P ionsPP haveP contactPoster Session, Thursday, June 17Theme F686 - N1123The Creation of Hydrophobic Clay Surfaces with Long Cha<strong>in</strong> Hydrocarbon111UH. Hasan YolcuUP P*, Ahmet GürsesP P, and Met<strong>in</strong> AçkyldzP P,1PAtaturk University, K.K. Education Faculty, Dep. of Chemistry, 25240 ErzurumAbstract- In this study, the presence of lotus effect for the clay modified by us<strong>in</strong>g long cha<strong>in</strong> hydrocarbon was <strong>in</strong>vestigated. It wasfound the powder sample comparison with pellet form exhibits super hydrophobic character. This may be attributed to the chang<strong>in</strong>g ofroughness on the surface of modified clay particles depend<strong>in</strong>g on press<strong>in</strong>g and to the creat<strong>in</strong>g of higher energy surface with the adsorption oflong cha<strong>in</strong> hydrocarbon onto <strong>in</strong>terlayer region of clay.Non wettable surfaces with high water contact angle(WCA) and facile slid<strong>in</strong>g of drops are called superhydrophobic surface. Superhydrophobic surfaces with0water contact angles larger than 150P received a lotof research attention, due to important applications rang<strong>in</strong>gfrom self clean<strong>in</strong>g materials to microfluidic devices [1, 2].Many surfaces <strong>in</strong> nature are highly hydrophobic and selfclean<strong>in</strong>g (e.g. lotus leaves). The design synthesis andapplication of new k<strong>in</strong>ds of super hydrophobic and selfclean<strong>in</strong>g organic or <strong>in</strong>organic material will be essential andimportant task to fulfill [3].The clay sample was purified by sedimentation, dried atvacuum oven and sieved to give a 38-85 m (>%92) sizefraction us<strong>in</strong>g ASTM Standard sieves. Different amountsof hydrocarbon (0.05-1.0 g) was mixed with 500 mLaqueous solutions of CTAB (100, 200, 240, 260, 300, and320 mg/L). The mixture was shaken at 293 K, for 30 m<strong>in</strong>sand 1g clay sample was added to this mixture and shakenfor 30 m<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> a thermostatic shaker at 200 rpm. Themodified clay samples which produced by aboveprocedure were filtered through filter paper of Whatman41 and dried at 383 K <strong>in</strong> a vacuum oven for 2 h.and water droplets leads to ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the hydrophobiccharacter of samples. But the powder organoclay hassuperhydrophobic character, probably due to lotus effect.The variation of <strong>in</strong>itial CTAB concentration doesn’tsignificantly affect the contact angles of the pellet andpowder samples (Figure 2).Figure 2. Effect of <strong>in</strong>itial CTAB concentration on the contactangleIntensity (counts)200016001200800Raw clay*Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author: HThasanyolcu@atauni.edu.trT[1] M. Ma and R. M. Hill. Curr. Op<strong>in</strong>. Colloid Interface Sci. 11,193-202 (2006).[2] A. Tuteja, et al. Science. 318, 1618 -1622 (2007).[3] X , Feng and L, Jiang,. Adv. Mater. 18, 3063-3078 (2006).[4] H.Y. Erbil et al, Science. 299, 1377 (2003).40002 12 22 322Theta (deg)Figure 1. X-ray diffraction spectrums for raw clay and producedorgano-clayThe XRD patterns shows the <strong>in</strong>tensities of peaks for theorgano-clay sample were significantly decreased withcompared the raw clay. This attributed to the presence ofexfoliated clay layers. It can be said that the basal spac<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>creases, depend<strong>in</strong>g on ion-exchange occurred between+CTAP bounded hydrocarbon and the cations <strong>in</strong> the<strong>in</strong>terlayer region of clay (Figure 1).In this work, the contact angles for the powderorganoclay sample and pellet form were compared. It was0found that powder samples have 146P angle<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the presence of lotus effect. On the other hand,the surface roughness of modified clay particles changesdepend<strong>in</strong>g on press<strong>in</strong>g and the contact angle values0measured on the pellet reduce to about 90 P P. This showsthat the effect of surface roughness on the hydrophobiccharacter is predom<strong>in</strong>ant comparison with surface energy.Water droplets cannot penetrate <strong>in</strong>to the pores of thehydrophobic surfaces due to the trapped air [4]. In the bothforms, the reduc<strong>in</strong>g of contact areas between the surface6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, 2010 735
PP scatter<strong>in</strong>gPYusufPP Correspond<strong>in</strong>gPoster Session, Thursday, June 17Theme F686 - N1123Polymer-Nano-Particle Interaction Influence on The Rheology of Non-Newtonian Fluids11UBurcu ÖzelUP P* andP P Z. MenceloluP1PFaculty of Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul 34956, TurkeyAbstract-The aim of the present study is to systematical <strong>in</strong>vestigation of physicochemical parameter <strong>in</strong>fluence on the rheology of shearthicken<strong>in</strong>g/shear th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g behaviour of nano particles <strong>in</strong>tegrated polymeric fluids (also referred to as colloidal nanoparticle suspension, CNS) toshed a light on the mechanism beh<strong>in</strong>d the dilatant behaviour of CNS, which is an ongo<strong>in</strong>g controversial issue <strong>in</strong> the relevant literature.Most of the chemical and allied process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustriesencountered non-newtonian flow behavior; namely shearth<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g and shear thicken<strong>in</strong>g. Shear th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g is a decrease ofviscosity with <strong>in</strong>crease shear rate, although less common, theopposite effect shear thicken<strong>in</strong>g occur <strong>in</strong> various k<strong>in</strong>ds offluids. Shear thicken<strong>in</strong>g is often observed <strong>in</strong> highlyconcentrated colloidal dispersions, characterized by significant<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> viscosity with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g shear rate.There has been significant effort to understand the thestructural orig<strong>in</strong> of the shear thicken<strong>in</strong>g and differentexplanations have been given; namely, the hydrodynamiccluster<strong>in</strong>g and order-to-disorder transition. