You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FREE PAPER SESSION: PRESSURE ULCERS AND HEALTH ECONOMICS<br />
Free Paper Session: Pressure Ulcers and Health Economics<br />
146<br />
THE CORRELATION BETWEEN ULTRASOUND FINDINGS AND CLINICAL<br />
ASSESSMENT OF PRESSURE RELATED ULCERS: IS THE EXTENT OF INJUY<br />
GREATER THAN WHAT IS PREDICTED?<br />
Kristen Aliano 1,2 , Christopher Low 1,2 , Steve Stavrides 1,2 , Johnathan Luchs 1,2 ,<br />
Thomas Davenport 1,2<br />
1 Long Island Plastic Surgical Group (Garden City, United States);<br />
2 Winthrop University Hospital (Mineola, United States).<br />
Aim: The current staging system by the U.S.’s National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />
(NPUAP) classifies the stages of pressure ulcers based on clinical assessment and<br />
visual inspection. We postulate that patients presenting with clinically superficial stage I<br />
wounds will have a greater depth of injury than predicted.<br />
Methods: On admission, patients with sacral pressure ulcers were staged. Patients who<br />
were classified as having a stage I or II pressure wounds or suspected deep tissue injury<br />
were assessed with high-frequency (12-MHZ) ultrasonography (US) to identify any<br />
evidence of injury to the deep tissue. Those patients classified as having stage III or IV<br />
were excluded from the study.<br />
Results: The study included 17 patients; 9 patients with Stage I pressure ulcers and 8<br />
patients with suspected deep tissue injury. In all patients, the US demonstrated evidence<br />
of injury to the deeper tissue layers. The abnormal sonographic signs indicating deep<br />
tissue injury included loss of epidermal-dermal interface.<br />
Conclusions: The current staging system has expanded to include suspected deep<br />
tissue injury as an additional stage. In patients with suspected deep tissue injury, we<br />
have found US to be a reliable diagnostic tool that confirms the clinical suspicion of deep<br />
tissue injury. Interestingly, for the stage I pressure ulcers that appeared clinically<br />
superficial, the US revealed evidence of associated deep tissue injury. This suggests<br />
that pressure wounds classified as superficial may have a deeper tissue damage<br />
component.<br />
147<br />
Free Paper Session: Pressure Ulcers and Health Economics<br />
THE BORDER TRIAL: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF<br />
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTI-LAYER SILICONE DRESSINGS IN PREVENTING<br />
INTENSIVE CARE UNIT PRESSURE ULCERS<br />
Nick Santamaria 1 , Marie Gerdtz 1 , Theresa Vassiliou 1 , Jonathan Knott 1 ,<br />
Stepanie DeVincentis 2 , Sarah Sage 2 , Ai Wei Ng 2 , Jane McCann 2 , Amy Freeman 2 ,<br />
Wei Liu 2<br />
1 University of Melbourne & Royal Melbourne Hospital (Melbourne, Australia);<br />
2 Royal Melbourne Hospital (Melbourne, Australia).<br />
Pressure ulcers are a major source of morbidity in critically ill patients in the Intensive<br />
Care Unit (ICU) and are often associated with tissue damage prior to the ICU admission.<br />
Early identification and preventative management of patients at risk while in the<br />
Emergency Department (ED) may reduce the pressure ulcer incidence rates in the ICU.<br />
Aim: To determine the effectiveness of applying multi-layer silicone dressings* in the ED<br />
in preventing sacral and heel pressure ulcer development in critically ill patients<br />
transferred to ICU.<br />
Methods: A randomised control trial was conducted with critically ill patients admitted to<br />
the ED and subsequently transferred to the ICU. Eligible patients (n=440) were assigned<br />
to either a control group receiving usual pressure prevention care or to an intervention<br />
group receiving usual care and the application of multi-layer silicone dressings to their<br />
sacrum and heels in the ED. The primary outcome measure was the pressure ulcer<br />
incidence rate in ICU.<br />
Results: When compared with the control group, there was significantly less patients<br />
with a pressure ulcer (p=0.002), less total ulcers (p=0.003) and fewer sacral (p=0.03)<br />
and heel pressure ulcers (p=0.005) in the intervention group.<br />
Conclusions: The application of silicone dressings was effective in preventing sacral<br />
and heel pressure ulcer development in critically ill patients.<br />
* Mepilex ® Border Sacrum and Heel dressings<br />
<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />
COPENHAGEN<br />
15-17 May · <strong>2013</strong><br />
Danish Wound<br />
Healing Society<br />
93