largest difference between the primary levels, with the private level being approximately 26 per cent above the private, and the Upper secondary private about six per cent below the public. However, the total expenditure levels do not give a complete picture. The recurrent expenditure levels in the public schools are considerably above the private schools, with the reverse being true in the capital expense category. The capital expense levels are roughly equal to the recurrent expense in the private schools, an unusually high proportion for basic education. This is most likely a consequence of lower salary levels in the private schools, greater expense for development and expansion, and possibly higher levels of expenditure on equipment and other capital goods. b. The expenditure figures for the private schools are difficult to interpret due to the variation in the reputation and overall expenditure levels in this sector. Those familiar with the private schools report large variation in the academic quality, reputation, and resources available. Some elite private schools have very high perpupil expenditure levels, while other private schools have resources well below the mean for public schools. The evidence on pupil/teacher ratios in the public schools suggests that the variations among the public schools can be substantial as well. Therefore the relatively close comparisons between public and private schools shown here may be misleading in terms of equity and quality considerations. A more comprehensive analysis of expenditure per head, based on data from individual schools, would allow more precise identification of the areas where low quality and inequities may be serious problems. Such data were not available for this review. Table 9 - Expenditure per head by level and school type Current Exp. Capital Exp. Total Exp. Public Academic per head per head per head Primary 4,962 1,957 6,919 Secondary: Lower 5,933 3,173 9,106 Upper 8,919 3,643 12,562 Vocational 7,934 7,788 15,722 Diploma Rajamongkol Institute 11,082 8,925 20,007 Teacher College 12,943 14,870 27,813 Baccalauriate Rajamongkol Institute 13,567 9,745 23,312 Teachers College (2 yr) 5,319 8,571 13,890 Teachers College (4 yr) 10,592 7,657 18,249 Closed University 31,443 30,888 62,331 Open University 3,943 2,586 6,529 Private Academic Primary 3,892 4,821 8,713 Lower Secondary 4,613 4,751 9,364 Upper Secondary 5,993 5,817 11,810 Private University 5,648 4,222 9,870 Source: ONEC, School Finance Study, 1992 59
Page 1 and 2:
- Volume II/3 - Educational Finance
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents A. Executive Summ
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Tables Table 1 Adjustments
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 18 Figure 19 Figure 20 Figur
Page 9 and 10:
Final Report, Volume II/3 Anthony.
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16: Final Report, Volume II/3 Anthony.
Page 65: Final Report, Volume II/3 Anthony.
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
mission and operations. The term
Page 125 and 126:
The information requirements for fi
Page 127 and 128:
Table 1: Continued Dept. Flow of Re
Page 129 and 130:
Table 1: Continued Dept. Flow of Re
Page 131 and 132:
Description and assessment of compu
Page 133 and 134:
Table 3: Existing computer systems
Page 135 and 136:
Table 3: Continued Current existing
Page 137 and 138:
Description of flows of financial i
Page 139 and 140:
(teachers, facilities, etc) if data
Page 141 and 142:
Table 4: Continued. Content of curr
Page 143 and 144:
Table 5: Assessment of information
Page 145 and 146:
An assessment of information system
Page 147 and 148:
general administration, these syste
Page 149 and 150:
Recommendation for IS Most involved
Page 151 and 152:
6. The nation wide implementation.
Page 153 and 154:
References Office of the permanent
Page 155 and 156:
Office of private education commiss
Page 157 and 158:
Interviews 10 September 1998, 9:00-
Page 159 and 160:
Appendix 2 Projections of Costs of
Page 161 and 162:
Projected Cost Increases for Expand
Page 163 and 164:
Identification of Schools for Sampl
Page 165 and 166:
8. Please place an X in a box below
Page 167 and 168:
enrollment as a whole growing at an
Page 169 and 170:
Figure 1: Thailand’s Development
Page 171 and 172:
Table 5: Crude transition rates of
Page 173 and 174:
and level of education, 1993 and 19
Page 175 and 176:
2.31 Questionable quality of educat
Page 177 and 178:
income inequality between agricultu
Page 179 and 180:
4.1.4. The percentages calculated f
Page 181 and 182:
Table 11: Public and Private sector
Page 183 and 184:
4.3.8. As would be expected, unempl
Page 185 and 186:
5.7 The dilemma is to balance the s
Page 187 and 188:
Table 14: Unemployment and Underemp
Page 189 and 190:
there any activities that would be
Page 191 and 192:
References Chalongphob Sussangkarn
Page 193 and 194:
Appendix 6 BMA Voucher Policy A. Lo
Page 195 and 196:
Appendix 7 Finance Allocation Metho
Page 197 and 198:
Appendix 8 Program Structure of the
Page 199 and 200:
Not all possible flows are show, si
Page 201 and 202:
Appendix 11 Results of Regression A
show all

Educational Finance in Thailand - UNESCO Bangkok

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?