03.05.2015 Views

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

E-POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />

EP 500<br />

E-Poster: Education<br />

The role of the pharmacist as a member of a multidisciplinary<br />

wound care team – A systematic review<br />

Aisling English 1 , Zena Moore 1<br />

1 RCSI (Dublin, Ireland).<br />

Aim: To conduct a systematic review of the literature to explore the role of the<br />

pharmacist as a member of a multidisciplinary wound care team.<br />

Background: Wounds are a significant global problem impacting negatively on health<br />

and social gain. Due to the complex nature of wounds, a multidisciplinary approach is<br />

required to ensure the delivery of cost effective, efficient care pathways. Pharmacists, as<br />

members of a multidisciplinary wound team, have the potential to contribute to<br />

enhancing patient outcomes and delivery of care. However, their precise role has not<br />

been previously explored in a systematic way, thus this review set out to bridge this<br />

theory-practice gap.<br />

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Electronic databases<br />

were searched including Pubmed, the Cochrane library, EBSCO CINAHL, Ovid<br />

EMBASE, Web of Knowledge and Science Direct. Reference lists, textbooks and<br />

websites were also explored (dates). A data extraction sheet was employed to extract<br />

and summarise all relevant findings of included studies.<br />

Results: Three studies and two reviews were located exploring the role of the<br />

pharmacist in the context of a multidisciplinary wound care team. Three major themes<br />

emerged from these papers which delineated the pharmacist’s contribution to<br />

multidisciplinary wound management. These themes included patient safety, enhanced<br />

clinical outcomes and significant cost avoidance. Such themes were illustrated through<br />

the primary and secondary outcomes of the review, for example, the percentage of<br />

wounds healed, achievement of total pain relief and reduction in overall treatment costs.<br />

However, the studies reviewed were of poor methodological quality, thereby limiting any<br />

firm conclusions which may be drawn from the findings.<br />

Conclusion: This review identified three key areas where the pharmacist contributed to<br />

the outcomes achieved by the multidisciplinary wound team. However, poor<br />

methodological quality of the studies included limit the conclusions which may be drawn<br />

from these findings. Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the role of the<br />

pharmacist as a member of the multidisciplinary wound team.<br />

E-POSTER: HEALTH ECONOMICS & OUTCOME<br />

EP 501<br />

E-Poster: Health Economics & Outcome<br />

PORTABLE SINGLE-USE NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY CAN REDUCE<br />

NPWT TREATMENT COSTS WHILST PROMOTING PATIENT-CENTRED WOUND<br />

CARE<br />

Paul Trueman 1 , Theresa Hurd 2 , Alan Rossington 1<br />

1 Smith & Nephew (Hull, United Kingdom);<br />

2 Nursing Practice Solutions (Ontario, Canada).<br />

Background: The advent of portable single-use negative pressure wound therapy<br />

(NPWT) has the potential to make advanced wound therapy more accessible. Portable,<br />

canister-less NPWT devices reduce the impact of treatment on patients, allowing<br />

improved mobility and less interference with activities of daily living, whilst offering<br />

comparable levels of clinical performance to the larger, traditional NPWT devices.<br />

Furthermore, the cost of portable NPWT is typically lower than comparable treatment<br />

with traditional NPWT.<br />

Aim: The objective of this study was to estimate the potential cost savings that could<br />

result by replacing traditional NPWT with a portable, single-use, canister-less NPWT<br />

system (1) in appropriate patients.<br />

Methods: An historic database of patients treated with traditional NPWT in Canada,<br />

between 2009 and 2012, was reviewed to identify how many patients could have been<br />

treated with portable NPWT. Criteria to identify patients who would have been eligible for<br />

portable NPWT included wound exudate levels, wound size and wound depth.<br />

Results: The findings suggest that between 15% and 50% of patients who were treated<br />

with traditional NPWT could have been effectively treated with portable NPWT. The<br />

weekly cost of portable NPWT is approximately 26% of the weekly cost of traditional<br />

NPWT in Canada.<br />

Conclusion: The adoption of a portfolio approach to NPWT, comprising traditional and<br />

portable NPWT, offers the potential to reduce treatment costs whilst also promoting<br />

patient centred care. Rational adoption of portable NPWT allows for more patients to be<br />

treated with NPWT without increasing budgets.<br />

(1) PICO Single-use NPWT System (Smith & Nephew Ltd., UK)<br />

286

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!