14.11.2012 Views

Chapter A General rules of electrical installation design

Chapter A General rules of electrical installation design

Chapter A General rules of electrical installation design

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L20<br />

© Schneider Electric - all rights reserved<br />

L - Power factor correction and<br />

harmonic filtering<br />

Installation before P.F. correction<br />

� � � (1)<br />

kVA=kW+kvar b kvarh are billed heavily above the declared<br />

level<br />

b Apparent power kVA is significantly greater<br />

� � �<br />

kVA=kW+kvar<br />

kVA than the kW demand<br />

kVA<br />

kW kvar<br />

b The corresponding excess current causes<br />

losses (kWh) which are billed<br />

b The <strong>installation</strong> must be over-dimensioned<br />

kW<br />

630 kVA<br />

400 V<br />

cos ϕ = 0.75<br />

workshop<br />

Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the <strong>installation</strong><br />

500 kW cos ϕ = 0.75<br />

b Transformer is overloaded<br />

b The power demand is<br />

S = P = 500 = 665 kVA<br />

cos ϕ 0.75<br />

S = apparent power<br />

b The current flowing into the <strong>installation</strong><br />

downstream <strong>of</strong> the circuit breaker is<br />

I = P = 960 A<br />

3U cos ϕ<br />

b Losses in cables are calculated as a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> the current squared: 960 2<br />

P=I 2 R<br />

cos ϕ = 0.75<br />

b Reactive energy is supplied through the<br />

transformer and via the <strong>installation</strong> wiring<br />

b The transformer, circuit breaker, and cables<br />

must be over-dimensioned<br />

8 Example <strong>of</strong> an <strong>installation</strong><br />

before and after power-factor<br />

correction<br />

Schneider Electric - Electrical <strong>installation</strong> guide 2008<br />

Installation after P.F. correction<br />

630 kVA<br />

400 V<br />

cos ϕ = 0.75<br />

workshop<br />

Fig. K27 : Technical-economic comparison <strong>of</strong> an <strong>installation</strong> before and after power-factor correction<br />

(1) The arrows denote vector quantities.<br />

(2) Particularly in the pre-corrected case.<br />

b The consumption <strong>of</strong> kvarh is<br />

v Eliminated, or<br />

v Reduced, according to the cos ϕ required<br />

b The tariff penalties<br />

v For reactive energy where applicable<br />

v For the entire bill in some cases are<br />

eliminated<br />

b The fixed charge based on kVA demand is<br />

adjusted to be close to the active power kW<br />

demand<br />

Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the <strong>installation</strong><br />

500 kW cos ϕ = 0.928<br />

b Transformer no longer overloaded<br />

b The power-demand is 539 kVA<br />

b There is 14% spare-transformer capacity<br />

available<br />

b The current flowing into the <strong>installation</strong><br />

through the circuit breaker is 778 A<br />

250 kvar<br />

b The losses in the cables are<br />

reduced to 7782 = 65% <strong>of</strong> the former value,<br />

960 2<br />

thereby economizing in kWh consumed<br />

cos ϕ = 0.928<br />

b Reactive energy is supplied by the capacitor<br />

bank<br />

Capacitor bank rating is 250 kvar<br />

in 5 automatically-controlled steps <strong>of</strong> 50 kvar.<br />

Note: In fact, the cos ϕ <strong>of</strong> the workshop remains at 0.75 but cos ϕ for all the<br />

<strong>installation</strong> upstream <strong>of</strong> the capacitor bank to the transformer LV terminals<br />

is 0.928.<br />

As mentioned in Sub-clause 6.2 the cos ϕ at the HV side <strong>of</strong> the transformer<br />

will be slightly lower (2) , due to the reactive power losses in the transformer.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!