Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FREE PAPER SESSION: DIABETIC FOOT II<br />
Free Paper Session: Diabetic Foot II<br />
154<br />
DO PEOPLE WITH DIABETES HAVE A GREATER RISK OF DEVELOPING ACTIVE<br />
DIABETIC FOOT DISEASE WHEN LIVING WITHIN AN URBAN POPULATION?<br />
Pauline Wilson 1 , Meave Corcoran 1 , Marie Louise healy 1<br />
1 St James’ Hospital (Dublin, Ireland).<br />
Aim: This observational study aims to collate risk stratification data for our area and<br />
compare it to national and international data.<br />
Introduction: It is well documented that assessing the foot of the person with diabetes<br />
is important. Numerous authors have written about the importance of assessing<br />
Neuropathy Status, Vascular status, taking a history and completing an examination as<br />
part of the annual diabetes review. Following this examination an appropriate risk status<br />
is also important to be able to ensure that the patient receives appropriate prevention<br />
and or treatment. Data is available for individual populations globally on their relatively<br />
risk status, however Irish data in this regard was scarce. We hypothesised that those<br />
living in an urban area of social deprivation would be at an increased risk of developing<br />
foot disease and have a higher risk status when compared to international trends<br />
Methods: Building on work done within rural settings we observed the risk status of 503<br />
patients attending an urban diabetes consultant led service for review over a 6 month<br />
period.<br />
Results: Results showed that patients attending this service receiving a comprehensive<br />
foot assessment and stratification following the Scottish model were identified as 78%<br />
Low risk, 14% moderate risk, 7% High risk and 1% active foot disease.<br />
Conclusion: This observational study represents approximately 10% of the diabetes<br />
population. This highlights the need to record data accurately to allow appropriate<br />
resource allocation and compare trends nationally and internationally. This study also<br />
shows that there is no difference between urban and rural populations in relative risk<br />
stratification.<br />
155<br />
Free Paper Session: Diabetic Foot II<br />
Readmissions of patients with Diabetes and foot ulcers after<br />
infra-popliteal bypass surgery: attacking the problem by an<br />
integrated case management model<br />
Gerhard Ruemenapf 1 , Stephan Morbach 2 , Klaus Amendt 3 , Norbert Nagel 4<br />
1 Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus (Speyer, Germany);<br />
2 Marienkrankenhaus (Soest, Germany);<br />
3 Diakonie Krankenhaus (Mannheim, Germany);<br />
4 B.Braun (Melsungen, Germany).<br />
Aim: DFS patients with infrapopliteal bypasses and minor amputation require long-term<br />
wound care. Unfortunately, postoperative outpatient care is frequently inadequate. This is<br />
especially true for Germany, where the in- and outpatient sectors are funded and<br />
managed separately. Thus, many patients are readmitted to the hospital following<br />
successful treatment and discharge. This has both medical and psychical implications for<br />
patients, as well as financial implications for the hospital.<br />
We looked at whether a clinical case management (CM) for outpatient care according to<br />
in-hospital standards might reduce the readmission rate, length of hospital stay (LOS)<br />
and hospital costs.<br />
Methods: Patients with DFS, bypass surgery and minor amputations after<br />
implementation of the CM (n = 376) were compared with a matched historic control<br />
group (HCG; n = 190). Since standard indexes (BRASS, Barthel) were not sensitive<br />
enough to identify patients at the highest risk of readmittance to the hospital, we<br />
developed a specific and sensitive tripartite scoring system based on medical, nursing as<br />
well as social subscores. Integrated trans-sectoral CM care was offered to the 116<br />
patients (CMP) with the highest score.<br />
Results: The readmittance rate was reduced in CMP compared to HCG (8.8 vs. 16.4 %;<br />
p < 0.01). Although initially, the mean LOS was higher in the CMP patients, the reduction<br />
in readmissions improved the hospital´s economic situation, e.g. by increasing the<br />
number of patients treated by 6 %/y.<br />
Conclusion: A hospital-based CM significantly reduces the hospital readmissions in<br />
patients with ischemic DFS following bypass surgery, with lower hospital costs.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />
COPENHAGEN<br />
15-17 May · <strong>2013</strong><br />
Danish Wound<br />
Healing Society<br />
97