25.01.2015 Views

Download Full Issue in PDF - Academy Publisher

Download Full Issue in PDF - Academy Publisher

Download Full Issue in PDF - Academy Publisher

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS, VOL. 8, NO. 6, JUNE 2013 1435<br />

value. For example, <strong>in</strong> the scope quantifier ∮ k , k can be<br />

changed cont<strong>in</strong>uously to express the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of the<br />

scope of <strong>in</strong>dividual variables. In special case, k=1<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicates the universal quantifier∀; k>0 <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />

existential quantifier ∃, k=! <strong>in</strong>dicates the only existential<br />

quantifier ∃!; k=0 <strong>in</strong>dicates the constra<strong>in</strong>ts of no scope<br />

quantifier.<br />

4) All k<strong>in</strong>ds of cont<strong>in</strong>uous-valued reason<strong>in</strong>g model<br />

Because the truth value of flexible proposition,<br />

comput<strong>in</strong>g model and quantifiers of proposition<br />

conjunction are flexible, the reason<strong>in</strong>g rules based on<br />

them such as deductive reason<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>ductive reason<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

analogical reason<strong>in</strong>g, assum<strong>in</strong>g reason<strong>in</strong>g, the evolution<br />

of reason<strong>in</strong>g are also flexible. The flexible reason<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rules are different from standard logic, which can coexist<br />

<strong>in</strong> a reason<strong>in</strong>g process. They transform each other by<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g flexible parameters, and <strong>in</strong> which deductive<br />

reason<strong>in</strong>g mode is the most basic mode. Therefore, the<br />

theoretical framework can describe the unity of opposites<br />

and transformation process of contradictions, which<br />

provides the possibility to the symbolization and<br />

mathematization of dialectical logic.<br />

The operators of universal logic as follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

1) Not operation:<br />

NOT operation model N (x) is unary operation on [0,<br />

1]→[0, 1], which satisfies the follow<strong>in</strong>g Not operation<br />

axiom.<br />

Boundary condition N1: N (0)=1, N (1)=0.<br />

Monotonicity N2: N (x) is monotonously decreas<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

iff ∀x, y∈[0, 1], if x 1 then its value will be 1, if x < 0 , its value<br />

will be 0.<br />

1-level universal AND operators are mapp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1 mn mn 1/<br />

mn<br />

T :[0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] T( x, y, h, k) =Γ [( x + y −1) ]<br />

which is usually denoted by<br />

∧<br />

hk ,<br />

. The relation m and h is<br />

as same as (2), the relation of n and k is the same as (1).<br />

There are four special cases of T (x, y, h) (see Figure 2)<br />

as follows:<br />

Zadeh AND operator T (x, y, 1)=T 3 =m<strong>in</strong> (x, y)<br />

Probability AND operator T (x, y, 0.75)=T2=xy<br />

Bounded AND operator T (x, y, 0.5)=T 1 =max (0,<br />

x+y-1)<br />

Drastic AND operator T (x, y, 0)=T 0 =ite{m<strong>in</strong> (x,<br />

y)|max (x, y)=1; 0}<br />

Figure 2. AND operator model figure for special h<br />

3) OR operation:<br />

OR operation model S (x, y) is b<strong>in</strong>ary operation <strong>in</strong> [0,<br />

1] 2 →[0, 1], which satisfies the follow<strong>in</strong>g operation<br />

axioms: x, y, z∈[0, 1].<br />

Boundary condition S (1, y)=1, S (0, y)=y.<br />

Monotonicity S (x, y) <strong>in</strong>creases monotonously along<br />

with x, y.<br />

Association law S (S (x, y), z)=S (x, S (y, z)).<br />

Lower bound S (x, y)≥max (x, y).<br />

The Dualization law holds between S (x, y, k, h) and T<br />

(x, y, k, h).<br />

N (S (x, y, k, h), k)=T (N (x, k), N (y, k), k, h)<br />

N (T (x, y, k, h), k)=S (N (x, k), N (y, k), k, h)<br />

© 2013 ACADEMY PUBLISHER

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!