PPPPPP andPE.Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Theme F686 - N1123Preparation and SEM Characterization of Nanocomposites Based on HDPE and Graphite Powder12223445M. SarkanatP P, UI. H. TavmanUP P*, K. SeverP P, A. TurgutP P, Y. SekiP P, P ErbayP P, F.GünerP Pand I.Özdemir P2*1PMechanical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Dept., Ege University, 35100 Bornova Izmir, TurkeyPMechanical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Dept., Dokuz Eylul Univ., 35100 Bornova Izmir, Turkey3PTDepartment of Chemistry, Dokuz Eylül University, Buca, 35160 zmir, TurkeyPPetkim Petrokimya Hold<strong>in</strong>g A.., 35801 Aliaa-zmirPFaculty of Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Bart<strong>in</strong> University, Bart<strong>in</strong>, Turkey54Abstract-Polymers which are <strong>in</strong> general <strong>in</strong>sulat<strong>in</strong>g materials, may be made electrically and thermally conductive by the additionof conductive fillers such as graphite, carbon black, metal and metal oxide powders or fibers. In this study the conductive fillersused were nanosized graphite particles, the base material was high density polyethylene (HDPE). Nanocomposites conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g upto 30 weight % of filler material were prepared by mix<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong> a Brabender Plasticorder. SEM <strong>in</strong>vestigations of thecomposites prepared have been performed.Heat buildup <strong>in</strong> electronic components, light<strong>in</strong>g,transformer hous<strong>in</strong>gs, and other devices that produceunwanted heat can limit service life and reduce operat<strong>in</strong>gefficiency. Traditionally, metals which are good thermalconductor, has been used for thermal managementequipment such as heat s<strong>in</strong>ks and heat exchangers. Butmetal parts are heavy and costly to produce. In recentyears, they are be<strong>in</strong>g replaced by <strong>in</strong>jection molded orextruded heat-conduct<strong>in</strong>g plastic compounds that providelightweight cool<strong>in</strong>g solutions. Advantages <strong>in</strong>clude designflexibility, parts consolidation, corrosion and chemicalresistance, reduction of secondary f<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g operations,and the process<strong>in</strong>g benefits of plastics. Polymers which <strong>in</strong>general have low thermal conductivities (0.1-0.5 W/m.K)are made conductive by compound<strong>in</strong>g conductive fillerssuch as graphite fibers and ceramic particles. Somethermally conductive plastics may offer up to 500 times (to100 W/mK) the conductivity of base polymers. Thesematerials can be used to tailor the thermal conductivity to<strong>in</strong>dividual applications, provid<strong>in</strong>g the ability to dissipateheat precisely and efficiently.Various fillers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g metallic powders, are used toproduce thermally conductive polymers. Graphite powdersor fibers are frequently used especially for an improvementof electrical conductivity, antistatic properties as well asthermal conductivity of plastics, [1], [2]. The recentadvancement of nano-scale compound<strong>in</strong>g techniqueenables the preparation of highly electrically conductivepolymeric nanocomposites with low load<strong>in</strong>g of conductivefillers. Nanocomposites may offer enhanced physicalfeatures such as <strong>in</strong>creased stiffness, strength, barrierproperties and heat resistance, without loss of impactstrength <strong>in</strong> a very broad range of common synthetic ornatural polymers. In this study the conductive filler wasgraphite with an average particle size of 400 nm and purityof 99.9%, the matrix material was high density3polyethylene (HDPE) with a density of 0.968 g/ cmP amelt <strong>in</strong>dex of 5.8 g/10 m<strong>in</strong>, supplied by Petkim A..-zmir. Nanocomposites conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g up to 30 weight % ofgraphite powder filler material were prepared by mix<strong>in</strong>gthem <strong>in</strong> a Brabender Plasticorder at 180°C for 15 m<strong>in</strong>utes.The mix<strong>in</strong>g chamber of the Brabender apparatus was thenopened and the result<strong>in</strong>g mixture is taken out, then afterpass<strong>in</strong>g through the rollers the mixture was solidified. Theresultant mixture <strong>in</strong> then put <strong>in</strong> a compression mold<strong>in</strong>g dieand compressed <strong>in</strong> a compression mold<strong>in</strong>g press at 180°C,under 40 kP pressure for five m<strong>in</strong>utes to obta<strong>in</strong> samples <strong>in</strong>the form of sheets of 1mm <strong>in</strong> thickness.SEM micrographs of graphite–HDPE composites areshown <strong>in</strong> Figure 1. It can be seen that the graphite powderare dispersed uniformly <strong>in</strong> the matrix as seen <strong>in</strong> figure 1.abcFigure 1. SEM micrographs of Graphite re<strong>in</strong>forced HDPEcomposites a) %4 by weight Graphite re<strong>in</strong>forced HDPE, b) %10by weight Graphite re<strong>in</strong>forced HDPE, c) %20 by weight Graphitere<strong>in</strong>forced HDPEThis research was supported by the Scientific Support ofthe bilateral Project No. 107M227 of TUBITAK and SASand partly by the project VEGA No. 2/0063/09.