Educational Finance in Thailand - UNESCO Bangkok

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Final Report, Volume II/3 Anthony. Cresswell: Educational Finance UNESCO-PROAP TA 2996-THA Education Management and Finance Study July 1999 Figure 13 - Tuition and indirect expenditure on schooling by type of school (1997 survey) Tuition and Indirect Private Expenditure on Schooling by Type of School 1997 Survey 30,000 Expenditure (Baht) 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 Indirect Tuition - Pub. Pre-Prim. Priv. Pre-Prim. Pub. Prim. Priv. Prim. Pub. L.S. Priv. L.S. Pub. U.S. Priv. U.S. Pub. V.E. Priv. V.E. Pub.Tot. Priv.Tot. School Type e. Before a treatment of the policy implications of these expenditure patterns, it is necessary to review the differences between the private expenditure estimates from the ONEC survey and those from the National Social Survey (NSS). The NSS 1996 survey of a sample of all households shows an average monthly education-related expenditure of 450 Baht. Annualized to 5400 Baht, this compares favorably to the results of the ONEC survey, since the NSS sample included households with no children in school. The 1996 average is a 14 per cent increase from the 396 Baht monthly figure reported for 1994. The 450 Baht/month represents approximately 5 percent of total expenditure reported. There was considerable variation among areas of Thailand, from a high of 992 Baht (6.3% of expenditures) in BMA, to a low of 333 Baht (4% of Expenditures) in the Northeast Region. These variations track the overall levels of income in the regions. f. Since the NSS is based on a representative sample of the population, it can be used as the basis for an estimate of the total household-level expenditure on education. The average household size reported in the NSS for 1996 is 3.6 persons, yielding a per capita annual expenditure on education of 1500 Baht. Since the 1990 population of Thailand was 54.5 million, the 1996 population could be estimated at 60 million, yielding a private education expenditure of approximately 90,000 Million Baht, compared to the total Royal Thai Government education budget of a little over 200,000 Million Baht (preliminary estimate). Thus for the households with children in school, the expenditure on education is a major proportion of the total cost, often exceeding the government-funded portion. And for the nation as a whole, the private expenditure adds nearly half as much as the direct government allocation. It is even quite likely that these overall estimates 64
Final Report, Volume II/3 Anthony. Cresswell: Educational Finance UNESCO-PROAP TA 2996-THA Education Management and Finance Study July 1999 understate the total cost to households, which can include substantial opportunity costs resulting from transporting children and helping with schoolwork. These estimates also ignore the value of contributions in kind to the schools, which can be substantial as well. These are discussed in the section dealing with private support to schools(Section 2.3). 2.3.1.2. Private Higher Education Expenditure a. The relative levels of household expenditure on higher education are quite similar to those for basic education. That is, the amounts from private sources are comparable to the government allocations. The average amounts reported for private expenditure are show by type of institution in Table 11 below. Table 11 - Average private expenditure on higher education by type of institution (ONEC survey) Average Number of Type of Institution Expenses Tuition Total Cost Households Min. of Univ. Affairs 27,330 19,171 46,657 2793 Rajabhat 19,634 8,774 28,654 1420 RIT 26,017 16,134 42,085 416 Private 28,352 31,427 58,413 23 Total 24,869 15,495 40,608 4652 These amounts are comparable to, and to some degree above the per head expenditure levels reported by the ONEC for 1994 in Table 9 above. Since the overall expenditure on higher education has increased substantially since 1994, current estimates for the government share are likely to be considerably higher. The only area in which the government share appears to be substantially higher than the private expenditure levels is for the closed universities. The per head government expenditure of over 60,000 Baht reflects a very high level of capital investment; the recurrent cost is closer to the private levels reported in Table 11. Full-time equivalent enrollment data for each type of higher educational institution were not available for this analysis. Since the reported enrollments in higher education include full- and part- time students, accurate per head calculations could not be made with current budget data. 65
Page 1 and 2:
- Volume II/3 - Educational Finance
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents A. Executive Summ
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Tables Table 1 Adjustments
Page 7 and 8:
Figure 18 Figure 19 Figure 20 Figur
Page 9 and 10:
Final Report, Volume II/3 Anthony.
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22: Final Report, Volume II/3 Anthony.
Page 71: Final Report, Volume II/3 Anthony.
Page 123 and 124:
mission and operations. The term
Page 125 and 126:
The information requirements for fi
Page 127 and 128:
Table 1: Continued Dept. Flow of Re
Page 129 and 130:
Table 1: Continued Dept. Flow of Re
Page 131 and 132:
Description and assessment of compu
Page 133 and 134:
Table 3: Existing computer systems
Page 135 and 136:
Table 3: Continued Current existing
Page 137 and 138:
Description of flows of financial i
Page 139 and 140:
(teachers, facilities, etc) if data
Page 141 and 142:
Table 4: Continued. Content of curr
Page 143 and 144:
Table 5: Assessment of information
Page 145 and 146:
An assessment of information system
Page 147 and 148:
general administration, these syste
Page 149 and 150:
Recommendation for IS Most involved
Page 151 and 152:
6. The nation wide implementation.
Page 153 and 154:
References Office of the permanent
Page 155 and 156:
Office of private education commiss
Page 157 and 158:
Interviews 10 September 1998, 9:00-
Page 159 and 160:
Appendix 2 Projections of Costs of
Page 161 and 162:
Projected Cost Increases for Expand
Page 163 and 164:
Identification of Schools for Sampl
Page 165 and 166:
8. Please place an X in a box below
Page 167 and 168:
enrollment as a whole growing at an
Page 169 and 170:
Figure 1: Thailand’s Development
Page 171 and 172:
Table 5: Crude transition rates of
Page 173 and 174:
and level of education, 1993 and 19
Page 175 and 176:
2.31 Questionable quality of educat
Page 177 and 178:
income inequality between agricultu
Page 179 and 180:
4.1.4. The percentages calculated f
Page 181 and 182:
Table 11: Public and Private sector
Page 183 and 184:
4.3.8. As would be expected, unempl
Page 185 and 186:
5.7 The dilemma is to balance the s
Page 187 and 188:
Table 14: Unemployment and Underemp
Page 189 and 190:
there any activities that would be
Page 191 and 192:
References Chalongphob Sussangkarn
Page 193 and 194:
Appendix 6 BMA Voucher Policy A. Lo
Page 195 and 196:
Appendix 7 Finance Allocation Metho
Page 197 and 198:
Appendix 8 Program Structure of the
Page 199 and 200:
Not all possible flows are show, si
Page 201 and 202:
Appendix 11 Results of Regression A
show all

Educational Finance in Thailand - UNESCO Bangkok

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?