10.07.2015 Views

Photonic crystals in biology - NanoTR-VI

Photonic crystals in biology - NanoTR-VI

Photonic crystals in biology - NanoTR-VI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Theme F686 - N1123Effect of Both Silane-Grafted and Ion-Exchanged Organophilic Clay <strong>in</strong> Structural, Thermal andMechanical Properties of Unsaturated Polyester NanocompositesS<strong>in</strong>an enDepartment of Polymer Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Yalova University, 77100 Yalova, Turkey /Advanced Technologies Research and Development Center, Bogazici University, 34342 stanbul, Turkey.Abstract— Unsaturated polyester (UPE) res<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g styrene monomer was mixed with montmorillonite (MMT) claywhich was modified with cetyl trimethly ammonium bromide and trimethoxy v<strong>in</strong>yl silane. The exfoliated nanocompositestructure hav<strong>in</strong>g better thermal and dynamic mechanical properties was obta<strong>in</strong>ed when the MMT clay was modified <strong>in</strong> thepresence of both modifiers.Polymer-clay nanocomposites have attracted an<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g attention due to impressive enhancements ofmaterial properties due to nanometer size of filler dispersioncompared to pure or conventionally filled polymers. There aretwo types of polymer-clay nanocomposite structures, namely<strong>in</strong>tercalates, where polymer cha<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>tercalate between thelayers and exfoliates, where silicate layers are completelydelam<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> the polymer matrix [1]. S<strong>in</strong>ce improvements <strong>in</strong>many properties depend on the degree of dispersion of thenanoparticles, exfoliated nanocomposites are generally thetarget of many nanocomposite studies. In situ polymerizationwas the first method used to synthesize polymer-claynanocomposites. The thermoset-clay nanocomposites<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g phenol res<strong>in</strong>s [2], epoxy res<strong>in</strong>s [3] and unsaturatedpolyester res<strong>in</strong>s [4] as polymer matrices were obta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>situ<strong>in</strong>tercalative polymerization method <strong>in</strong> which polymerres<strong>in</strong>, dissolved <strong>in</strong> a polymerizable monomer such as styrene,is <strong>in</strong>tercalated between clay layers and then followed bycrossl<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g reaction.In this study, UPE - MMT clay nanocomposites havebeen synthesized by <strong>in</strong> situ method. The MMT clay wasorganically modified with cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromideand also with trimethoxy v<strong>in</strong>yl silane. These modificationagents were used both <strong>in</strong>dividually and together. The cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide is expected to <strong>in</strong>tercalatebetween the clay layers through ion-exchange reaction whilethe silane agent grafts onto edge and surface hydroxyl groups<strong>in</strong> montmorillonite clay. Thereby, for “double” modifiedMMT clay, reactive double bond <strong>in</strong> v<strong>in</strong>yl silane coupl<strong>in</strong>gagent can participate <strong>in</strong> the polymerization reaction from bothsurface and edges of ammonium ion-<strong>in</strong>tercalated clay layers,which may lead to a completely exfoliated nanocompositesstructure. Differences <strong>in</strong> dynamic mechanical and thermalproperties as well as the morphology of the resultantnanocomposites were all discussed by pay<strong>in</strong>g attention to theMMT modification mechanisms.XRD analysis gave the values of the <strong>in</strong>terlayer spac<strong>in</strong>g ord-spac<strong>in</strong>g of the NaMMT and the modified clays which wereobta<strong>in</strong>ed from the peak position of the d 001 reflection <strong>in</strong> thediffraction patterns The XRD result show<strong>in</strong>g a decrease ofdiffract<strong>in</strong>g angle which <strong>in</strong> turn <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terlayer distanceproved succesful <strong>in</strong>tercalation of MMT clay layers with cetylammonium salt through the ion-exchange reaction. In the caseof the ‘double-modifed’ clay-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g nanocomposite,UPECetViSiM-C, an exfoliated structure was obta<strong>in</strong>ed withthe absence of any d 001 reflection <strong>in</strong> the XRD region. Thisresult may be attributed to the good swell<strong>in</strong>g of CetViSiMMT<strong>in</strong> UPE res<strong>in</strong> and homogeneous and f<strong>in</strong>e dispersion of it <strong>in</strong> thematrix, as well as promotion of polymerization both betweensilica layers, and from surfaces and edges of the clay with thehelp of reactive double bond present <strong>in</strong> the ViSi modifier. Themorphology of the exfoliated nanocomposite was also<strong>in</strong>vestigated by AFM analysis show<strong>in</strong>g that very th<strong>in</strong>dispersion of CetViSiMMT clay platelets were oriented <strong>in</strong> allpossible directions to one another <strong>in</strong> the matrix as aconfirmation of XRD peak disappearance. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, theexfoliated UPECetViSiM-C nanocomposite was found to havethe highest thermal stability and better dynamic mechanicalproperties (Table 1), even with a clay content as low as 3 wt%.Table 1. DMA data for neat UPE and UPE nanocompositesMaterials E’ at 60°C(MPa)E’ at 80°C(MPa)Neat UPE 1458 204UPECetM-C 1625 247UPEViSiM-C 1743 259UPECetViSiM-C 1840 390Fracture surfaces of UPE and its nanocomposites were<strong>in</strong>vestigated by scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscopy (SEM) us<strong>in</strong>gbackscattered imag<strong>in</strong>g (Fig. 1). SEM images of the fracturesurfaces showed that presence of CetViSiMMT clay with ahomogeneous and nano-sized dispersion <strong>in</strong> the polymermatrix, led to crack propagation along a more ‘rougher’ path.On the other hand, the UPECetM-C exhibited a heterogenousfracture surface, which may be probably due to its <strong>in</strong>tercalatedstructure.Figure 1: SEM micrographs of the fracture surfaces of (a) neatUPE; (b) UPECetM-C; (c) UPECetViSiM-C and (d) UPEViSiM-C.*Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author: s<strong>in</strong>ans@yalova.edu.tr[1]. S.S. Ray, and M. Okamoto, Prog. Polym. Sci., 28, 1539 (2003).[2]. T. Lan, P.D. Kaviratna, and T.J. P<strong>in</strong>navaia, Chem. Mater., 7, 2144 (1995).[3]. D.C. Lee, and L.W. Jang, J. App. Polym. Sci., 68, 1997 (1998).[4]. D.J. Suh, Y.T Lim, and O.O. Park, Polymer, 41, 8557 (2000).6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, 2010 752

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!