TTTandTTsizeTTdeconvolutionThybridPPTGaussianTfollowsTTandTPoster Session, Thursday, June 17Theme F686 - N1123Calculat<strong>in</strong>g the Homogeneous Spectrum of PbSe Quantum Dot based on Fourier-Wavelet Deconvolution112UA.A. AskariUP P*, L. RahimiP Pand A.R. BahrampourPPDepartment of Physics, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, IranPDepartment of Physics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran21Abstract— Homogeneous absorption and emission spectra of PbSe quantum dots (QDs) with an average diameter of 6.8 nm is obta<strong>in</strong>ed byemploy<strong>in</strong>g a deconvolution procedure. Deconvolution is a noise sensitive process. To avoid numerical <strong>in</strong>stabilities and noise amplificationdur<strong>in</strong>g deconvolution, an efficient, hybrid Fourier-wavelet algorithm is proposed. This technique predicts a large homogeneous l<strong>in</strong>e-width,which is <strong>in</strong> good agreement with the recently measured data.SemiconductorT Tnano-TT<strong>crystals</strong>T ThaveT TrecentlyT TattractedTTconsiderableT TattentionT TdueT TtoT TtheTT varietyT TofTTapplications,T T<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gT Tlasers,T TphotovoltaicT TsolarT Tcells,lightT Temitt<strong>in</strong>gT Tdiodes,T TfieldT TeffectT Ttransistors,T TetcT T[1-3].TTSemiconductor QDs,T TsuchT TasT TPbST TandT TPbSeT Thave aAbsorbance (a.u.)0.6 (a)0.40.21 1.5 2 2.5 30.4(b)0.30.20.100.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6relativelyT TlargeT effective TexcitonT TBohrT TradiusT T[4].T TThusTTtheT TregimeT TofT TstrongT Tquantum-conf<strong>in</strong>ementT TofT TbothT TtheT0.6 (c)0.2 (d)TelectronT TandT TholeT TcanT TbeT TmoreT TeasilyT TaccessedT T<strong>in</strong>T TtheseTTmaterials.T TFurthermore,T TtheT TleadT TchalcogenideT TQDsT TcanTThaveT TabsorptionT TandT TemissionT TspectraT T<strong>in</strong>T TtheT T1-2T TμmTTrange,T TwhichT TmakesT TthemT TappropriateT TcandidatesT TforTAbsorbance (a.u.)0.50.40.30.20.101 1.5 2 2.5 3Energy (eV)0.150.10.0500.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2Energy (eV)TtelecommunicationsT TapplicationsT T[5].T TTheT Tl<strong>in</strong>e-widthT TofTTtheT TemissionT TandT TabsorptionT TspectrumT TdependsT TonT TbothTTtheT ThomogeneousT TandT T<strong>in</strong>homogeneousT Tbroaden<strong>in</strong>gTTmechanisms.T TExclud<strong>in</strong>gT T<strong>in</strong>homogeneousT Tbroaden<strong>in</strong>gTTassociatedT TwithT TaT TdistributionT TofT TQDs,T TtheT T<strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sicTThomogeneousT Tl<strong>in</strong>e-width,T T,T TofT TanT TopticalT TtransitionT Tis TT<strong>in</strong>verselyT TproportionalT TtoT Tdephas<strong>in</strong>gT TtimeT TTR2 R( /T 2)TTDifferentT TmechanismT TsuchT TasT TphononT T<strong>in</strong>teraction,TTlifetimeT Tbroaden<strong>in</strong>gT TandT Tcarrier-carrierT T<strong>in</strong>teractionT TcanTTare responsible forT the ThomogeneousT Tbroaden<strong>in</strong>g ofsemiconductor QDsT T[6].From the theory of optical l<strong>in</strong>e shapes, thehhomogeneous, , and <strong>in</strong>homogeneous, , absorption ora , ea, eemission spectra can be related via the follow<strong>in</strong>g equation, h a ea,e)0( v) P(R) ( v,R dR . (1)Here, P(R) is the probability distribution function of QDs withmean radius R. Equation 1 can be rewritten asha, e( v) g(v)a,e( v)(2)Where g()=P(R()) dR/d and * is the convolution operator.TThe convolutionT ToperatorT TsimplifiesT TtoT TscalarT TproductT T<strong>in</strong> TTFourier'sT Tdoma<strong>in</strong>,T TandT ThenceT TtheT ThomogeneousT TspectrumT TcanTTbeT Tobta<strong>in</strong>edT TviaT TaT TprocedureT TasTTh1 Ga,e( v) F ( ) . (3)THere,T TGTa,eTRa,eRT TareT TtheT TFourierT TtransformsT TofT TgTTRa,eRTTrespectively.T TWhenT TtheT T<strong>in</strong>verseT TsystemT TisT Till-conditionedT TorTTnon-<strong>in</strong>vertible,T TdeconvolutionT TleadsT TtoT TnonsenseT Tresults.T TToTTavoidT TnumericalT T<strong>in</strong>stabilitiesT Tdur<strong>in</strong>gT the TdeconvolutionTTprocedure,T TweT TemployedT TaT TFourier-waveletT T<strong>in</strong>verseTTfilterT TforT TdeconvolutionT TandT Tdenois<strong>in</strong>gT TsimultaneouslyT T[7].TFiguresT T(1-a)T TandT (T1-b)T TshowT TtheT T<strong>in</strong>homogeneousTFigure 1. (a and b) Inhomogeneous spectra of PbSe QDs TwithTTanT TaverageT TdiameterT TofT T6.8±0.3T Tnm, T(c) Homogeneous spectraobta<strong>in</strong>ed