You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ORAL PRESENTATIONS<br />
168<br />
Free Paper Session: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy<br />
NPWT* AND ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT: A COMPLEX THERAPEUTIC STRATEGY<br />
TO TREAT DIFFICULT TO HEAL WOUNDS IN SEVERE PROSTHETIC JOINT<br />
INFECTIONS<br />
Ciro Pempinello 1 , Aldo Bova 1 , Fiorella Martucci 2 , Raffaele Pempinello 2<br />
1 Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology – S.Gennaro Hospital (Napoli, Italy);<br />
2 Department of Infectious Diseases – Cotugno Hospital (Napoli, Italy).<br />
Aim: Treatment of soft tissue defects resulting from bone infections,when foreign<br />
implants are involved, represents a major challenge.VAC therapy has recently been<br />
used in orthopedic field for management of open wounds. The purpose of this study was<br />
to evaluate the use of VAC Therapy to improve the outcome of high risk wounds in<br />
critical patients affected by periprosthetic infections.<br />
Methods: We observed 22 patients out of 36 affected by severe periprosthetic infections<br />
with comorbidities, presenting difficult to heal wounds. These infections were treated<br />
with 2 stage procedure, and VAC was applied. Targeted antibiotic long therapy was<br />
administered. The study evaluated treatment for up to 16 weeks or till complete closure<br />
was achieved compared with control group of 14 patients treated with conventional<br />
dressing. Size of wound healing and time of closure were compared. No relapse was<br />
observed in 22 patients(mean follow-up 24 months).<br />
Results: 22 patients received VAC for 3 weeks. The sponge was inserted into the<br />
wound cavity/periprosthetically at the pressure of 150mm Hg till sponge removal. A<br />
better and more rapid control of the infection and reduced time to complete closure of<br />
the wound was achieved in 19/22 patients treated with VAC compared with 5/14 patients<br />
in control group.<br />
Conclusion: VAC therapy would increase faster wound healing than treatment with<br />
conventional dressing therapy. Based on our data, VAC shows an high infection<br />
eradication rate with positive effect on wound healing and should be considered for high<br />
risk wounds in patients affected by periprosthetic infections with comorbidities.<br />
*VAC therapy<br />
FREE PAPER SESSION: NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY<br />
169<br />
Free Paper Session: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy<br />
THE ROLE OF VACUUM IN THE TREATMENT OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT DEEP<br />
STERNAL WOUND INFECTION<br />
Marisa De Feo 1 , Veronica D›Oria 1 , Ester Della Ratta 1 , Marco Montibello 1 ,<br />
Alessandro Della Corte 1 , Pasquale Santè 1 , Gianantonio Nappi 1<br />
1 Dpt Cardiothoracic Science Second University of Naples (Naples, Italy).<br />
Aim: To review our experience with two alternative treatments of deep sternal wound<br />
infections (DSWI), focusing on methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections.<br />
Methods: Between 2009 and 2012, 35 patients with post-cardiotomy DSWI were<br />
primarily treated by NPWT*. In 24 of them the etiology was staphylococcal (Group A).<br />
Comparisons were performed with 30 previous staphylococcal DSWI patients who<br />
received closed mediastinal irrigation with antibiotic solution (Group B). The prevalence<br />
of methicillin-resistance was:groups A=68.5%, B=56.7%. Hospital-stay and time between<br />
DSWI treatment initiation and wound healing were compared between the two groups.<br />
Results: One Group B patient died during DSWI treatment. The median healing time<br />
was 14 days in Group A (mean 15.5±3.2), 18 (mean 21.2±16.4) in Group B (p=0.03).<br />
DSWI did not recur following NPWT* treatment, while 7 patients had recurrence in Group<br />
B (24%). Hospital-stay was significantly shorter in Group A (median 27.5 days, mean<br />
29.2±11.3 versus 45, 49.2±19.3; p