03.05.2015 Views

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

POSTER: ACUTE WOUNDS<br />

Poster: Acute Wounds<br />

P 196<br />

DEEPLY BURNED HANDS TREATED BY FAST BROMELAIN BASED ENZYMATIC<br />

DEBRIDEMENT: COMPARISON TO SOC<br />

Yaron Shoham 1 , Yuval Krieger 1 , Alexander Bogdanov-Berezovsky 1 , Eldad Silberstein 1 ,<br />

Adam Singer 2<br />

1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burn Unit, Soroka University<br />

Medical Center (Be’er Sheva, Israel);<br />

2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University (Stony Brook, New York,<br />

United States).<br />

Aim: To investigate the role of Bromelain debriding* (BD) agent in treating deeply<br />

burned hands.<br />

Methods: Following an in-vivo porcine circumferential burn model, a prospective,<br />

randomized controlled Phase III trial (181 patients) and a retrospective analysis of 154<br />

files of a previous clinical study were used to study BD efficacy in debriding and<br />

resolving/preventing burn induced compartment syndrome (BICS). The implication of<br />

such an enzymatic debrider on surgical burden in deep hand burns care, compared to a<br />

control group of burned hands treated by standard of care (SOC) were assessed by<br />

endpoints of incidence and wound area surgically debrided and autografted,<br />

escharotomy incidence as well as before and after interstitial/ compartment pressures.<br />

Results: Data of 130 BD and 41 SOC treated burned hands in two studies as well as 20<br />

porcine circumferential burns demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in post BD<br />

application pressure. No escharotomy was performed in all BD treated hands<br />

(0/130=0%) vs. 4 hands (4/41=9.7%), escharotomized in the SOC arm. A statistically<br />

significant decrease in time to complete debridement, excisional and grafting surgery<br />

and comparable scarring compared to SOC was found.<br />

Conclusion: Use of BD to treat deeply burned hands significantly decreased the time to<br />

complete debridement and surgical load (excisional and autografting surgery), offering<br />

more preserved viable dermis for epithelialization. Statistically significant BICS and<br />

interstitial pressure reduction/preventing has been observed both in animal and human<br />

studies.<br />

* BD is distributed as NexoBrid (previously published as Debrase, Debridase ® ) by Mediwound LTD<br />

P 197<br />

NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF ACUTE<br />

PURULENT SOFT TISSUE DISEASES<br />

Poster: Acute Wounds<br />

Alexander Ermolov 1 , Vladimir Obolenskiy 2 , Grigoriy Rodoman 1<br />

1 RNRMU (Moscow, Russia);<br />

2 City Hospital # 13 (Moscow, Russia).<br />

Aim: To assess the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in treatment of<br />

soft tissues acute purulent diseases (STAPD).<br />

Methods: Analysis of treatment outcomes of 31 patients with extensive phlegmons and<br />

abscesses was performed. On admission all patients underwent incision and drainage of<br />

purulent focusand received empirical antibiotic therapy. On day 3 NPWT was used for<br />

the wound (experimental group: 8 males, 9 females, mean age was 51.5±4.5 years,<br />

mean baseline wound volume 315.2±70.2 cm3, bacterial contamination level was 107),<br />

dressing was changed every 3-4 days, or dressings with traditional topical antiseptics<br />

were used (control: 6/8; 49.1±4.5; 315.4±91.4 cm3; 107), followed by daily dressing<br />

change. Following wound decontamination and formation of granulation tissue,<br />

secondary sutures were applied.<br />

Results: On day 7 in the experimental group, the mean wound volume was 96.5 cm3<br />

with bacterial contamination level 102, while in the control group those were 162.1 cm3<br />

and 105, respectively. Time to applying secondary suturesin patients of the experimental<br />

group was 10.2±1.1 days,while in the control group it was 18.6±0.6 (sutures were<br />

applied in 3 patients only). Mean duration of hospital stay was 16.0±1.7 days and<br />

21.6±1.9 days, respectively. Mean cost of treatment was EUR 1593.93 and EUR<br />

1822.14 per patient, respectively.<br />

Conclusion: NPWT isa clinically beneficial and cost effective method of treatment of<br />

STAPD.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />

COPENHAGEN<br />

15-17 May · <strong>2013</strong><br />

Danish Wound<br />

Healing Society<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!