* correspond<strong>in</strong>g author: HTismail.tavman@deu.edu.trT[1] Krupa,I., Chodák,I., 200, Physical Properties of thermoplastic/graphite composites, Eur. Polym. J., 37(11) 2159-2168.[2] Krupa,I., Novak,I., Chodák,I., 2004, HTElectrically andthermally conductive polyethylene/graphite composites and theirmechanical propertiesTH, Synthetic Metals, 145, 245-252.6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, 2010 739
PP andPoster Session, Thursday, June 17Theme F686 - N1123Optimization of Surface Modified Polymer/MWCNTs Nanofibers as Re<strong>in</strong>forcement <strong>in</strong>Nanocomposites111UElif ÖzdenUP P*, Yusuf MencelioluP Melih PapilaP1PFaculty of Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul 34956, TurkeyAbstract -The focus of this study is to fabricate composite nanofibers conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g MWCNTs and to <strong>in</strong>corporate them <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g re<strong>in</strong>forced andtoughened nanocomposites. A systematic understand<strong>in</strong>g of the electrosp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g process parameters for composite nanofibers was obta<strong>in</strong>ed andan emprical relationship between the parameters and the average fiber diameter was established by response surface methodology (RSM).Mechanical tests under flexural loads are reported to demonstrate the effect of the composite nanofiber re<strong>in</strong>forcement.Nano- to submicron-scale fibers are also recently exploredfor their re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>in</strong> composites. Carbon nanotubes(CNTs) have been widely considered as a filler material dueto their unique electrical and mechanical properties such aselectrical conductivity, high specific strength and stiffness[1]. There are numerous attempts to fabricate CNTsembedded electrospun polymeric nanofiber webs, to enhancemechanical properties of the nanofibrous structure [2,3].However, these composite nanofibers have not beenembedded <strong>in</strong>to polymer matrices to produce nanocomposites.As reported <strong>in</strong> our previous work [4], surface reactive P(Stco-GMA)nanofibers are promis<strong>in</strong>g materials <strong>in</strong> re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>gand toughen<strong>in</strong>g of the epoxy res<strong>in</strong>. For its extension,multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) re<strong>in</strong>forcedpolymer composite fiber webs have been fabricated us<strong>in</strong>g theelectrosp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g technique.The solutions of P(St-co-GMA)/DMF at various MWCNTsconcentrations (1% wt, 1,5% and 2 % wt) were prepared andstirred magnetically for 24 hour to obta<strong>in</strong> homogeneity. S<strong>in</strong>cePSt has aromatic r<strong>in</strong>g, long term stabilization of MWCNTs <strong>in</strong>electrosp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g polymer solution has been successfullyachieved dur<strong>in</strong>g nanofiber formation, which was alsoprovided by the Dynamic Light Scatter<strong>in</strong>g (DLS) analysis.An electrical bias potential (via Gamma High Voltage ES30P-20W) was applied to the polymer solutions conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>2-ml syr<strong>in</strong>ge, which has an alligator clip attached to thesyr<strong>in</strong>ge needle (diameter 300 m). The applied voltage wasadjusted to 15kV, while the grounded collector was placed at10 cm away from the syr<strong>in</strong>ge needle. A syr<strong>in</strong>ge pump(NewEra NE-1000 Syr<strong>in</strong>ge Pump) was used to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> asolution flow rate of 30 l/hr dur<strong>in</strong>g electrosp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g.The three level factorial design of experiments wasimplemented to <strong>in</strong>vestigate and identify the significance oftwo process parameters (one is the polymer concentration andthe other is the MWCNTs concentration) on the average fiberdiameter, as seen <strong>in</strong> Figure 1. The morphologies and the fiberdiameters of PSt-co-GMA/MWCNTs fibrous webs wereevaluated by scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscope (SEM - LEO1530VP). A quantitative relationship between the polymerand the MWCNTs concentration parameters and the averagefiber diameter was sought by response surface methodology(RSM). SEM images demonstrated that P(St-co-GMA)/MWCNTs composite nanofibers were considerablyth<strong>in</strong>ner (200 - 550 nm) than P(St-co-GMA) nanofibers (400 –800 nm). This is attributed to the shear th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g effectassociated with the MWCNTs. Due to the shear th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gbehavior, shear viscosity decreased and resulted <strong>in</strong> reducedfiber diameter along with the <strong>in</strong>crease on conductivity.Consider<strong>in</strong>g homogeneity of webs, uniformity and lowvariance <strong>in</strong> nanofiber diameter, electrosp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g solution at30% polymer concentration and 1% MWCNTs concentrationwas preferred.In order to assess the mechanical performance due to theP(St-co-GMA)/MWCNTs composite fibers, they were firstcut <strong>in</strong>to 12 mm x 50 mm pieces. Next, the fiber mats wereembedded <strong>in</strong>to the epoxy res<strong>in</strong> per our procedure [4].Thermal-mechanical properties of the neat epoxy and thecomposite nanofiber re<strong>in</strong>forced nanocomposites were<strong>in</strong>vestigated by us<strong>in</strong>g a dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer(Netzsch DMA 242). The storage moduli of the 30 wt% PStco-GMA/MWCNTs(1 wt%) composite nanofiber, atre<strong>in</strong>forced nanocomposites are about 20 times higher than theneat epoxy, at weight fraction of the nanofibers be<strong>in</strong>g as lowas 2% at 80 C. Mechanical response of nanowebs, at variousMWCNTs and polymer concentration, embedded <strong>in</strong>to epoxyis also underway.Figure 1. The morphology of fibers at applied voltage 15 kV atpolymer concentrations from 25% to 30% wt and MWCNTsconcentrations from 1% to 2% wt with a constant tip-to-collectordistance of 15 cm.*Corrrespond<strong>in</strong>g author: HTelifozden@su.sabanciuniv.eduT[1] Treacy, M. M. J.; Ebbesen, T. W.; Gibson, J. M. 1996Exceptionally High Young’s Modulus Observed for IndividualCarbon Nanotubes. Nature, 381, 678–680.[2] Seoul C.; Kim Y.T.; Baek C.K;, 2003, Electrosp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g ofPoly(v<strong>in</strong>ylidene fluoride)/Dimethylformamide Solutions withCarbon Nanotubes, Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: PolymerPhysics, Vol. 41, 1572–1577.[3] Sen R.;, Zhao B.; Perea D.; Haddon R. C.; 2004 Preparation ofS<strong>in</strong>gle-Walled Carbon Nanotube Re<strong>in</strong>forced Polystyrene andPolyurethane Nanofibers and Membranes by Electrosp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, NanoLetters, 4 (3), 459-464.[4] Ozden E.; Menceloglu Y.; Papila M. "ElectrospunPolymer/MWCNTs Nanofiber Re<strong>in</strong>forced Composites“Improvement of Interfacial Bond<strong>in</strong>g by Surface ModifiedNanofibers”" , 2009 MRS Fall Meet<strong>in</strong>g Symposium FF proceed<strong>in</strong>gs.6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, 2010 740
- Page 1:
Poster Presentations3rd Day17 June
- Page 4 and 5:
Determination of Dielectric Anisotr
- Page 7 and 8:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 9 and 10:
PP mPP vs.P =P,PP (1)P andPoster Se
- Page 11 and 12:
PP mPP vs.P =P,PP (1)P andPoster Se
- Page 13 and 14:
PP andPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 15 and 16:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 17 and 18:
PP and770 772 774 776 778 780 782 7
- Page 19 and 20:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 21 and 22:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 23 and 24:
P25,Poster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 25 and 26:
PP TOBBPoster Session, Thursday, Ju
- Page 27 and 28:
PisPPisisisP,PisPoster Session, Thu
- Page 29 and 30:
U NeslihanPPPPoster Session, Thursd
- Page 31 and 32:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 33 and 34:
PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 35 and 36:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 37 and 38:
P onP viaPP wereP upPoster Session,
- Page 39 and 40:
P ·cm.PVPPPsPPPPP andPoster Sessio
- Page 41 and 42:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 43 and 44:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 45 and 46:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 47 and 48:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 49 and 50:
PErkanPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 51 and 52:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 53 and 54:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 55 and 56:
PPPP andPoster Session, Thursday, J
