03.05.2015 Views

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ORAL PRESENTATIONS<br />

172<br />

Free Paper Session: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy<br />

NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY WITH INSTILLATION (NPWTi) BETTER<br />

REDUCES POST DEBRIDEMENT BIOBURDEN IN CHRONICALLY INFECTED<br />

LOWER EXTREMITY WOUNDS THAN NPWT ALONE<br />

John Lantis 1 , Cynthia Gendics 1 , Jamie Schwartz 1 , Ema Avdagic 1<br />

1 St Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital; Columbia University (New York, United States).<br />

Aim: Overabundance of bacteria in the chronic wound plays a significant role in the<br />

decreased ability to primarily close these wounds. We undertook a prospective study to<br />

assess the efficacy two methods of aggressive wound bed preparation. algorithm versus<br />

one employing sharp surgical debridement and NPWTi.<br />

Methods: 16 patients with greater than 105 bacteria in their lower leg and foot wounds<br />

were taken to the OR and debrided and randomized to receive one week of NPWT or<br />

NPWTi (with.25% Dakins solution at 10 min dwell, 60 min vacuum at negative 125<br />

mmHg). Quantitative cultures were taken at day 0,4, and 7.<br />

Results: The NPWTi vs NPWT post debridement wound sizes were 84.25 cm 2 (±89.26<br />

cm 2 ) vs 17.29 cm 2 (5.03 cm 2 ),after debridement there were 3 (±1) types of bacteria in<br />

each wound, and of those bacteria there were 3.7x106 (±4x106) colony forming units<br />

(CFUs) vs 1.8x106(±2.36x106). At one week the bacterial counts were 2 (±1) types of<br />

bacteria per wound (p=0.17), and 2.6 x105 (±3x105) vs 2.79x106 (3.18x106) (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!