03.05.2015 Views

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

E-POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />

EP 440<br />

E-Poster: Acute Wounds<br />

Treatment of burns by a honey gauze: A small-scale clinical essay<br />

to assess its efficacy<br />

Aharon Wanszelbaum 1<br />

1 Meuhedet health service wound clinics (Jerusalem, Israel).<br />

In wound treatments, honey dressings and gels have provided good results, so we<br />

assumed that burns could also benefit. We developed a small-scale essay to try a honey<br />

gauze with medicinal, controlled honey. The gauze was expected to be non- adherent to<br />

the burn and the honey to contribute its potent antibacterial effects, hyperosmolarity and<br />

other characteristics that could induce a nicer healed skin. Four patients were included<br />

in the essay, with an age range between 20-73 years old, with superficial to partial<br />

thickness burns caused by a variety of incidents (hot oil, hot water, gas explosion). The<br />

wounds were compared with treatment with silver sulfadiazine or silver foam dressings.<br />

Results showed that the honey dressings were superior over the silver treatment in all<br />

aspects of the wound healing process. Of the four patients three healed quickly with<br />

significantly less than normal dressing changes. One of the patients had to drop out due<br />

to pain complaints – a common contra-indication of honey. Nevertheless, the wounds<br />

treated with honey also showed a much better closure/scarring than the wounds treated<br />

with silver. A larger size trial is required to draw further conclusions.<br />

* Honey gauze used: Revamil ® Wound Dressing<br />

E-POSTER: BASIC SCIENCE<br />

EP 441<br />

E-Poster: Basic Science<br />

IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE DEBRIDEMENT PERFORMANCE OF A NEW<br />

DEBRIDER* COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL COTTON GAUZE<br />

Cornelia Wiegand 1 , Kirsten Reddersen 1 , Martin Abel 2 , Jeanette Muldoon 3 , Peter Ruth 2 ,<br />

Uta-Christina Hipler 1<br />

1 Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Jena (Jena, Germany);<br />

2 Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH & Co. KG (Rengsdorf, Germany);<br />

3 Activa Healthcare Ltd. (Burton upon Trent, United Kingdom).<br />

Aim: Wound debridement is a major challenge in treatment of chronic wounds.<br />

Conventional debridement methods relaying on gauze may not be enough. Surgical<br />

debridement requires trained personal, operation theatre and is often associated with<br />

pain. A new debrider* consisting of polyester monofilamentfibres presents a novel, fast<br />

and almost painless option for debridement. We have investigated the performance of<br />

this new debrider* in vitro and compared it to cotton gauze**.<br />

Methods: The wound debridement model consists of glass plates coated with a protein<br />

crust, to imitate wound slough. The debrider* and cotton gauze** were used to debride/<br />

clean the glass plates under standardized conditions (p=0.067N/cm 2 , v=1.6cm/s). Plate<br />

images were processed using ImageJ 1.45m.<br />

Results: The debrider* exhibited a significantly higher cleansing performance than<br />

gauze**, e.g. cotton gauze** reduced the clogged area about 10% while the debrider*<br />

removed more than 70% of the slough, respectively. Moreover, the debrider* was able to<br />

achieve a significant cleansing effect (area cleaned > 70%) for at least four applications<br />

(one pad was used to clean all plates) while cotton gauze** quickly lost its.<br />

Conclusions: The debridement performance of the new debrider* is significantly higher<br />

than that of cotton gauze**. Moreover, the debrider* presents a non-invasive and<br />

therefore almost painless alternative to other. Hence, this new technique should provide<br />

a valuable tool in the treatment of patients with chronic wounds to improve the quality of<br />

life as well as to safe costs.<br />

* Debrisoft ® ; Lohmann & Rauscher; ** cotton gauze, Fuhrmann<br />

256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!