Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
E-POSTER PRESENTATIONS<br />
EP 500<br />
E-Poster: Education<br />
The role of the pharmacist as a member of a multidisciplinary<br />
wound care team – A systematic review<br />
Aisling English 1 , Zena Moore 1<br />
1 RCSI (Dublin, Ireland).<br />
Aim: To conduct a systematic review of the literature to explore the role of the<br />
pharmacist as a member of a multidisciplinary wound care team.<br />
Background: Wounds are a significant global problem impacting negatively on health<br />
and social gain. Due to the complex nature of wounds, a multidisciplinary approach is<br />
required to ensure the delivery of cost effective, efficient care pathways. Pharmacists, as<br />
members of a multidisciplinary wound team, have the potential to contribute to<br />
enhancing patient outcomes and delivery of care. However, their precise role has not<br />
been previously explored in a systematic way, thus this review set out to bridge this<br />
theory-practice gap.<br />
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Electronic databases<br />
were searched including Pubmed, the Cochrane library, EBSCO CINAHL, Ovid<br />
EMBASE, Web of Knowledge and Science Direct. Reference lists, textbooks and<br />
websites were also explored (dates). A data extraction sheet was employed to extract<br />
and summarise all relevant findings of included studies.<br />
Results: Three studies and two reviews were located exploring the role of the<br />
pharmacist in the context of a multidisciplinary wound care team. Three major themes<br />
emerged from these papers which delineated the pharmacist’s contribution to<br />
multidisciplinary wound management. These themes included patient safety, enhanced<br />
clinical outcomes and significant cost avoidance. Such themes were illustrated through<br />
the primary and secondary outcomes of the review, for example, the percentage of<br />
wounds healed, achievement of total pain relief and reduction in overall treatment costs.<br />
However, the studies reviewed were of poor methodological quality, thereby limiting any<br />
firm conclusions which may be drawn from the findings.<br />
Conclusion: This review identified three key areas where the pharmacist contributed to<br />
the outcomes achieved by the multidisciplinary wound team. However, poor<br />
methodological quality of the studies included limit the conclusions which may be drawn<br />
from these findings. Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the role of the<br />
pharmacist as a member of the multidisciplinary wound team.<br />
E-POSTER: HEALTH ECONOMICS & OUTCOME<br />
EP 501<br />
E-Poster: Health Economics & Outcome<br />
PORTABLE SINGLE-USE NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY CAN REDUCE<br />
NPWT TREATMENT COSTS WHILST PROMOTING PATIENT-CENTRED WOUND<br />
CARE<br />
Paul Trueman 1 , Theresa Hurd 2 , Alan Rossington 1<br />
1 Smith & Nephew (Hull, United Kingdom);<br />
2 Nursing Practice Solutions (Ontario, Canada).<br />
Background: The advent of portable single-use negative pressure wound therapy<br />
(NPWT) has the potential to make advanced wound therapy more accessible. Portable,<br />
canister-less NPWT devices reduce the impact of treatment on patients, allowing<br />
improved mobility and less interference with activities of daily living, whilst offering<br />
comparable levels of clinical performance to the larger, traditional NPWT devices.<br />
Furthermore, the cost of portable NPWT is typically lower than comparable treatment<br />
with traditional NPWT.<br />
Aim: The objective of this study was to estimate the potential cost savings that could<br />
result by replacing traditional NPWT with a portable, single-use, canister-less NPWT<br />
system (1) in appropriate patients.<br />
Methods: An historic database of patients treated with traditional NPWT in Canada,<br />
between 2009 and 2012, was reviewed to identify how many patients could have been<br />
treated with portable NPWT. Criteria to identify patients who would have been eligible for<br />
portable NPWT included wound exudate levels, wound size and wound depth.<br />
Results: The findings suggest that between 15% and 50% of patients who were treated<br />
with traditional NPWT could have been effectively treated with portable NPWT. The<br />
weekly cost of portable NPWT is approximately 26% of the weekly cost of traditional<br />
NPWT in Canada.<br />
Conclusion: The adoption of a portfolio approach to NPWT, comprising traditional and<br />
portable NPWT, offers the potential to reduce treatment costs whilst also promoting<br />
patient centred care. Rational adoption of portable NPWT allows for more patients to be<br />
treated with NPWT without increasing budgets.<br />
(1) PICO Single-use NPWT System (Smith & Nephew Ltd., UK)<br />
286