25.01.2015 Views

Download Full Issue in PDF - Academy Publisher

Download Full Issue in PDF - Academy Publisher

Download Full Issue in PDF - Academy Publisher

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS, VOL. 8, NO. 6, JUNE 2013 1581<br />

proposed models. In their paper one more robust portfolio<br />

selection model with option protection is proposed by<br />

comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g options <strong>in</strong>to the robust portfolio selection<br />

model. This paper considers the optioned robust portfolio<br />

return.<br />

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In<br />

section 2 we review robust portfolio optimization. In<br />

Section 3 we show how a portfolio that conta<strong>in</strong>s options<br />

can be modeled <strong>in</strong> a robust optimization framework.<br />

Section 4 gives an example based on Monte Carlo<br />

simulation to illustrate the application of the model and<br />

the method. Conclusions are also drawn.<br />

II. ROBUST PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION<br />

We consider the portfolio <strong>in</strong>cludes several European<br />

call options and put options on different stocks. This<br />

portfolio makes extensive use of options to achieve the<br />

desired payoff profile. As we all know, the return of<br />

options depends on the return of the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g stocks. And the <strong>in</strong>puts such as mean or<br />

variance are uncerta<strong>in</strong>, which is lead to the returns of<br />

option are uncerta<strong>in</strong>. However, if the uncerta<strong>in</strong> sets of<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>puts are determ<strong>in</strong>ed, the ones of options are<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g to. Mostly portfolio model <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to<br />

options are only emphasized on portfolio return at the end<br />

of the <strong>in</strong>vestment horizon. Due to the result<strong>in</strong>g<br />

asymmetric portfolio return distribution mean–variance<br />

analysis will be not sufficient to identify optimal optioned<br />

portfolios. From the second half of the last century,<br />

options have been praised for their ability to give stock<br />

holders protection aga<strong>in</strong>st adverse market fluctuations. A<br />

standard option contract is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

parameters: the premium or price of the option, the<br />

underly<strong>in</strong>g security price, the expiration date, and the<br />

strike price. A put (call) option gives the option holder<br />

the right, but not the obligation, to sell to (buy) from the<br />

option writer the underly<strong>in</strong>g security by the expiration<br />

date and at the prescribed strike price. American options<br />

can be exercised at any time up to the expiration date,<br />

whereas European options can be exercised only on the<br />

expiration date itself. We will only aim at European<br />

options, whose expiration is at the end of <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

horizon, that is, at time T. We will pay attention to these<br />

<strong>in</strong>struments because of their simplicity and s<strong>in</strong>ce they<br />

naturally <strong>in</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>gle period portfolio optimization<br />

framework of the previous section.<br />

A. An Introduction to Option Pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

It is necessary to <strong>in</strong>troduce call option first. Suppose an<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestor is presented with an opportunity to enter <strong>in</strong>to a<br />

position <strong>in</strong> a European call option written on a stock, with<br />

strike price K and expiration date T. The stock price<br />

process is assumed to follow a geometric Brownian<br />

motion with mean rate of return μ> 0 and volatility<br />

σ> 0 :<br />

dSt =μ Stdt +σ StdWt<br />

where { W,t<br />

t<br />

≥ 0}<br />

is a standard Brownian motion with<br />

W0<br />

= 0. The basic model for call option of the B–S is:<br />

−rT<br />

( ) ( )<br />

C= SN d − Ke N d<br />

1 2<br />

2<br />

( ) ( )<br />

d1<br />

= ⎡ln S/K r /2 T ⎤<br />

⎣<br />

+ +σ<br />

⎦<br />

/ σ T<br />

d2 = d1−σ<br />

T<br />

where<br />

C call option price;<br />

S current stock price;<br />

K strik<strong>in</strong>g price;<br />

r riskless <strong>in</strong>terest rate;<br />

T time until option expiration;<br />

σ standard deviation of return on the underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

security;<br />

N( d<br />

i ) cumulative normal distribution function evaluated<br />

at d<br />

i<br />

.<br />

The same as put option:<br />

−rT<br />

P = Ke N( d2) − SN( d1)<br />

where P is put option price;<br />

The mean<strong>in</strong>gs of the rest letters are similar to the<br />

formers.<br />

Next, we will improve B-S formula us<strong>in</strong>g analytical<br />

method. It is well known that the basic assumption of B-S<br />

model is to assume the underl<strong>in</strong>g price follows Geometric<br />

Brown motion:<br />

dSt = μ Stdt +σ StdWt<br />

Call option is an option is a security that gives its<br />

owner the right to trade <strong>in</strong> a fixed number of shares of a<br />

specified common stock at a fixed price at any time on or<br />

before a given date. The act of mak<strong>in</strong>g this transaction is<br />

referred to as exercis<strong>in</strong>g the option. The fixed price is<br />

termed the strike price, and the given date, the expiration<br />

date. A call option gives the right to buy the shares; a put<br />

option gives the right to sell the shares.<br />

For an European call option its value at the expired<br />

time T is<br />

CT<br />

= ( ST<br />

− K )<br />

+<br />

Because the future is uncerta<strong>in</strong>, it is stochastic. And<br />

we need to know the current value of option. So it should<br />

to deduce from its expectation ES ( T<br />

− K )<br />

+<br />

The f<strong>in</strong>ancial market is perfect, that is the current value<br />

is equal to the discount of future value.<br />

−rT<br />

C0 = e E( ST<br />

− K )<br />

+<br />

Now, to calculate the expectation based on the hypothesis<br />

of lognormal distribution.<br />

2<br />

+<br />

⎛ σ ⎞<br />

⎛ σ TZ+ r−<br />

T ⎞<br />

+<br />

⎜ 2 ⎟<br />

⎝ ⎠<br />

E ( ST<br />

− K)<br />

= E⎜S0e −K⎟<br />

⎜<br />

⎟<br />

⎝<br />

⎠<br />

where Z∼<br />

N( 0,1)<br />

whose density function is<br />

Let Se<br />

1<br />

f ( x)<br />

= e<br />

2π<br />

2<br />

Ta ⎛<br />

r σ ⎞<br />

σ + ⎜<br />

−<br />

2 ⎟<br />

T<br />

0<br />

K 0<br />

2<br />

x<br />

−<br />

2<br />

⎝ ⎠<br />

− = then<br />

© 2013 ACADEMY PUBLISHER

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!