03.05.2015 Views

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FREE PAPER SESSION: DIABETIC FOOT II<br />

Free Paper Session: Diabetic Foot II<br />

154<br />

DO PEOPLE WITH DIABETES HAVE A GREATER RISK OF DEVELOPING ACTIVE<br />

DIABETIC FOOT DISEASE WHEN LIVING WITHIN AN URBAN POPULATION?<br />

Pauline Wilson 1 , Meave Corcoran 1 , Marie Louise healy 1<br />

1 St James’ Hospital (Dublin, Ireland).<br />

Aim: This observational study aims to collate risk stratification data for our area and<br />

compare it to national and international data.<br />

Introduction: It is well documented that assessing the foot of the person with diabetes<br />

is important. Numerous authors have written about the importance of assessing<br />

Neuropathy Status, Vascular status, taking a history and completing an examination as<br />

part of the annual diabetes review. Following this examination an appropriate risk status<br />

is also important to be able to ensure that the patient receives appropriate prevention<br />

and or treatment. Data is available for individual populations globally on their relatively<br />

risk status, however Irish data in this regard was scarce. We hypothesised that those<br />

living in an urban area of social deprivation would be at an increased risk of developing<br />

foot disease and have a higher risk status when compared to international trends<br />

Methods: Building on work done within rural settings we observed the risk status of 503<br />

patients attending an urban diabetes consultant led service for review over a 6 month<br />

period.<br />

Results: Results showed that patients attending this service receiving a comprehensive<br />

foot assessment and stratification following the Scottish model were identified as 78%<br />

Low risk, 14% moderate risk, 7% High risk and 1% active foot disease.<br />

Conclusion: This observational study represents approximately 10% of the diabetes<br />

population. This highlights the need to record data accurately to allow appropriate<br />

resource allocation and compare trends nationally and internationally. This study also<br />

shows that there is no difference between urban and rural populations in relative risk<br />

stratification.<br />

155<br />

Free Paper Session: Diabetic Foot II<br />

Readmissions of patients with Diabetes and foot ulcers after<br />

infra-popliteal bypass surgery: attacking the problem by an<br />

integrated case management model<br />

Gerhard Ruemenapf 1 , Stephan Morbach 2 , Klaus Amendt 3 , Norbert Nagel 4<br />

1 Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus (Speyer, Germany);<br />

2 Marienkrankenhaus (Soest, Germany);<br />

3 Diakonie Krankenhaus (Mannheim, Germany);<br />

4 B.Braun (Melsungen, Germany).<br />

Aim: DFS patients with infrapopliteal bypasses and minor amputation require long-term<br />

wound care. Unfortunately, postoperative outpatient care is frequently inadequate. This is<br />

especially true for Germany, where the in- and outpatient sectors are funded and<br />

managed separately. Thus, many patients are readmitted to the hospital following<br />

successful treatment and discharge. This has both medical and psychical implications for<br />

patients, as well as financial implications for the hospital.<br />

We looked at whether a clinical case management (CM) for outpatient care according to<br />

in-hospital standards might reduce the readmission rate, length of hospital stay (LOS)<br />

and hospital costs.<br />

Methods: Patients with DFS, bypass surgery and minor amputations after<br />

implementation of the CM (n = 376) were compared with a matched historic control<br />

group (HCG; n = 190). Since standard indexes (BRASS, Barthel) were not sensitive<br />

enough to identify patients at the highest risk of readmittance to the hospital, we<br />

developed a specific and sensitive tripartite scoring system based on medical, nursing as<br />

well as social subscores. Integrated trans-sectoral CM care was offered to the 116<br />

patients (CMP) with the highest score.<br />

Results: The readmittance rate was reduced in CMP compared to HCG (8.8 vs. 16.4 %;<br />

p < 0.01). Although initially, the mean LOS was higher in the CMP patients, the reduction<br />

in readmissions improved the hospital´s economic situation, e.g. by increasing the<br />

number of patients treated by 6 %/y.<br />

Conclusion: A hospital-based CM significantly reduces the hospital readmissions in<br />

patients with ischemic DFS following bypass surgery, with lower hospital costs.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />

COPENHAGEN<br />

15-17 May · <strong>2013</strong><br />

Danish Wound<br />

Healing Society<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!