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to orderdisorder transition (ODT), monodisperse particles hexagonallypacked with<strong>in</strong> the layers but flow <strong>in</strong>stability <strong>in</strong>duce theparticle break out of their ordered layer cause <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong>particle <strong>in</strong>teraction and <strong>in</strong>duce rise <strong>in</strong> viscosity of the[1]suspension at the critical shear rate.PPThe second theory,hydrodynamic cluster<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>volves the hydrodynamic force[2-4]driven flocculation of particles.PPThese theories were[1-5]concluded from light/neutronPexperiments as[2,3]well as from Stokesian Dynamic simulationsP howeverODT theory <strong>in</strong>vestigated by these techniques can not expla<strong>in</strong>the shear thicken<strong>in</strong>g behavior of polydisperse and irregularparticle suspensions. All concentrated suspensions under rightconditions can exhibit the shear thicken<strong>in</strong>g behaviour,however, the exact conditions and the orig<strong>in</strong> of shearthicken<strong>in</strong>g behaviour are not well understood.In this study, we studied the effect of constituent parameters;particle size, concentration, surface chemistry, cont<strong>in</strong>uousphases, molecular weight and polarity of polymeric phase onthe rheology of non-newtonian fluids.The most important parameter for the shear thicken<strong>in</strong>gbehavior is the colloidal <strong>in</strong>teractions between filler particlesand polymeric fluids. To be able to study the effect of thecolloidal <strong>in</strong>teractions on the rheology of CNS, hydrophobic /hydrophilic fumed silica <strong>in</strong> the cont<strong>in</strong>uous liquid phase withdifferent degrees of polarity have also been studied.Viscoelastic characterization <strong>in</strong>dicate that colloidal<strong>in</strong>teractions between particles and cont<strong>in</strong>uous phase and<strong>in</strong>teraction strenght can be tailored by modify<strong>in</strong>g the surfacechemistry of silica particles or chang<strong>in</strong>g the polarity of thecont<strong>in</strong>uous phase (see figure). The relative strength of the<strong>in</strong>teractions between particle-liquid, liquid-liquid and particleparticledeterm<strong>in</strong>e whether dispersion is sol or gel. Sol showsshear thicken<strong>in</strong>g behavior under shear while gel shows shearth<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g behavior.Although substantial number of researches have been studyon the rheology of non-newtonian flow, the nature of the shearthicken<strong>in</strong>g behavior of colloidal suspension are not clearlyunderstood until recently. Hydrodynamic cluster<strong>in</strong>g and orderdisorder transition theories are not reasonable model toexpla<strong>in</strong> our results because most of the studies <strong>in</strong> literature<strong>in</strong>vestigate the rheology of suspensions that are composed ofmonodisperse/nonagglomerated sphere particle. In our case,primary flow units are composed of flocs which arepolydisperse, irregular and anisotropic structures, flocstructure was observed <strong>in</strong> cryoscopic transmission electronmicrographs and observed hydrodynamic radius wassupported by dynamic light analysis. We designed anexperiment <strong>in</strong> order to support new theory about the orig<strong>in</strong> ofshear thicken<strong>in</strong>g. Polyethylene glycol and hydrophilic fumedsilica is known to exhibit shear thicken<strong>in</strong>g behaviour. In thisHTprelim<strong>in</strong>aryTH study, lithyum chloride is dissolved <strong>in</strong>polyethylene glycol to make it conductive hence mixture iscomposed of <strong>in</strong>sulat<strong>in</strong>g particles and conductive cont<strong>in</strong>uousmedia. Conductivity of system was measured dur<strong>in</strong>g viscosityanalysis and decrease <strong>in</strong> conductivity of system at criticalshear rate give a clue about the mechanism of this rheologicalbehaviour. Decrease <strong>in</strong> conductivity at critical shear rate<strong>in</strong>dicate that effective volume fraction of <strong>in</strong>sulat<strong>in</strong>g particle<strong>in</strong>crease therefore resistivity of system <strong>in</strong>crease. As aconclusion, we believe that shear thicken<strong>in</strong>g is not driven bythese two theories that are suggested by publications. It is dueto shear driven reduction of cluster size, as a consequence,well disperse particles <strong>in</strong>crease of the effective volumefraction of particles <strong>in</strong> dispersion.abFigure 1. Viscoelastic characterization of (a) shear thicken<strong>in</strong>g (b)shear th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g fluids*author: burcugenc@su.sabanciuniv.edu[1] R.L. Hoffmann, J.Colloid Interface Science 1972, 16, 155–173[2]G.Bossis, J.F.Brady, J.Chem.Phys. 1989, 91, 1866–1874[3] D.R.Foss, J.F.Brady, J. Fluid Mech. 2000, 407, 167-200[4] B.J.Maranzano, N.J.Wagner, J. Rheol. 2001, 45 , 1205–1222[5] H.M.Laun, R.Bung, S.Hess, W.Loose, O.Hess, K. Hahn,E.Hadicke, R. H<strong>in</strong>gmann, F.Schmidt and P.L<strong>in</strong>dner, J. Rheol. 1992,36, 743.6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, 2010 736
- Page 1:
Poster Presentations3rd Day17 June
- Page 4 and 5:
Determination of Dielectric Anisotr
- Page 7 and 8:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 9 and 10:
PP mPP vs.P =P,PP (1)P andPoster Se
- Page 11 and 12:
PP mPP vs.P =P,PP (1)P andPoster Se
- Page 13 and 14:
PP andPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 15 and 16:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 17 and 18:
