Income-Generating Activities - Action Against Hunger

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Field handbook • Scientific and Technical Department • First of all the global context of intervention has to be well known and identified. An intervention in a context of high economic exchanges and/or poor economic activities will lead to differences in terms of kit distribution and expectations regarding the possibility to generate incomes for the beneficiaries. • Some communities, very vulnerable, are totally out of the market system and do not have any preoccupation of selling or even earning money. The distribution of kits can be very useful for them anyway in order to improve their food production and therefore their food security but unrealistic in order to obtain regular and significant incomes. Probably another terminology should be more appropriate: Income Generating Programme or Households Food Security Improvement Programmes • Then and especially in case of collective IGA, the community has to be studied in depth in order to understand where we can have the best input and what the objectives to be achieved by this community can be. In a post conflict context as observed in 2003 in some places situated in the Maluku, such kind of programme of assistance is relevant and useful for the population. The suitability of the programme cannot be denied. But it seems fundamental to check the motivation and reasons of the population for the assistance requested as well as to fix reasonable objectives to be achieved for the beneficiary (micro-grants programmes is not an option for the targeted population). The population has to be motivated, not occupied by the reconstruction process and the necessity to harvest food from the gardens. The project has to fit with the economic environment that will determine the type of assistance and the possibility to generate real incomes. This point is very important as this humanitarian assistance takes place in developing and disrupted contexts. INCOME GENERATING ACTIVITIES: A KEY CONCEPT IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SECURTIY 211
➔ APPENDIX 20: EXAMPLE OF A MONITORING SYSTEM Key question Indicator Means of verification Data collection method Frequency Responsible Outcome Logic of intervention Main Objective Is the living standard of the target population improved Main poverty and food security assessments conducted by different national and international agencies, and ACF, in the region are showing a statistical improvement. Baseline survey and other surveys Interviews Baseline questionnaire Coordination meetings surveys Nov-Dec Apr-May Sept-Oct FM, aHoP, HoP, FSC Survey Database Final report Specific Objective Is the food security status improved 610 households have obtained more extra income and/or food production and have improved access to wheat flour to fulfill the household’s basic needs Accountancy book Groups Income table Data collection field visit 1-2/month SE, MS Database Report 610 households eat meat at least once a week Meals with meat during the last week Interview Dec, Feb, Apr, June, Aug, Oct FM, aHoP Database Reports 610 households have a wheat consumption covering their needs Needs for next two months compared to wheat bought during last two months Market information system Interview Analysis Dec, Feb, Apr, June, Aug, Oct FM, aHoP MS Database Reports MIS The expenditures on non food items of the 610 households has increased significantly by the end of the project period Survey Interviews Baseline questionnaire Nov-Dec Apr-May Sept-Oct FM, aHoP Database reports 212 INCOME GENERATING ACTIVITIES: A KEY CONCEPT IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SECURTIY
Page 1 and 2:
Field handbook • Scientific and T
Page 3 and 4:
Edit: Action Against Hunger - ACF I
Page 5 and 6:
➔ Pages CHAPTER 4: INCOME GENERAT
Page 7 and 8:
➔ questions that can give the rea
Page 9 and 10:
➔ Chapter 4 focuses on programme
Page 11 and 12:
➔ Populations that are facing chr
Page 13 and 14:
➔ This diagram attempts to visual
Page 15 and 16:
➔ - Recuperation and improvement
Page 17 and 18:
➔ Example 3: Creation of IGA in t
Page 19 and 20:
➔ of this first chapter, the recu
Page 22 and 23:
CHAPTER 2: ANALYSIS OF THE CONTEXT,
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
CHAPTER 3: TYPES OF PROGRAMMES AND
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
CHAPTER 4: INCOME GENERATION PROGRA
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66:
Page 69 and 70:
➔ During the monitoring phase, at
Page 71 and 72:
➔ — Debts incurred — Access t
Page 73 and 74:
➔ but proper methodology and soft
Page 75 and 76:
➔ ings are good indicators of imp
Page 77 and 78:
➔ Incomes and expenses of the IGA
Page 79 and 80:
➔ • The success of the experien
Page 82 and 83:
CHAPTER 6: LESSONS LEARNED Some of
Page 84 and 85:
CHAPTER 7: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIO
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
LIST OF FIGURES Pages Figure 1: Liv
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163: Field handbook • Scientific and T
Page 188 and 189: Activities A1. 1. Assessment of pot
Page 238: Field handbook • Scientific and T
show all

Income-Generating Activities - Action Against Hunger

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?