Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
E-POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />
EP 440<br />
E-Poster: Acute Wounds<br />
Treatment of burns by a honey gauze: A small-scale clinical essay<br />
to assess its efficacy<br />
Aharon Wanszelbaum 1<br />
1 Meuhedet health service wound clinics (Jerusalem, Israel).<br />
In wound treatments, honey dressings and gels have provided good results, so we<br />
assumed that burns could also benefit. We developed a small-scale essay to try a honey<br />
gauze with medicinal, controlled honey. The gauze was expected to be non- adherent to<br />
the burn and the honey to contribute its potent antibacterial effects, hyperosmolarity and<br />
other characteristics that could induce a nicer healed skin. Four patients were included<br />
in the essay, with an age range between 20-73 years old, with superficial to partial<br />
thickness burns caused by a variety of incidents (hot oil, hot water, gas explosion). The<br />
wounds were compared with treatment with silver sulfadiazine or silver foam dressings.<br />
Results showed that the honey dressings were superior over the silver treatment in all<br />
aspects of the wound healing process. Of the four patients three healed quickly with<br />
significantly less than normal dressing changes. One of the patients had to drop out due<br />
to pain complaints – a common contra-indication of honey. Nevertheless, the wounds<br />
treated with honey also showed a much better closure/scarring than the wounds treated<br />
with silver. A larger size trial is required to draw further conclusions.<br />
* Honey gauze used: Revamil ® Wound Dressing<br />
E-POSTER: BASIC SCIENCE<br />
EP 441<br />
E-Poster: Basic Science<br />
IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE DEBRIDEMENT PERFORMANCE OF A NEW<br />
DEBRIDER* COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL COTTON GAUZE<br />
Cornelia Wiegand 1 , Kirsten Reddersen 1 , Martin Abel 2 , Jeanette Muldoon 3 , Peter Ruth 2 ,<br />
Uta-Christina Hipler 1<br />
1 Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Jena (Jena, Germany);<br />
2 Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH & Co. KG (Rengsdorf, Germany);<br />
3 Activa Healthcare Ltd. (Burton upon Trent, United Kingdom).<br />
Aim: Wound debridement is a major challenge in treatment of chronic wounds.<br />
Conventional debridement methods relaying on gauze may not be enough. Surgical<br />
debridement requires trained personal, operation theatre and is often associated with<br />
pain. A new debrider* consisting of polyester monofilamentfibres presents a novel, fast<br />
and almost painless option for debridement. We have investigated the performance of<br />
this new debrider* in vitro and compared it to cotton gauze**.<br />
Methods: The wound debridement model consists of glass plates coated with a protein<br />
crust, to imitate wound slough. The debrider* and cotton gauze** were used to debride/<br />
clean the glass plates under standardized conditions (p=0.067N/cm 2 , v=1.6cm/s). Plate<br />
images were processed using ImageJ 1.45m.<br />
Results: The debrider* exhibited a significantly higher cleansing performance than<br />
gauze**, e.g. cotton gauze** reduced the clogged area about 10% while the debrider*<br />
removed more than 70% of the slough, respectively. Moreover, the debrider* was able to<br />
achieve a significant cleansing effect (area cleaned > 70%) for at least four applications<br />
(one pad was used to clean all plates) while cotton gauze** quickly lost its.<br />
Conclusions: The debridement performance of the new debrider* is significantly higher<br />
than that of cotton gauze**. Moreover, the debrider* presents a non-invasive and<br />
therefore almost painless alternative to other. Hence, this new technique should provide<br />
a valuable tool in the treatment of patients with chronic wounds to improve the quality of<br />
life as well as to safe costs.<br />
* Debrisoft ® ; Lohmann & Rauscher; ** cotton gauze, Fuhrmann<br />
256