10.07.2015 Views

Photonic crystals in biology - NanoTR-VI

Photonic crystals in biology - NanoTR-VI

Photonic crystals in biology - NanoTR-VI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17Theme F686 - N1123Assembly of Peptide Coated Gold Nanoparticles on Surfaces1111Ismail Say<strong>in</strong>P P, Kemal KeserogluP P, Mehmet KahramanP Pand UMustafa CulhaUP P*1PDepartment of Genetics and Bioeng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Yeditepe University, Istanbul 34755, TurkeyAbstract-The assembly of nanoparticles <strong>in</strong>to the desired organizations and patterns is critically important for construction of higher structuresus<strong>in</strong>g nanoparticles as build<strong>in</strong>g block. In this regard, we designed charged peptides that can stably b<strong>in</strong>d the gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) to alterthe surface charge properties. Then, we <strong>in</strong>vestigate how the surface charge of the nanoparticles can <strong>in</strong>fluence the assembly of the AuNPs onsurfaces with different polarity from a dry<strong>in</strong>g droplet of their colloidal suspension.Self assembly of the biomolecule modified nanoparticles isextensively studied <strong>in</strong> recent years [1,2]. The ma<strong>in</strong> reasonbeh<strong>in</strong>d the use of biomolecule-modified nanoparticles is toutilize the exist<strong>in</strong>g weak <strong>in</strong>teractions among biomolecules andbio-macromolecules such as hydrogen bonds, van der Waals,dipol-dipol and ionic <strong>in</strong>teractions to control the nanoparticleassembly. The peptides are one of the target molecules thatare used <strong>in</strong> these studies because of their easy design andmanipulation of their charge and polarity properties com<strong>in</strong>gfrom their side cha<strong>in</strong>s. One of the major factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>gthe stabilization of the AuNPs <strong>in</strong> the aqueous environment isthe zeta potential (). Nearly -/+ 30 mV is needed for thestability of the nanoparticles and below these potentials thenanoparticles start to aggregate [3]. The charged peptides canbe used to stabilize the gold nanoparticles [4].In this work, we <strong>in</strong>vestigated the assembly of chargedpeptide modified AuNPs and their assembly after addition ofthe oppositely charged peptides <strong>in</strong>to the modified goldcolloidal suspension. The rational beh<strong>in</strong>d this reason was tolook for any relationship between the surface chargeproperties of the nanoparticles and its affect on the assemblyof the nanoparticles <strong>in</strong> a dry<strong>in</strong>g droplet. The additions of theoppositely charged peptides cause surface potential changewhich is thought to <strong>in</strong>fluence the formation of uniquestructures. The peptides used <strong>in</strong> this regard are given <strong>in</strong>Table 1.Table 1. Peptides that were used <strong>in</strong> the experiments.Purpose Code peptide sequencesOverallChargeP1 Cys-Ser-Glu (-)Modificationof AuNPs P16 Cys-Ser-Glu-Asp-Ser-Asp-Glu-Ser Asp-Ser-Glu-Ser-Asp-Ser-Glu(-)Aggregation P3 Lys-Lys (+)Initiation P11 Lys-Arg-Arg-Lys (+)In this study, we first <strong>in</strong>vestigated the self assembledstructures occurred <strong>in</strong> suspension us<strong>in</strong>g SAXS and at the solidliquid <strong>in</strong>terface with SEM and AFM. A correlation withsurface charge properties of the modified AuNPs andassembly behavior <strong>in</strong> suspension and at liquid-solid <strong>in</strong>terfacewas <strong>in</strong>vestigated. The <strong>in</strong>fluence of the hydrophobic andhydrophilic surfaces on the behavior of the AuNPs was also<strong>in</strong>vestigated. It was observed that, on the hydrophilic surfaces,the modified AuNPs formed larger aggregates with thedecreas<strong>in</strong>g value of the surface potential and the structures canbe seen all over the surface of the droplet area (Figure 1 andTable 2). On the hydrophobic surfaces, aga<strong>in</strong> the aggregatesizes were <strong>in</strong>versely proportional to the surface potential. Theaggregates were not spread all over the droplet area but theyformed at the near center area of the droplet.A)Figure 1. Aggregates/assemblies of modified AuNPs with differentzeta potentials on hydrophilic surfaces from a dry<strong>in</strong>g droplet.A)AuP1 + 1 L P11 B) AuP1 + 5 L P11Table 2. Zeta potential change after addition of the oppositelycharged peptides.AuNP-P11 L P11(+)5 L P11(+)In summary, the prelim<strong>in</strong>ary data shows that the structuresformed <strong>in</strong> the dry<strong>in</strong>g droplet are related to the zeta potentialson the AuNPs resid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> colloidal suspension. The assemblyof the peptide modified gold nanoparticles differs with respectto the surface bound peptides and addition of the oppositelycharged peptides. The assembly of the nanopartices is alsoaffected from the polarity of the surface. The long term goal ofthis study is to f<strong>in</strong>d a way to nanoparticles by modify<strong>in</strong>g thesurface charge properties of nanoparticles and the studies areconducted <strong>in</strong> this direction. This work was supported byTUBITAK under Grant No. 108T605.*Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author: HTmculha@yeditepe.edu.trT10 L P11(+)AuNP-P1 (-) -30 mV -20 mV -10 mV -7 mV[1] Varpness, Z.; Peters, J. W.; Young, M.; Douglas, T. Nano Lett.2005, 5, 2306-2309.[2] Kramer, R. M.; Sowards, L. A.; Pender, M. A.; Stone, M. O.;Naik, R. R. Langmuir 2005, 21, 8466-8470.[3] J.A. Tullman, W.F. F<strong>in</strong>ney, Y.-J. L<strong>in</strong>, S.W. Bishnoi, Plasmonics 2(2007) 119.[4] R. L vy, ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 1141B)2 μm 2 μm6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, 2010 645

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!