03.05.2015 Views

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

POSTER: DIABETIC FOOT<br />

Poster: Devices & Intervention<br />

P 248<br />

Results OF AN OBSERVATION STUDY ON THIRTEEN MIXED OR ARTERIAL LEG<br />

ULCER PATIENTS WITH A NEW TWO-COMPONENT-SYSTEM (TCS)*<br />

Martin Abel 1 , Sergio Mazzei 2 , Giovanni Mosti 3 , Agnes Collarte 4 , Valentina Dini 5 ,<br />

Stefan Bahr 6 , Anna Coulborn 7 , Carsten Hampel-Kalthoff 8 , Christiane Zell 1 ,<br />

Roberto Brambilla 2 , Hildegard Charles 4<br />

1 Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH & Co KG (Rengsdorf, Germany);<br />

2 Istituti Clinica Zucchi (Monza, Italy);<br />

3<br />

Private Out-patients Ambulance (Lucca, Italy);<br />

4 Tissue Viability Department, Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust, St<br />

Charles Hospital (London, United Kingdom); 5 Private Out-patients Ambulance (La<br />

Spezia, Italy); 6 TCW Therapiezentrum chronische Wunden Ortenau (Lahr, Germany);<br />

7 The Wound Healing Centre WHC Eastbourne (Eastbourne, United Kingdom);<br />

8 ORGAMED Dortmund GmbH (Dortmund, Germany).<br />

Introduction: To compare the usability of an innovative new CE-marked short stretch<br />

compression system, Two-Component-System (TCS)* on mixed (MLU) or arterial leg<br />

ulcer (ALU) patients in comparison to venous leg ulcer (VLU) patients a sub-analysis of<br />

an observation study was conducted.<br />

Material & Methods: In a multicentre (7), international post marketing surveillance study<br />

(PMS) on 102 leg ulcer patients with or without oedema treated with TCS* over 2 weeks<br />

the usability of the compression system could be proven. Thirteen (12.75%) of these<br />

patients (13/102) were diagnosed with non-infected mixed or arterial leg ulcers with an<br />

ankle brachial index (ABPI) generally measured between 0.5 and 0.9. The application of<br />

the set was applied according to the instructions of use (compression bandage full<br />

stretch/safe lock) and under supervision of the responsible physician.<br />

Results: For MLU or ALU patients the TCS* showed in the general assessment<br />

(slippage, rolling, loss of sensitivity, feeling of tightness, of heat, itching, exudate in the<br />

bandage) very good results – total mean** 0.3 = ‘low’ to ‘nothing’. Equally very good<br />

results has been observed for in the technical assessment of TCS* (easy to use,<br />

movement of the ankle was sufficient, very thin – no problems for shoes, comfortable),<br />

the quality of life evaluation (feeling of well-being in general, during night or day, social<br />

life conditions, the working ability, joy of life, wearing comfort and very thin) and the<br />

potential for oedema reduction rated with a total mean* of 1.5 to 2.0 = ‘very good’. Skin<br />

alterations were very rare. The results are comparable to the results of VLU patients.<br />

Conclusions: TCS* is very tolerable, safe and comfortable for treating all leg ulcers –<br />

also mixed or arterial ulcers (under supervision of the responsible physician) – with or<br />

without oedema.<br />

*Rosidal ® TCS, Lohmann & Rauscher. **median<br />

P 249<br />

ASSESSING CHRONIC DIABETIC FOOT WOUNDS FOR EPA (ELEVATED<br />

PROTEASE ACTIVITY)<br />

Poster: Diabetic Foot<br />

Paul Chadwick 1<br />

1 Salford Royal (NHS) Foundation Trust (Salford, United Kingdom).<br />

Aim: The primary objective was to evaluate the clinical benefits of using a new protease<br />

activity test* capable of assessing protease activity directly from wound fluid. It is<br />

designed to help clinicians establish within minutes which wounds may most benefit from<br />

a protease modulating therapy, thus ensuring appropriate and targeted use of these<br />

therapies.<br />

Methods: 15 chronic diabetic foot ulcers from a convenience sample of patients<br />

attending a multi-disciplinary foot clinic, was assessed using the new protease test. Data<br />

was collected on wound age, prior treatment, and the percentage of ‘elevated’ test<br />

results and clinicians were asked to rate several elements regarding the practicalities of<br />

the test using a likert scale.<br />

Results: EPA prevalence for the test group was 33%. The mean scores for:-<br />

• Ease of use of the test was 4.6 out of 5<br />

• Degree to which the test improved wound assessment – 4.3.<br />

• Degree of improvement in confidence in treatment choice – 4.3.<br />

• Degree to which the test offered the ability to allocate advanced therapies more<br />

effectively – 4.6.<br />

One particular case demonstrated that detecting EPA and treating with a protease<br />

modulator the wound significantly reduced in size and was now on a healing trajectory<br />

within 3 weeks.<br />

Conclusions: Protease testing enables clinicians to target therapies more effectively.<br />

Clinical and budgetary benefits can only be maximised on if diagnostic tools are used as<br />

part of an integrated, structured approach to patient management.<br />

*WOUNDCHEK Protease Status<br />

**PROMOGRAN PRISMA ®<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />

COPENHAGEN<br />

15-17 May · <strong>2013</strong><br />

Danish Wound<br />

Healing Society<br />

153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!