03.05.2015 Views

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P 281<br />

Poster: Dressings<br />

A NOVEL QUANTITATIVE CZOI BIOFILM ASSAY BASED ON 3D SOFT TISSUE<br />

Linnea Karlsson Lönnberg 1 , Eva Larkö 1 , Kristina Blom 1 , Bodil Hakonen 1<br />

1 Medibiome AB (Mölnlycke, Sweden).<br />

Aim: To develop a method mimicking reality based on 3D soft tissue where biofilm is<br />

formed and the antimicrobial activity of wound dressings can be screened and compared<br />

qualitatively and quantitatively.<br />

Method: 3D soft tissue (allowing biofilm formation) was made and inoculated with<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa before application of dressings. After incubation for 24h,<br />

corrected zone of inhibition (CZOI) was viewed and measured. Thereafter, the bacterial<br />

burden in dressings and soft tissues were analyzed separately. CZOI analyses run on<br />

Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) were run for comparison. Dressings included were: silver<br />

containing hydrofiber (SCH) and silver containing foams (SCFI and SCFII (± prehydration))<br />

and their counterparts without silver.<br />

Results: CZOI could be viewed on 3D soft tissues and found bigger for the SCFs than<br />

for the SCH. The opposite was observed when using MHA where the CZOI was bigger<br />

for the SCH unless the SCFII was pre-hydrated. The bacterial burden in the dressings<br />

and in the soft tissues could be analyzed and was reduced with several logs for the<br />

SCFs and less than 1 log for the SCH compared with their counterparts.<br />

Conclusion: This biofilm method based on 3D soft tissue offers an in vivo relevant<br />

model to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the antimicrobial activity of wound<br />

dressing independent of their physical properties and without the need for pre-hydration.<br />

Results could reflect the accessibility of silver to act on biofilm; SCH contains 10x less<br />

silver than the SCFs.<br />

Poster: Dressings<br />

P 280<br />

Who is who in chronic wound dressing. A new pragmatic algorithm.<br />

Bernd Gächter 1 , Sebastian Probst 2 , Stephane Schlunke 1 , Paul Biegger 1<br />

1 Institute for surgery / ospedale regionale di locarno (Locarno, Switzerland);<br />

2 ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften (Winterthur, Switzerland).<br />

Aim: The aim of this study is to present an algorithm, that was applied by all medical<br />

and non-medical staff that reduced the number of possible „errors“ as well as the<br />

consumption costs by 30% in our wound outpatient clinic as in daily practice of<br />

outpatients and hospital care of chronic wounds, the plethora of possible dressings and<br />

treatments often leads to misunderstanding and confusion.<br />

Methods: A pre- and post-design was used to test a wound algoritm. Based on a<br />

decennial experience in our wound ambulatory (selected and exemplary cases will be<br />

presented) and on current literature, we developed and confirmed a new decisional<br />

algorithm for daily practice for inpatients and outpatients.<br />

Results: The clinical and economical outcome of our patients the year before and after<br />

the application of the above mentioned algorithm, showing a net benefit of 20% faster<br />

ulcer healing and 30% cheaper treatment was measured. A detailed classification of our<br />

patient population and the ready to use algorithm will be presented.<br />

Conclusions: As seen lately with the application of simple measures like a preoperative<br />

check-list based on the World Health Organization (WHO), our treatment<br />

algorithm does warrant us very satisfying results.<br />

POSTER: DRESSINGS<br />

<strong>EWMA</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />

COPENHAGEN<br />

15-17 May · <strong>2013</strong><br />

Danish Wound<br />

Healing Society<br />

169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!