Photonic crystals in biology - NanoTR-VI
Photonic crystals in biology - NanoTR-VI
Photonic crystals in biology - NanoTR-VI
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Theme F686 - N1123Effect of Both Silane-Grafted and Ion-Exchanged Organophilic Clay <strong>in</strong> Structural, Thermal andMechanical Properties of Unsaturated Polyester NanocompositesS<strong>in</strong>an enDepartment of Polymer Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Yalova University, 77100 Yalova, Turkey /Advanced Technologies Research and Development Center, Bogazici University, 34342 stanbul, Turkey.Abstract— Unsaturated polyester (UPE) res<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g styrene monomer was mixed with montmorillonite (MMT) claywhich was modified with cetyl trimethly ammonium bromide and trimethoxy v<strong>in</strong>yl silane. The exfoliated nanocompositestructure hav<strong>in</strong>g better thermal and dynamic mechanical properties was obta<strong>in</strong>ed when the MMT clay was modified <strong>in</strong> thepresence of both modifiers.Polymer-clay nanocomposites have attracted an<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g attention due to impressive enhancements ofmaterial properties due to nanometer size of filler dispersioncompared to pure or conventionally filled polymers. There aretwo types of polymer-clay nanocomposite structures, namely<strong>in</strong>tercalates, where polymer cha<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>tercalate between thelayers and exfoliates, where silicate layers are completelydelam<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> the polymer matrix [1]. S<strong>in</strong>ce improvements <strong>in</strong>many properties depend on the degree of dispersion of thenanoparticles, exfoliated nanocomposites are generally thetarget of many nanocomposite studies. In situ polymerizationwas the first method used to synthesize polymer-claynanocomposites. The thermoset-clay nanocomposites<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g phenol res<strong>in</strong>s [2], epoxy res<strong>in</strong>s [3] and unsaturatedpolyester res<strong>in</strong>s [4] as polymer matrices were obta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>situ<strong>in</strong>tercalative polymerization method <strong>in</strong> which polymerres<strong>in</strong>, dissolved <strong>in</strong> a polymerizable monomer such as styrene,is <strong>in</strong>tercalated between clay layers and then followed bycrossl<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g reaction.In this study, UPE - MMT clay nanocomposites havebeen synthesized by <strong>in</strong> situ method. The MMT clay wasorganically modified with cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromideand also with trimethoxy v<strong>in</strong>yl silane. These modificationagents were used both <strong>in</strong>dividually and together. The cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide is expected to <strong>in</strong>tercalatebetween the clay layers through ion-exchange reaction whilethe silane agent grafts onto edge and surface hydroxyl groups<strong>in</strong> montmorillonite clay. Thereby, for “double” modifiedMMT clay, reactive double bond <strong>in</strong> v<strong>in</strong>yl silane coupl<strong>in</strong>gagent can participate <strong>in</strong> the polymerization reaction from bothsurface and edges of ammonium ion-<strong>in</strong>tercalated clay layers,which may lead to a completely exfoliated nanocompositesstructure. Differences <strong>in</strong> dynamic mechanical and thermalproperties as well as the morphology of the resultantnanocomposites were all discussed by pay<strong>in</strong>g attention to theMMT modification mechanisms.XRD analysis gave the values of the <strong>in</strong>terlayer spac<strong>in</strong>g ord-spac<strong>in</strong>g of the NaMMT and the modified clays which wereobta<strong>in</strong>ed from the peak position of the d 001 reflection <strong>in</strong> thediffraction patterns The XRD result show<strong>in</strong>g a decrease ofdiffract<strong>in</strong>g angle which <strong>in</strong> turn <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terlayer distanceproved succesful <strong>in</strong>tercalation of MMT clay layers with cetylammonium salt through the ion-exchange reaction. In the caseof the ‘double-modifed’ clay-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g nanocomposite,UPECetViSiM-C, an exfoliated structure was obta<strong>in</strong>ed withthe absence of any d 001 reflection <strong>in</strong> the XRD region. Thisresult may be attributed to the good swell<strong>in</strong>g of CetViSiMMT<strong>in</strong> UPE res<strong>in</strong> and homogeneous and f<strong>in</strong>e dispersion of it <strong>in</strong> thematrix, as well as promotion of polymerization both betweensilica layers, and from surfaces and edges of the clay with thehelp of reactive double bond present <strong>in</strong> the ViSi modifier. Themorphology of the exfoliated nanocomposite was also<strong>in</strong>vestigated by AFM analysis show<strong>in</strong>g that very th<strong>in</strong>dispersion of CetViSiMMT clay platelets were oriented <strong>in</strong> allpossible directions to one another <strong>in</strong> the matrix as aconfirmation of XRD peak disappearance. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, theexfoliated UPECetViSiM-C nanocomposite was found to havethe highest thermal stability and better dynamic mechanicalproperties (Table 1), even with a clay content as low as 3 wt%.Table 1. DMA data for neat UPE and UPE nanocompositesMaterials E’ at 60°C(MPa)E’ at 80°C(MPa)Neat UPE 1458 204UPECetM-C 1625 247UPEViSiM-C 1743 259UPECetViSiM-C 1840 390Fracture surfaces of UPE and its nanocomposites were<strong>in</strong>vestigated by scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopy (SEM) us<strong>in</strong>gbackscattered imag<strong>in</strong>g (Fig. 1). SEM images of the fracturesurfaces showed that presence of CetViSiMMT clay with ahomogeneous and nano-sized dispersion <strong>in</strong> the polymermatrix, led to crack propagation along a more ‘rougher’ path.On the other hand, the UPECetM-C exhibited a heterogenousfracture surface, which may be probably due to its <strong>in</strong>tercalatedstructure.Figure 1: SEM micrographs of the fracture surfaces of (a) neatUPE; (b) UPECetM-C; (c) UPECetViSiM-C and (d) UPEViSiM-C.*Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author: s<strong>in</strong>ans@yalova.edu.tr[1]. S.S. Ray, and M. Okamoto, Prog. Polym. Sci., 28, 1539 (2003).[2]. T. Lan, P.D. Kaviratna, and T.J. P<strong>in</strong>navaia, Chem. Mater., 7, 2144 (1995).[3]. D.C. Lee, and L.W. Jang, J. App. Polym. Sci., 68, 1997 (1998).[4]. D.J. Suh, Y.T Lim, and O.O. Park, Polymer, 41, 8557 (2000).6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, 2010 752