20.11.2014 Views

Indpendent Agencies Report - Alb, Ser, Eng.pdf - QKSS

Indpendent Agencies Report - Alb, Ser, Eng.pdf - QKSS

Indpendent Agencies Report - Alb, Ser, Eng.pdf - QKSS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

decision against a person be stayed, i.e. a decision would not be enforced while the Ombudsperson was<br />

investigating the case. 321<br />

During his investigations, the Ombudsperson was authorized to enter and inspect any place where<br />

arrested persons are held in custody and to be present at meetings or hearings involving such persons,<br />

including the right to access and examine files and documents of the interim civil administration and of<br />

any emerging central or local institution. However, the enforcement powers of the Ombudsperson were<br />

still weak as he could not initiate legal proceedings against public authorities, when they would not<br />

cooperate or refused to implement the recommendations issued by the Ombudsperson. Issuing a<br />

recommendation and publishing the violation were the only instruments available to the<br />

Ombudsperson. In the event of non-compliance, the only remedy available to the Ombudsperson was to<br />

address the SRSG, who was not obligated to take action against the public authority that refused to<br />

follow the Ombudsperson’s recommendation.<br />

9. Current Legislation<br />

The legislation governing the Ombudsperson was revised by the UNMIK in February 2006. This is still<br />

the applicable legislation, though it should now be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of the<br />

Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo of 15 June 2008. 322 The independent legal status and the powers<br />

of the Ombudsperson remain almost entirely the same as before. However, under the new regulation,<br />

there is no longer the possibility for the Ombudsperson to conclude agreements with KFOR to extend its<br />

jurisdiction to human rights violations attributable to KFOR. With regards to cases involving the<br />

UNMIK, the Ombudsperson would only have jurisdiction on the basis of a bilateral agreement with the<br />

SRSG (does such an agreement exist or not, mention this). Thus, as of 2006, the jurisdiction of the<br />

Ombudsperson is confined to the Kosovo Institutions, which at that time included the Provisional<br />

Institutions of Self-Government in Kosovo as established by the Constitutional Framework for<br />

Provisional Self-Government in Kosovo in 2001 and which, since Kosovo’s declaration of independence<br />

on 17 February 2008, include the public institutions of the Republic of Kosovo. The Ombudsperson is<br />

vested with a number of new powers, which, however, remain “soft powers”, e.g. to advise Kosovo<br />

Institutions on human rights matters, to make recommendations with regard to legislation and to<br />

prepare reports on the human rights situation in Kosovo. New elements include the right to assess<br />

321 Ibid, Sections 4.6 and 4.10.<br />

322 UNMIK Regulation No. 2006/6 on the Ombudsperson Institution in Kosovo, amended by UNMIK Regulation No.<br />

2007/15.<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!