- Page 57 and 58:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 59 and 60:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 61 and 62:
T PeptideTPP,PP,PP andTT2429TTTTTT
- Page 63 and 64:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 65 and 66:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 67 and 68:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 69 and 70:
PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 71 and 72:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 73 and 74:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 75 and 76:
PT AdditionalT ThePoster Session, T
- Page 77 and 78:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 79 and 80: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 81 and 82: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 83 and 84: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 85 and 86: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 87 and 88: PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 89 and 90: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Hu
- Page 91 and 92: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 93 and 94: PPPPPPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 95 and 96: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 97 and 98: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 99 and 100: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 101 and 102: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 103 and 104: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 105 and 106: PPPPPPPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 107 and 108: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 109 and 110: PPPR2R PIN(80)PPgPP OzlemPPoster Se
- Page 111 and 112: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 113 and 114: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 115 and 116: P onPP toP coordinatedPPoster Sessi
- Page 117 and 118: PPPPP,PP,P(PR RmPoster Session, Thu
- Page 119 and 120: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 121 and 122: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 123 and 124: PP InstitutePP DepartmentPoster Ses
- Page 125 and 126: andPCPPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 127 and 128: PP scatteringPYusufPP Corresponding
- Page 129: PP toPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 133 and 134: PPPPoster Session, Thursday, June 1
- Page 135 and 136: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 137 and 138: PPP andP (.cm).Poster Session, Thur
- Page 139 and 140: PP tiltP andP editionPoster Session
- Page 141 and 142: PP andPPoster Session, Thursday, Ju
- Page 143 and 144: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 145 and 146: PP forP forP edit.PPoster Session,
- Page 147 and 148: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 149 and 150: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 151 and 152: PP ionicPP ,PPoster Session, Thursd
- Page 153 and 154: PP lightPoster Session, Thursday, J
- Page 155 and 156: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 157 and 158: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 159 and 160: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 161 and 162: PandPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 163 and 164: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17 T
- Page 165 and 166: PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 167 and 168: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 169 and 170: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 171 and 172: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 173 and 174: PP DepartmentNanoscienceTPPoster Se
- Page 175 and 176: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 177 and 178: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 179 and 180: PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 181 and 182:
PPPPPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 183 and 184:
PPPPoster Session, Thursday, June 1
- Page 185 and 186:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 187 and 188:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 189 and 190:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 191 and 192:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 193 and 194:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 195 and 196:
0T0T0T0T AsPPPP werePoster Session,
- Page 197 and 198:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 199 and 200:
PPPPPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 201 and 202:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 203 and 204:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 205 and 206:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 207 and 208:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 209 and 210:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 211:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17AF