Income-Generating Activities - Action Against Hunger

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Field handbook • Scientific and Technical Department Profitability of different activities of Nemat SFG Activity Period (month) Quantity (heads/ha) Total expenses Gross Profit <strong>Income</strong> <strong>Income</strong> per memberAzM AzM US$ AzM US$ AzM US$ AzM US$ Wheat 8 10 8.958.000 1.906 26.250.000 5.585 17.292.000 3.679 1.729.200 368 Bull fattening 4 10 14.880.000 3.166 18.730.000 3.985 3.850.000 819 3385.000 82 TOTAL income per group member 2.114.200 450 1 USD = 4.700 AZM Source: ACH Projet documentation Date: July 2005 This analysis shows clearly that the incomes produced can cover the expenses for the next cycle, so the activities are sustainable, and at the same time a net profit can be shared among the group members. INCOME GENERATING ACTIVITIES: A KEY CONCEPT IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SECURTIY 229
➔ APPENDIX 24: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR AN EVALUATION Objective: To evaluate the achievements and impacts of the project ______. The evaluation will consider the following criteria: relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, economic and financial viability and sustainability. General terms. The evaluation should consider the hierarchy objectives of the logical framework of the project. These components are part of the project __________________. It will be undertaken as an independent investigation of the objectives, results, activities and means deployed by ACF, in the implementation of the project, in order to come out with a final report highlighting the main findings and putting forth recommendations for the future intervention and decision making. The evaluation should examine the standard and quality of goods and services generated by the project, in the opinion of the beneficiaries, ACF technical departments, technical governmental departments, etcetera. The evaluation requires the evaluator to gather data from outside the project organisation, through meetings and field visits to beneficiaries and other organisations if needed. The evaluation must consider the following criteria: Relevance: • Analysis of the project relevance in the given context according to the identified needs and in terms of beneficiary selection, objectives, activities and strategy. • Analysis of the opportunity of the project intervention, according to the global ACF strategy in the country and the difficulties for access to different areas. • Were the actions undertaken appropriate in the context and do they respond to the population’s needs Sustainability: • Determine if relevant authorities and agencies will support the project objectives after the end of the project. • Evaluate if the beneficiaries and other local parties involved will be the ” project owners ” after the end of the external support. • Evaluate if the institutions, committees, local organisations, community organisations responsible for project follow up will be able to sustain the technology applied after external support has ended. 230 INCOME GENERATING ACTIVITIES: A KEY CONCEPT IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SECURTIY
Page 1 and 2:
Field handbook • Scientific and T
Page 3 and 4:
Edit: Action Against Hunger - ACF I
Page 5 and 6:
➔ Pages CHAPTER 4: INCOME GENERAT
Page 7 and 8:
➔ questions that can give the rea
Page 9 and 10:
➔ Chapter 4 focuses on programme
Page 11 and 12:
➔ Populations that are facing chr
Page 13 and 14:
➔ This diagram attempts to visual
Page 15 and 16:
➔ - Recuperation and improvement
Page 17 and 18:
➔ Example 3: Creation of IGA in t
Page 19 and 20:
➔ of this first chapter, the recu
Page 22 and 23:
CHAPTER 2: ANALYSIS OF THE CONTEXT,
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
CHAPTER 3: TYPES OF PROGRAMMES AND
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
CHAPTER 4: INCOME GENERATION PROGRA
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66:
Page 69 and 70:
➔ During the monitoring phase, at
Page 71 and 72:
➔ — Debts incurred — Access t
Page 73 and 74:
➔ but proper methodology and soft
Page 75 and 76:
➔ ings are good indicators of imp
Page 77 and 78:
➔ Incomes and expenses of the IGA
Page 79 and 80:
➔ • The success of the experien
Page 82 and 83:
CHAPTER 6: LESSONS LEARNED Some of
Page 84 and 85:
CHAPTER 7: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIO
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
LIST OF FIGURES Pages Figure 1: Liv
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181: Field handbook • Scientific and T
Page 188 and 189: Activities A1. 1. Assessment of pot
Page 238: Field handbook • Scientific and T
show all

Income-Generating Activities - Action Against Hunger

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?