Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
POSTER: DRESSINGS<br />
Poster: Dressings<br />
P 268<br />
IMPLEMENTING A TWO-TIERED GLOBAL SCHEME FOR EVALUATING WOUND<br />
DRESSING EFFICACY<br />
John G. Thomas 1<br />
1 West Virginia University (Morgantown, United States).<br />
Aim: To compare silver wound dressing efficacy, we developed a standardized battery<br />
of 5 organisms using 5 biochemical characteristics. <strong>Here</strong>, we, integrated a two tiered<br />
strategy of 1) 10 global organisms, from different diseases and mechanisms of<br />
resistance with 2) five methods of efficacy testing; by employing a coding system, a 12<br />
digit classification could be obtained to compare dressing.<br />
Methods: The organism battery included MRSA, VRE, and Staph aureus, and E. coli,<br />
and Kleb pneumonia, EBBL+ and – for each and P. aeruginosa. Organisms were coded<br />
from wounds, respiratory, and burn infections, WVUH, national and/or international<br />
regions with known MICs. The 5 test battery included C-ZOI with and without<br />
bioluminescent bacteria, flow cytometry, ratio of planktonic-biofilm phenotype, and<br />
BARDOT, a laser scatter fingerprint. Organism description utilized 2 letters with results<br />
coded as to Typical, Emerging, Atypical, with integers of 1, 2, or 3; patterns for both<br />
organisms and test type allowed comparison and a searchable 12 digit number.<br />
Results: Three different silver containing dressing (X/Y/Z) were assayed. Greatest<br />
differences in organism coding were highlighted by 1)mechanism of resistance (ESBL)<br />
2) and wound type (burns), followed by 3)Gram stain and organism, MRSA. The best<br />
test battery for dressing differentiation focused on 1) FC and 2) bioluminescent C-ZOI.<br />
The combined codes of 12 integers allowed for digital tracking and efficacy ranking.<br />
Conclusion: To standardize silver dressing evaluations, we designed a 2 part<br />
classification system based on multiple parameters, while building a unique, searchable<br />
library.<br />
P 269<br />
The right choice of dressing makes the difference in the<br />
treatment of malignant wounds<br />
Poster: Dressings<br />
Susanne Dufva 1 , Liselott Sahlberg 1 , Kerstin Granhäll Olson 1<br />
1 Department of oncology, Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden).<br />
Background: Malignant fungating wounds (MFW) result from cutaneous infiltration by<br />
carcinogenic cells. Odour, exudate, pain, bleeding and infection are common symptoms<br />
that add to the physical and psychological suffering of patients with MFW. The main<br />
challenges are related to malodour, pain and difficulties in applying the wound dressings.<br />
Patients are often treated by several different health care professionals, meeting a lack<br />
of consistency in the protocol of care and limited time resources for dressing change.<br />
Therefore it is important to standardise the treatment by providing an All-in-one<br />
dressings for easy and quick application.<br />
Aim: The aim of the study is to demonstrate the excellence of a new foam dressing in<br />
the suppotive care of malignant fungating wounds on patients with mamma or head and<br />
neck cancer.<br />
Methods: Over a period of 4 weeks the dressing will be clinical evaluated on 5-10<br />
patients with low to moderate exuding wounds. The endpoints are frequency of change,<br />
ease of use, absorption capacity, patient experience of wound pain, wound odour, periwound<br />
skin condition and overall satisfaction with the dressing.<br />
Results: The results will be presented as case series including photos of the wound<br />
conditions.<br />
Conclusions: Todays standard of care is water, soap and a skin barrier on the<br />
periwound area. Primarily a hydrofiber dressing is applied, seconded by a polyurethane<br />
foam dressing with silicone boarder. This study will demonstrate the outcome when<br />
choosing a new gelling foam dressing.<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />
COPENHAGEN<br />
15-17 May · <strong>2013</strong><br />
Danish Wound<br />
Healing Society<br />
163