14.11.2012 Views

Chapter A General rules of electrical installation design

Chapter A General rules of electrical installation design

Chapter A General rules of electrical installation design

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F - Protection against electric shock<br />

The s<strong>of</strong>tware Ecodial is based on the “method<br />

<strong>of</strong> impedance”<br />

The maximum length <strong>of</strong> an IT earthed circuit is:<br />

b For a 3-phase 3-wire scheme<br />

0.8 Uo 3 Sph<br />

Lmax<br />

=<br />

2 �I a 1+<br />

m<br />

( )<br />

b For a 3-phase 4-wire scheme<br />

0.8 Uo S1<br />

Lmax<br />

=<br />

2 �I a 1+<br />

m<br />

( )<br />

N<br />

PE<br />

Id<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Non distributed neutral<br />

(1) Reminder: There is no length limit for earth-fault protection<br />

on a TT scheme, since protection is provided by RCDs <strong>of</strong> high<br />

sensitivity.<br />

7 Implementation <strong>of</strong> the IT system<br />

These methods are reliable only for the cases in which wiring and cables which<br />

make up the fault-current loop are in close proximity (to each other) and are not<br />

separated by ferro-magnetic materials.<br />

Methods <strong>of</strong> impedances<br />

This method as described in Sub-clause 6.2, is identical for both the IT and<br />

TN systems <strong>of</strong> earthing.<br />

Methods <strong>of</strong> composition<br />

This method as described in Sub-clause 6.2, is identical for both the IT and<br />

TN systems <strong>of</strong> earthing.<br />

Conventional method (see Fig. F56)<br />

The principle is the same for an IT system as that described in Sub-clause 6.2 for a<br />

TN system : the calculation <strong>of</strong> maximum circuit lengths which should not be exceeded<br />

downstream <strong>of</strong> a circuit-breaker or fuses, to ensure protection by overcurrent devices.<br />

It is clearly impossible to check circuit lengths for every feasible combination <strong>of</strong> two<br />

concurrent faults.<br />

All cases are covered, however, if the overcurrent trip setting is based on the<br />

assumption that a first fault occurs at the remote end <strong>of</strong> the circuit concerned,<br />

while the second fault occurs at the remote end <strong>of</strong> an identical circuit, as already<br />

mentioned in Sub-clause 3.4. This may result, in general, in one trip-out only<br />

occurring (on the circuit with the lower trip-setting level), thereby leaving the system<br />

in a first-fault situation, but with one faulty circuit switched out <strong>of</strong> service.<br />

b For the case <strong>of</strong> a 3-phase 3-wire <strong>installation</strong> the second fault can only cause a<br />

phase/phase short-circuit, so that the voltage to use in the formula for maximum<br />

circuit length is 3 Uo.<br />

The maximum circuit length is given by:<br />

0.8 Uo 3 Sph<br />

Lmax<br />

=<br />

metres<br />

2 �I a 1+<br />

m<br />

( )<br />

b For the case <strong>of</strong> a 3-phase 4-wire <strong>installation</strong> the lowest value <strong>of</strong> fault current will<br />

occur if one <strong>of</strong> the faults is on a neutral conductor. In this case, Uo is the value to use<br />

for computing the maximum cable length, and<br />

0.8 Uo S1<br />

Lmax<br />

=<br />

2 �I a 1+<br />

m<br />

( )<br />

metres<br />

i.e. 50% only <strong>of</strong> the length permitted for a TN scheme (1)<br />

Fig. F56 : Calculation <strong>of</strong> Lmax. for an IT-earthed system, showing fault-current path for a double-fault condition<br />

Id<br />

A<br />

B<br />

N<br />

PE<br />

Schneider Electric - Electrical <strong>installation</strong> guide 2008<br />

Id<br />

Id<br />

Distributed neutral<br />

F33<br />

© Schneider Electric - all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!