PP and770 772 774 776 778 780 782 7
- Page 19 and 20:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 21 and 22:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 23 and 24:
P25,Poster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 25 and 26:
PP TOBBPoster Session, Thursday, Ju
- Page 27 and 28:
PisPPisisisP,PisPoster Session, Thu
- Page 29 and 30:
U NeslihanPPPPoster Session, Thursd
- Page 31 and 32:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 33 and 34:
PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 35 and 36:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 37 and 38:
P onP viaPP wereP upPoster Session,
- Page 39 and 40:
P ·cm.PVPPPsPPPPP andPoster Sessio
- Page 41 and 42:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 43 and 44:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 45 and 46:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 47 and 48:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 49 and 50:
PErkanPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 51 and 52:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 53 and 54:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 55 and 56:
PPPP andPoster Session, Thursday, J
- Page 57 and 58:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 59 and 60:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 61 and 62:
T PeptideTPP,PP,PP andTT2429TTTTTT
- Page 63 and 64:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 65 and 66:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 67 and 68:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 69 and 70:
PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 71 and 72:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 73 and 74:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 75 and 76: PT AdditionalT ThePoster Session, T
- Page 77 and 78: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 79 and 80: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 81 and 82: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 83 and 84: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 85 and 86: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 87 and 88: PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 89 and 90: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Hu
- Page 91 and 92: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 93 and 94: PPPPPPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 95 and 96: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 97 and 98: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 99 and 100: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 101 and 102: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 103 and 104: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 105 and 106: PPPPPPPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 107 and 108: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 109 and 110: PPPR2R PIN(80)PPgPP OzlemPPoster Se
- Page 111 and 112: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 113 and 114: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 115 and 116: P onPP toP coordinatedPPoster Sessi
- Page 117 and 118: PPPPP,PP,P(PR RmPoster Session, Thu
- Page 119 and 120: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 121 and 122: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 123 and 124: PP InstitutePP DepartmentPoster Ses
- Page 125: andPCPPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 129 and 130: PP toPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 131 and 132: PP andPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 133 and 134: PPPPoster Session, Thursday, June 1
- Page 135 and 136: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 137 and 138: PPP andP (.cm).Poster Session, Thur
- Page 139 and 140: PP tiltP andP editionPoster Session
- Page 141 and 142: PP andPPoster Session, Thursday, Ju
- Page 143 and 144: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 145 and 146: PP forP forP edit.PPoster Session,
- Page 147 and 148: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 149 and 150: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 151 and 152: PP ionicPP ,PPoster Session, Thursd
- Page 153 and 154: PP lightPoster Session, Thursday, J
- Page 155 and 156: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 157 and 158: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 159 and 160: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 161 and 162: PandPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 163 and 164: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17 T
- Page 165 and 166: PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 167 and 168: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 169 and 170: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 171 and 172: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 173 and 174: PP DepartmentNanoscienceTPPoster Se
- Page 175 and 176: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 177 and 178:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 179 and 180:
PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 181 and 182:
PPPPPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 183 and 184:
PPPPoster Session, Thursday, June 1
- Page 185 and 186:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 187 and 188:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 189 and 190:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 191 and 192:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 193 and 194:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 195 and 196:
0T0T0T0T AsPPPP werePoster Session,
- Page 197 and 198:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 199 and 200:
PPPPPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 201 and 202:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 203 and 204:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 205 and 206:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 207 and 208:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 209 and 210:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 211:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17AF