03.05.2015 Views

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

E-POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />

EP 504<br />

E-Poster: Health Economics & Outcome<br />

ECONOMICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN THREE DIFFERENT TYPES OF<br />

DEBRIDEMENT (AUTOLYTIC AND ENZYMATIC VS MECHANICAL DEBRIDEMENT<br />

WITH POLYESTER FIBRES)<br />

Renato Pietroletti 1 , Ivano Capriotti 2 , Raffaele Di Nardo 3 , Paolo Mascioli 4 , Maria<br />

Gonzalez 5 , Paola Ermolli 6<br />

1 University of l’Aquila- Hospital Val Vibrata (Sant’Omero (TE), Italy);<br />

2 Surgery (Sant’Omero, Italy);<br />

3 ASL Lanciano (Lanciano (Switzerland), Italy);<br />

4 ASL Pescara (Pescara, Italy);<br />

5 Horizon Service (Pescara, Italy);<br />

6 Lohmann&Rauscher (Padova, Italy).<br />

Introduction: Not every debridement technique is effective, safe, cost-effective. In<br />

home care and in the first-level-hospital, adequate debridement could be a problem;<br />

Italian nurses use autolytic, enzymatic, mechanical methods, requiring several<br />

accesses. In a first-level-hospital, the surgical debridement may be difficult. A new<br />

method – polyester monofilament fibres debrider*- allows fast, almost painless, effective<br />

debridement in sloughy, fibrinous wounds and in peri-wound skin: we demonstrate that<br />

this debrider* is effective, safe, cost effective.<br />

Methods: 27 patients (average age 76) with ulcers of various aetiology were treated.<br />

This prospective documented group was compared with another group (25 patients,<br />

average age 78), retrospectively. The wounds were fibrinous, sloughy; periwound with<br />

keratosis, desiccated exudate or dressing; max area of wounds approx 60cm2. The<br />

costs at home includes: time, all materials.<br />

Results: The mean cost for single use were similar in both groups (mean: € 30,29<br />

autolytic; € 35,54 debrider*), the results were different (best for debrider*). One use of<br />

the debrider gives a mean of 92% of debrided tissue, 2 uses of autolytic gives 38.4%.<br />

The autolytic requires 8-10 times to give the same results as the debrider*. Using the<br />

debrider* 1 time, the cost saving would be approx € 115 when compared with 5 times<br />

using autolytic. The costs for similar results are lower with the debrider*.<br />

Conclusions: This debrider* is a very fast, effective, safe method to debride wounds in<br />

the homecare / ambulant area; it cares the granulation, it helps to remove bacteria and<br />

is not expensive.<br />

E-POSTER: HEALTH ECONOMICS & OUTCOME<br />

EP 505<br />

EFFICIENCY IN TACKLING WOUNDS<br />

E-Poster: Health Economics & Outcome<br />

Ana Maria Calvo 1 , Carmen Alba 2 , Raquel Contreras 3 , Esther Armans 4<br />

1Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (Salamanca, Spain);<br />

2 Hospital Clínico de Valencia (Valencia, Spain);<br />

3 Centro de Salud Inmaculada Vieira (Sevilla, Spain);<br />

4 Hospital Clinic (Barcelona, Spain).<br />

Introduction: The Spanish National Health Service (NHS) allocates an 8.5% GDP to<br />

attend more than 46 million people, and spends more than 6% of this money in patients<br />

carriers of wounds. In the current crisis, is debated the future of provisions and<br />

sustainability, therefore, the Spanish Association of Vascular Nursing and Wounds<br />

(AEEVH) raises this study<br />

Objectives: Describe Spanish NHS resources offered to patients with wounds of lower<br />

limb. Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cares offered to people with wounds of lower<br />

limb<br />

Material and Methods: Descriptive study of Spanish public resources for patients with<br />

wounds of lower limbs and cost-benefit assessment<br />

Results: There is variability of human and material resources in the 17 regions, 254<br />

hospitals, 2914 health centers and 10,202 consultancies. Telemedicine is available at<br />

hospitals and health centers. Most of professionals who care for patients with wounds do<br />

not have access to costs. The waiting time for the specialist is more than 50 days.<br />

Currently there are 7 units of wounds, led by expert nurses in wounds that support<br />

integrated care streamlining the coordination of professionals and assistance levels<br />

Conclusion: The resources offered in the Spanish NHS to patients with wounds of lower<br />

limbs, are different depending on where the patient lives. Wounds units in Spain have<br />

allowed better understanding of costs and maximization of resources, ensuring a<br />

comprehensive approach, faster and easier. Therefore, this type of units, led by expert<br />

nurses, is emerging as an efficient tool.<br />

288

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!