Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
E-POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />
EP 504<br />
E-Poster: Health Economics & Outcome<br />
ECONOMICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN THREE DIFFERENT TYPES OF<br />
DEBRIDEMENT (AUTOLYTIC AND ENZYMATIC VS MECHANICAL DEBRIDEMENT<br />
WITH POLYESTER FIBRES)<br />
Renato Pietroletti 1 , Ivano Capriotti 2 , Raffaele Di Nardo 3 , Paolo Mascioli 4 , Maria<br />
Gonzalez 5 , Paola Ermolli 6<br />
1 University of l’Aquila- Hospital Val Vibrata (Sant’Omero (TE), Italy);<br />
2 Surgery (Sant’Omero, Italy);<br />
3 ASL Lanciano (Lanciano (Switzerland), Italy);<br />
4 ASL Pescara (Pescara, Italy);<br />
5 Horizon Service (Pescara, Italy);<br />
6 Lohmann&Rauscher (Padova, Italy).<br />
Introduction: Not every debridement technique is effective, safe, cost-effective. In<br />
home care and in the first-level-hospital, adequate debridement could be a problem;<br />
Italian nurses use autolytic, enzymatic, mechanical methods, requiring several<br />
accesses. In a first-level-hospital, the surgical debridement may be difficult. A new<br />
method – polyester monofilament fibres debrider*- allows fast, almost painless, effective<br />
debridement in sloughy, fibrinous wounds and in peri-wound skin: we demonstrate that<br />
this debrider* is effective, safe, cost effective.<br />
Methods: 27 patients (average age 76) with ulcers of various aetiology were treated.<br />
This prospective documented group was compared with another group (25 patients,<br />
average age 78), retrospectively. The wounds were fibrinous, sloughy; periwound with<br />
keratosis, desiccated exudate or dressing; max area of wounds approx 60cm2. The<br />
costs at home includes: time, all materials.<br />
Results: The mean cost for single use were similar in both groups (mean: € 30,29<br />
autolytic; € 35,54 debrider*), the results were different (best for debrider*). One use of<br />
the debrider gives a mean of 92% of debrided tissue, 2 uses of autolytic gives 38.4%.<br />
The autolytic requires 8-10 times to give the same results as the debrider*. Using the<br />
debrider* 1 time, the cost saving would be approx € 115 when compared with 5 times<br />
using autolytic. The costs for similar results are lower with the debrider*.<br />
Conclusions: This debrider* is a very fast, effective, safe method to debride wounds in<br />
the homecare / ambulant area; it cares the granulation, it helps to remove bacteria and<br />
is not expensive.<br />
E-POSTER: HEALTH ECONOMICS & OUTCOME<br />
EP 505<br />
EFFICIENCY IN TACKLING WOUNDS<br />
E-Poster: Health Economics & Outcome<br />
Ana Maria Calvo 1 , Carmen Alba 2 , Raquel Contreras 3 , Esther Armans 4<br />
1Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (Salamanca, Spain);<br />
2 Hospital Clínico de Valencia (Valencia, Spain);<br />
3 Centro de Salud Inmaculada Vieira (Sevilla, Spain);<br />
4 Hospital Clinic (Barcelona, Spain).<br />
Introduction: The Spanish National Health Service (NHS) allocates an 8.5% GDP to<br />
attend more than 46 million people, and spends more than 6% of this money in patients<br />
carriers of wounds. In the current crisis, is debated the future of provisions and<br />
sustainability, therefore, the Spanish Association of Vascular Nursing and Wounds<br />
(AEEVH) raises this study<br />
Objectives: Describe Spanish NHS resources offered to patients with wounds of lower<br />
limb. Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cares offered to people with wounds of lower<br />
limb<br />
Material and Methods: Descriptive study of Spanish public resources for patients with<br />
wounds of lower limbs and cost-benefit assessment<br />
Results: There is variability of human and material resources in the 17 regions, 254<br />
hospitals, 2914 health centers and 10,202 consultancies. Telemedicine is available at<br />
hospitals and health centers. Most of professionals who care for patients with wounds do<br />
not have access to costs. The waiting time for the specialist is more than 50 days.<br />
Currently there are 7 units of wounds, led by expert nurses in wounds that support<br />
integrated care streamlining the coordination of professionals and assistance levels<br />
Conclusion: The resources offered in the Spanish NHS to patients with wounds of lower<br />
limbs, are different depending on where the patient lives. Wounds units in Spain have<br />
allowed better understanding of costs and maximization of resources, ensuring a<br />
comprehensive approach, faster and easier. Therefore, this type of units, led by expert<br />
nurses, is emerging as an efficient tool.<br />
288