03.05.2015 Views

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

POSTER: DRESSINGS<br />

Poster: Dressings<br />

P 268<br />

IMPLEMENTING A TWO-TIERED GLOBAL SCHEME FOR EVALUATING WOUND<br />

DRESSING EFFICACY<br />

John G. Thomas 1<br />

1 West Virginia University (Morgantown, United States).<br />

Aim: To compare silver wound dressing efficacy, we developed a standardized battery<br />

of 5 organisms using 5 biochemical characteristics. <strong>Here</strong>, we, integrated a two tiered<br />

strategy of 1) 10 global organisms, from different diseases and mechanisms of<br />

resistance with 2) five methods of efficacy testing; by employing a coding system, a 12<br />

digit classification could be obtained to compare dressing.<br />

Methods: The organism battery included MRSA, VRE, and Staph aureus, and E. coli,<br />

and Kleb pneumonia, EBBL+ and – for each and P. aeruginosa. Organisms were coded<br />

from wounds, respiratory, and burn infections, WVUH, national and/or international<br />

regions with known MICs. The 5 test battery included C-ZOI with and without<br />

bioluminescent bacteria, flow cytometry, ratio of planktonic-biofilm phenotype, and<br />

BARDOT, a laser scatter fingerprint. Organism description utilized 2 letters with results<br />

coded as to Typical, Emerging, Atypical, with integers of 1, 2, or 3; patterns for both<br />

organisms and test type allowed comparison and a searchable 12 digit number.<br />

Results: Three different silver containing dressing (X/Y/Z) were assayed. Greatest<br />

differences in organism coding were highlighted by 1)mechanism of resistance (ESBL)<br />

2) and wound type (burns), followed by 3)Gram stain and organism, MRSA. The best<br />

test battery for dressing differentiation focused on 1) FC and 2) bioluminescent C-ZOI.<br />

The combined codes of 12 integers allowed for digital tracking and efficacy ranking.<br />

Conclusion: To standardize silver dressing evaluations, we designed a 2 part<br />

classification system based on multiple parameters, while building a unique, searchable<br />

library.<br />

P 269<br />

The right choice of dressing makes the difference in the<br />

treatment of malignant wounds<br />

Poster: Dressings<br />

Susanne Dufva 1 , Liselott Sahlberg 1 , Kerstin Granhäll Olson 1<br />

1 Department of oncology, Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden).<br />

Background: Malignant fungating wounds (MFW) result from cutaneous infiltration by<br />

carcinogenic cells. Odour, exudate, pain, bleeding and infection are common symptoms<br />

that add to the physical and psychological suffering of patients with MFW. The main<br />

challenges are related to malodour, pain and difficulties in applying the wound dressings.<br />

Patients are often treated by several different health care professionals, meeting a lack<br />

of consistency in the protocol of care and limited time resources for dressing change.<br />

Therefore it is important to standardise the treatment by providing an All-in-one<br />

dressings for easy and quick application.<br />

Aim: The aim of the study is to demonstrate the excellence of a new foam dressing in<br />

the suppotive care of malignant fungating wounds on patients with mamma or head and<br />

neck cancer.<br />

Methods: Over a period of 4 weeks the dressing will be clinical evaluated on 5-10<br />

patients with low to moderate exuding wounds. The endpoints are frequency of change,<br />

ease of use, absorption capacity, patient experience of wound pain, wound odour, periwound<br />

skin condition and overall satisfaction with the dressing.<br />

Results: The results will be presented as case series including photos of the wound<br />

conditions.<br />

Conclusions: Todays standard of care is water, soap and a skin barrier on the<br />

periwound area. Primarily a hydrofiber dressing is applied, seconded by a polyurethane<br />

foam dressing with silicone boarder. This study will demonstrate the outcome when<br />

choosing a new gelling foam dressing.<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />

COPENHAGEN<br />

15-17 May · <strong>2013</strong><br />

Danish Wound<br />

Healing Society<br />

163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!