03.05.2015 Views

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

Here - EWMA 2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ORAL PRESENTATIONS<br />

29<br />

Free Paper Session: Dressings and Wound Assessment<br />

PERISTOMAL COMPLICATIONS IN OLD AGE – RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS<br />

Andrea Pokorná 1 , Monika Antonová 2<br />

1 Masary university, Faculty of Medicine, department of Nursing (Brno, Czech Republic);<br />

2 Teaching Hospital Brno (Brno, Czech Republic).<br />

Aim: The contribution is focused on caring for the elderly patients with stoma in relation<br />

to the occurrence of parastomal complications.<br />

The main goal was to evaluate the incidence of peristomal complications in a sample of<br />

the senior population with a stoma and to asses the influence of factors which influence<br />

the observed incidence of these complications (age, level of the self care, cognitive<br />

functions, nutritional status – etc.).<br />

Methods: The retrospective analysis of documentation was used (2006 till 2011). For<br />

the objectification of some measured data standardized rating scales were used (ADL,<br />

BMI, for cognitive function evaluation MMSE and DET Score). For statistical evaluation<br />

Pearson’s chi-square test and Mann Whitney U test were used. The investigation<br />

examined 192 elderly patients over the age of 65 years. Age variance ranged from 65 to<br />

97 years. Average age was 75.18 years (SD 7.42).<br />

Results: Most of the patients had a colostomy (115) rest had ileostomy (77). 138<br />

patients (71.9 %) had peristomal complications. 90% of the complications occurred<br />

within 36 weeks after surgery, leading to the establishment of the stoma, more<br />

complications occurred in ileostomy, which also had an earlier and faster increase in the<br />

incidence of complications. The most common skin complication was maceration (29.7<br />

%).<br />

Conclusions: Patients in the home care services had higher percentage of peristomal<br />

complications (p 0,005). The time period from surgery is statistically significantly<br />

associated with the occurrence of peristomal complications (p 0,005) as well as age<br />

(p 0,000).<br />

FREE PAPER SESSION: DRESSINGS AND WOUND ASSESSMENT<br />

30<br />

Free Paper Session: Dressings and Wound Assessment<br />

THE USE OF HUMAN AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE AS A PRIMARY DRESSING<br />

MATERIAL IN ACUTE AND CHRONIC WOUNDS<br />

Mohammad Khaleel Baghdadi 1 , Tauqeer Ahmed Malik 1 , Ahmed Afandi 1 ,<br />

Nashat Ghandoura 2 , Kareemuddin Mohammad Majid 1 , Samia Faraj Mushara 2<br />

1 King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia);<br />

2 King Fahad General Hospital (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia).<br />

Aim: The use of human amniotic membrane as a primary dressing material in acute and<br />

chronic wounds.<br />

Methods: Human Amniotic Membrane (HAM) is extracted under strict sterile conditions<br />

during an elective C section in an operating room. Written consent is obtained from<br />

HIV1, HIV2, HTLV, HBV, HCV and Syphilis negative mothers. HAM is washed with<br />

normal saline to remove blood clots and then preserved in normal saline in a sterile<br />

container with 160 mg of Gentamicin. Patients are screened for seronegativity. Patients<br />

with Diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcers and acute wounds are selected. Swabs for<br />

culture and sensitivity are taken from wounds and from the HAM before application.<br />

Written consent is obtained from recipients. HAM is applied as a primary dressing with<br />

non adherent silicon dressing to protect the membrane. Dressing is done as an OPD<br />

under sterile protocols. Dressing is changed one to two times a week. Photographs are<br />

taken at all stages of wound treatment.<br />

Results: 68 patients are treated with HAM: Diabetic Foot: 35, Crush Injuries:7, Burn:14,<br />

Pressure ulcers 8, Post operative 4. Complete healing was achieved in 95 percent of<br />

patients.<br />

Conclusions: With HAM healing was faster with no adverse affects. HAM is HLA<br />

negative, donates epithelium, has many growth factors, antibacterial properties and has<br />

minimal stroma. It is readily available, easy to harvest, preserve and easy to apply. It is<br />

cost effective as compared to advanced dressings. It reduces patient’s daily visits to<br />

hospital. We are including more patients from other hospitals in this study.<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!