You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
POSTER: ACUTE WOUNDS<br />
Poster: Acute Wounds<br />
P 196<br />
DEEPLY BURNED HANDS TREATED BY FAST BROMELAIN BASED ENZYMATIC<br />
DEBRIDEMENT: COMPARISON TO SOC<br />
Yaron Shoham 1 , Yuval Krieger 1 , Alexander Bogdanov-Berezovsky 1 , Eldad Silberstein 1 ,<br />
Adam Singer 2<br />
1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burn Unit, Soroka University<br />
Medical Center (Be’er Sheva, Israel);<br />
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University (Stony Brook, New York,<br />
United States).<br />
Aim: To investigate the role of Bromelain debriding* (BD) agent in treating deeply<br />
burned hands.<br />
Methods: Following an in-vivo porcine circumferential burn model, a prospective,<br />
randomized controlled Phase III trial (181 patients) and a retrospective analysis of 154<br />
files of a previous clinical study were used to study BD efficacy in debriding and<br />
resolving/preventing burn induced compartment syndrome (BICS). The implication of<br />
such an enzymatic debrider on surgical burden in deep hand burns care, compared to a<br />
control group of burned hands treated by standard of care (SOC) were assessed by<br />
endpoints of incidence and wound area surgically debrided and autografted,<br />
escharotomy incidence as well as before and after interstitial/ compartment pressures.<br />
Results: Data of 130 BD and 41 SOC treated burned hands in two studies as well as 20<br />
porcine circumferential burns demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in post BD<br />
application pressure. No escharotomy was performed in all BD treated hands<br />
(0/130=0%) vs. 4 hands (4/41=9.7%), escharotomized in the SOC arm. A statistically<br />
significant decrease in time to complete debridement, excisional and grafting surgery<br />
and comparable scarring compared to SOC was found.<br />
Conclusion: Use of BD to treat deeply burned hands significantly decreased the time to<br />
complete debridement and surgical load (excisional and autografting surgery), offering<br />
more preserved viable dermis for epithelialization. Statistically significant BICS and<br />
interstitial pressure reduction/preventing has been observed both in animal and human<br />
studies.<br />
* BD is distributed as NexoBrid (previously published as Debrase, Debridase ® ) by Mediwound LTD<br />
P 197<br />
NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF ACUTE<br />
PURULENT SOFT TISSUE DISEASES<br />
Poster: Acute Wounds<br />
Alexander Ermolov 1 , Vladimir Obolenskiy 2 , Grigoriy Rodoman 1<br />
1 RNRMU (Moscow, Russia);<br />
2 City Hospital # 13 (Moscow, Russia).<br />
Aim: To assess the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in treatment of<br />
soft tissues acute purulent diseases (STAPD).<br />
Methods: Analysis of treatment outcomes of 31 patients with extensive phlegmons and<br />
abscesses was performed. On admission all patients underwent incision and drainage of<br />
purulent focusand received empirical antibiotic therapy. On day 3 NPWT was used for<br />
the wound (experimental group: 8 males, 9 females, mean age was 51.5±4.5 years,<br />
mean baseline wound volume 315.2±70.2 cm3, bacterial contamination level was 107),<br />
dressing was changed every 3-4 days, or dressings with traditional topical antiseptics<br />
were used (control: 6/8; 49.1±4.5; 315.4±91.4 cm3; 107), followed by daily dressing<br />
change. Following wound decontamination and formation of granulation tissue,<br />
secondary sutures were applied.<br />
Results: On day 7 in the experimental group, the mean wound volume was 96.5 cm3<br />
with bacterial contamination level 102, while in the control group those were 162.1 cm3<br />
and 105, respectively. Time to applying secondary suturesin patients of the experimental<br />
group was 10.2±1.1 days,while in the control group it was 18.6±0.6 (sutures were<br />
applied in 3 patients only). Mean duration of hospital stay was 16.0±1.7 days and<br />
21.6±1.9 days, respectively. Mean cost of treatment was EUR 1593.93 and EUR<br />
1822.14 per patient, respectively.<br />
Conclusion: NPWT isa clinically beneficial and cost effective method of treatment of<br />
STAPD.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />
COPENHAGEN<br />
15-17 May · <strong>2013</strong><br />
Danish Wound<br />
Healing Society<br />
127