via the deconvolution procedure. (d) Homogeneous(solid curves) and <strong>in</strong>homogeneous spectra (dashed curves).Symlet 7 filter [7] TisT TusedT TandT TnumericalT TresultsT TareT TshownTT<strong>in</strong>T TfigureT T(1-c).T TFigureT T(1-d)T TillustratesT TtheT TnormalizedTThomogeneousT T(dashedT Tcurve)T TandT T<strong>in</strong>homogeneousT T(solidTTcurve)T TspectraT Tcorrespond<strong>in</strong>gT TtoT T1sReR1sRhRT and some othertransitions Tsimultaneously.T TAtT TroomT Ttemperature,T TweT found TaTTlargeT ThomogeneousT TcomponentT T(FWHM25T TmeV TT), TT<strong>in</strong>TTcomparison toT TensembleT Tbroaden<strong>in</strong>g.T TThisT TsituationTT<strong>in</strong>tensifiesT T<strong>in</strong>T TupperT Ttransitions.T TTheT TlargeT ThomogeneousT Tl<strong>in</strong>ewidthTTofT TPbST TandT TPbSeT TQDsT ThasT TbeenT TreportedT TbyT TPetersonTT[9] and Kamisaka [10].In summary, this paper proposed the deconvolutionalgorithm <strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong> the homogeneousabsorption/emission spectrum from the <strong>in</strong>homogeneous one.Deconvolution is an unstable process. To prevent numerical<strong>in</strong>stabilities dur<strong>in</strong>g deconvolution, an optimal <strong>in</strong>verse filterbased on Fourier-wavelet algorithm is employed. Thesimulation results are <strong>in</strong> good agreement with theexperimental data.*Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author: Askari.s.ali@Gmail.com[1] L.J. Zhao et al., Nano Lett. 6, 463 (2006).[2] V.I. Klimov et al., Science, 290, 314 (2000).[3] D.V. Talap<strong>in</strong> and C.B. Murray, Sciense, 310, 86 (2005).[4] A.L. Efros and A.L. Efros, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 16, 772 (1982).[5] A.R. Bahrampour et al., Opt. Commun. 282, 4449 (2009).[6] J.L. Sk<strong>in</strong>ner, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 39, 463 (1988).[7] A.R. Bahrampour, A.A. Askari, Opt. Commun. 257, 97 (2006).[8] R. Koole et al., Small, 4, No.1, 127 (2008) .[9] J.J. Peterson and T.D. Krauss, Nano Lett. 6, 510 (2006).[10] H. Kamisaka et al., Nano Lett. 6, No. 10, 2295 (2006).TabsorbanceT TspectrumT TofT TanT TensembleT TofT TQDsT TofT TPbSeT TwithTTanT TaverageT TdiameterT TofT T6.8±0.3T TnmT T[8].T TAsT TtheseTT figuresTTshow,T TeachT TtransitionT TisT TmodeledT TwithT TaTTfunction.TTToT Tobta<strong>in</strong>T ThomogeneousT Tspectrum,T TfromT T<strong>in</strong>homogeneousTTversion,T TtheTT deconvolutionT TalgorithmT based on Tikhonov-6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, 2010 628
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Theme F686 - N1123Modal Analysis of Circularly Bent Coupled Optical WaveguidesN. Özlem Ünverdi 1* and N. Aydın Ünverdi 21 Department of Electrical-Electronics Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Yldz Technical University, stanbul 34349, Turkey2 Department of Mechanical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, stanbul Technical University, stanbul 34437, TurkeyAbstract— In this study, a pair of circularly bent, bare, weakly guid<strong>in</strong>g, lossless, multimode and slab optical fibers located <strong>in</strong>the same plane was analyzed. The impact of coupl<strong>in</strong>g on the modal propagation constant was <strong>in</strong>vestigated, and the coupl<strong>in</strong>gbetween even TE leaky modes was found to be stronger than the coupl<strong>in</strong>g between all other leaky modes.Radiation is tangent to the radiation caustic <strong>in</strong> circularly bentoptical waveguides. In this study, the <strong>in</strong>teractions ofevanescent fields of optical waveguides are solved byconsider<strong>in</strong>g the problems of determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the behaviour of<strong>in</strong>cident radiation on a convex surface and modal analysis [1,2].In optics, a beam is an idealized concept of <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itesimallyth<strong>in</strong> light cluster. Light beams are modeled as l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> physicsand optical problems are solved based on geometricalpr<strong>in</strong>ciples. In this study, a pair of circularly bent, bare, weaklyguid<strong>in</strong>g, lossless, multimode and slab optical waveguideswhich are surrounded by a simple medium as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure1, are considered as scatter<strong>in</strong>g