03.05.2015 Views

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FREE PAPER SESSION: PRESSURE ULCERS AND HEALTH ECONOMICS<br />

Free Paper Session: Pressure Ulcers and Health Economics<br />

146<br />

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN ULTRASOUND FINDINGS AND CLINICAL<br />

ASSESSMENT OF PRESSURE RELATED ULCERS: IS THE EXTENT OF INJUY<br />

GREATER THAN WHAT IS PREDICTED?<br />

Kristen Aliano 1,2 , Christopher Low 1,2 , Steve Stavrides 1,2 , Johnathan Luchs 1,2 ,<br />

Thomas Davenport 1,2<br />

1 Long Island Plastic Surgical Group (Garden City, United States);<br />

2 Winthrop University Hospital (Mineola, United States).<br />

Aim: The current staging system by the U.S.’s National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />

(NPUAP) classifies the stages of pressure ulcers based on clinical assessment and<br />

visual inspection. We postulate that patients presenting with clinically superficial stage I<br />

wounds will have a greater depth of injury than predicted.<br />

Methods: On admission, patients with sacral pressure ulcers were staged. Patients who<br />

were classified as having a stage I or II pressure wounds or suspected deep tissue injury<br />

were assessed with high-frequency (12-MHZ) ultrasonography (US) to identify any<br />

evidence of injury to the deep tissue. Those patients classified as having stage III or IV<br />

were excluded from the study.<br />

Results: The study included 17 patients; 9 patients with Stage I pressure ulcers and 8<br />

patients with suspected deep tissue injury. In all patients, the US demonstrated evidence<br />

of injury to the deeper tissue layers. The abnormal sonographic signs indicating deep<br />

tissue injury included loss of epidermal-dermal interface.<br />

Conclusions: The current staging system has expanded to include suspected deep<br />

tissue injury as an additional stage. In patients with suspected deep tissue injury, we<br />

have found US to be a reliable diagnostic tool that confirms the clinical suspicion of deep<br />

tissue injury. Interestingly, for the stage I pressure ulcers that appeared clinically<br />

superficial, the US revealed evidence of associated deep tissue injury. This suggests<br />

that pressure wounds classified as superficial may have a deeper tissue damage<br />

component.<br />

147<br />

Free Paper Session: Pressure Ulcers and Health Economics<br />

THE BORDER TRIAL: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF<br />

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTI-LAYER SILICONE DRESSINGS IN PREVENTING<br />

INTENSIVE CARE UNIT PRESSURE ULCERS<br />

Nick Santamaria 1 , Marie Gerdtz 1 , Theresa Vassiliou 1 , Jonathan Knott 1 ,<br />

Stepanie DeVincentis 2 , Sarah Sage 2 , Ai Wei Ng 2 , Jane McCann 2 , Amy Freeman 2 ,<br />

Wei Liu 2<br />

1 University of Melbourne & Royal Melbourne Hospital (Melbourne, Australia);<br />

2 Royal Melbourne Hospital (Melbourne, Australia).<br />

Pressure ulcers are a major source of morbidity in critically ill patients in the Intensive<br />

Care Unit (ICU) and are often associated with tissue damage prior to the ICU admission.<br />

Early identification and preventative management of patients at risk while in the<br />

Emergency Department (ED) may reduce the pressure ulcer incidence rates in the ICU.<br />

Aim: To determine the effectiveness of applying multi-layer silicone dressings* in the ED<br />

in preventing sacral and heel pressure ulcer development in critically ill patients<br />

transferred to ICU.<br />

Methods: A randomised control trial was conducted with critically ill patients admitted to<br />

the ED and subsequently transferred to the ICU. Eligible patients (n=440) were assigned<br />

to either a control group receiving usual pressure prevention care or to an intervention<br />

group receiving usual care and the application of multi-layer silicone dressings to their<br />

sacrum and heels in the ED. The primary outcome measure was the pressure ulcer<br />

incidence rate in ICU.<br />

Results: When compared with the control group, there was significantly less patients<br />

with a pressure ulcer (p=0.002), less total ulcers (p=0.003) and fewer sacral (p=0.03)<br />

and heel pressure ulcers (p=0.005) in the intervention group.<br />

Conclusions: The application of silicone dressings was effective in preventing sacral<br />

and heel pressure ulcer development in critically ill patients.<br />

* Mepilex ® Border Sacrum and Heel dressings<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />

COPENHAGEN<br />

15-17 May · <strong>2013</strong><br />

Danish Wound<br />

Healing Society<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!