03.05.2015 Views

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E-POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />

EP 496<br />

Health Eduaction<br />

E-Poster: Education<br />

Charlotte Brink Andersen 1 , Karin Hansen 1 , Else Due 1<br />

1 Copenhagen Wound Healing Center (Copenhagen, Denmark).<br />

The aim of the intervention is that patients suffering from infected diabetic ulcers<br />

become aware of foot problems in their neuropathic feet. Furthermore the aim is that the<br />

patients and their relatives are well-informed of preventive care and apply their<br />

optimized knowledge into their daily life.<br />

Our patients suffer from multi-morbidity and from injuries caused by alcoholism causing<br />

cognitive dysfunction. They lack skills of seeking information and they lack practical<br />

knowledge on actively coping off-loading treatment. A team of two nurses and a<br />

podiatrist teach a group of 8-15 patients and their relatives in basic self-care skills and<br />

discuss the practical problems related to off-loading treatment.<br />

Methods: Demonstration foot problems and self care.<br />

Identifying barriers of self care and podiatrist care<br />

Discussing off-loading treatment and daily life<br />

The unawareness of neuropathy is a pedagogical challenge. We experiment on creating<br />

curiosity by aesthetically visualizing neuropathic foot problems and demonstrating<br />

remedies for safe self-care. Identified barriers concerning self-care management is<br />

discussed where the patients challenge us by asking questions. Finally the patients are<br />

challenged by working out realistic solutions.<br />

Group education holds a unique opportunity for building a dynamic and supportive<br />

partnership between patients, relatives and health-care professionals. However the<br />

identified problems still need individual follow-up care. The aetiology of neuropathy is not<br />

altered. This fact requires constant training. Group education holds possibilities of<br />

teaching basic self-care skills or brush-up courses. Patient instructors may also hold an<br />

exciting potential as role models.<br />

E-POSTER: EDUCATION<br />

EP 497<br />

E-Poster: Education<br />

Evidence based assessment of moist wound healing dressings:<br />

in vitro, in vivo and clinical<br />

Alexander Waite 1 , Jim Mellor 1 , Breda Cullen 1<br />

1 Systagenix (Gatwick, United Kingdom).<br />

Aim: This investigation aims to conduct a comprehensive review of published supportive<br />

evidence underpinning a hydropolymer foam wound dressing and to determine the<br />

clinical relevance of in vitro data.<br />

Introduction: Evidence provides the basis for selection and correct use of wound care<br />

products. Different types of supportive data are available including; laboratory studies,<br />

reviews, case reports, clinical evaluations and randomised clinical trials (RCT). However<br />

there is debate over what qualifies as sufficient evidence to make an informed decision<br />

concerning dressing selection.<br />

Methods: In this study we review the strength of evidence available for a hydropolymer<br />

moist wound healing dressing. There is a clear hierarchy of supportive data: Level 1:<br />

RCT ; Level 2: Case studies/series and clinical assessment ; Level 3: Laboratory based<br />

in vitro and in vivo analysis. In addition we looked to see if data generated in vitro could<br />

be confirmed in clinical practice and if models used to assess dressings in vitro are<br />

clinically relevant.<br />

Results: Evidence is available from multiple levels from laboratory based analysis to<br />

RCTs. Although RCTs are deemed to hold the highest clinical significance, it is important<br />

to acknowledge the significance of non-clinical evidence that although not clinically<br />

sourced holds clinical relevance through addressing distinct clinical needs and<br />

scenarios.<br />

Conclusion: We conclude that all levels of evidence are important and help in the<br />

overall assessment of a product. While in vitro data allows for more extensive testing,<br />

the model should be evaluated for clinical relevance and where possible outcomes<br />

confirmed in clinical practice.<br />

284

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!