objects, and the effect of one ofthe waveguide’s radiation on the other waveguide’s behaviouris exam<strong>in</strong>ed by Geometric Theory of Diffraction (GTD) whichexpla<strong>in</strong>s the diffraction of very high frequency waves byasymptotic methods [3-6].utilized by consider<strong>in</strong>g the propagation directions of theoptical waveguides. It is obvious that, the coupled bare andslab optical waveguides considered <strong>in</strong> this study must be <strong>in</strong> thesame plane.In the analysis, the effective regions of optical waveguides <strong>in</strong>mutual coupl<strong>in</strong>g, which are amongst the important parametersof optical directional couplers, are determ<strong>in</strong>ed. It is observedthat the effected region of one of the circularly bent coupledoptical waveguides by the other optical waveguide is equal tothe longer arc length between the po<strong>in</strong>ts of common <strong>in</strong>ner andouter tangents on the radiation caustic. On the other hand, theeffected region of the other waveguide by this waveguide isequal to the shorter arc length. It is concluded that the aboveobservations are <strong>in</strong>dependent of the propagation directions, <strong>in</strong>other words, of the feed<strong>in</strong>g directions of the opticalwaveguides.In this study, <strong>in</strong> TE and TM leaky modes of opticalwaveguides, the variation <strong>in</strong> the modal propagation constantbecause of coupl<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong>vestigated. As a result of the analysis,it is proved that the coupl<strong>in</strong>g between even TE leaky modes ismore efficient than those amongst the other modes. As anatural consequence of coupl<strong>in</strong>g mechanism, it is observedthat the coupl<strong>in</strong>g amongst the leaky modes and radiationmodes is stronger than those amongst the evanescent fields ofthe guided modes.The authors express their s<strong>in</strong>cere gratitudes to Dr. S. ÖzenÜnverdi for helpful discussions and suggestions.*unverdi@yildiz.edu.trFigure 1. A pair of circularly bent, bare and slab optical waveguides.The path of the light beam on the optical waveguide isdeterm<strong>in</strong>ed by Fermat pr<strong>in</strong>ciple. In this study, it is assumedthat there are not s<strong>in</strong>gular po<strong>in</strong>ts on the surfaces of theanalyzed optical waveguides, all the surface po<strong>in</strong>ts areconsidered as regular. In spite of the fact that, accord<strong>in</strong>g to theGeneral Relativity Theory, the light beams pass<strong>in</strong>g nearby theoptical waveguide without hitt<strong>in</strong>g it are bent towards thewaveguide, the present coupl<strong>in</strong>g analysis neglects this effect.In circularly bent optical waveguides, the radiation is <strong>in</strong> fact<strong>in</strong>side the beam tube. However, <strong>in</strong> this study, where the mutualcoupl<strong>in</strong>g mechanism of optical waveguides is analyzed andeffective lengths are determ<strong>in</strong>ed, the aforementioned beamtube is considered as a s<strong>in</strong>gle beam. In determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g theeffected region of an optical waveguide by the radiation of theother waveguide and the effective region of the radiat<strong>in</strong>goptical waveguide <strong>in</strong> the coupl<strong>in</strong>g phenomena, the “common<strong>in</strong>ternal tangent” and “common external tangent” concepts are[1] A. W. Snyder and J. D. Love, Optical Waveguide Theory, J. W.Arrowsmith Ltd., Bristol - Great Brita<strong>in</strong>, 1983.[2] N. Ö. Ünverdi, “The Effect of Evanescent Fields of GuidedModes and Leaky Modes on Mutual Coupl<strong>in</strong>g of Straight and BentOptical Waveguides”, Ph.D. Thesis, Yıldız Technical University,Istanbul, Turkey, 1998.[3] W. H. Louisell, Coupled Mode Parametric Electronics, JohnWiley & Sons, New York, 1960.[4] C. A. Balanis, Advanced Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Electromagnetics, JohnWiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1989.[5] J. M. Senior, Optical Fiber Communications, Second Edition,Prentice-Hall, Cambridge, 1992.[6] M. N. O. Sadiku, Optical and Wireless Communications, CRCPress, New York, 2002.6th Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Conference, zmir, 2010 629
- Page 1: Poster Presentations3rd Day17 June
- Page 4 and 5: Determination of Dielectric Anisotr
- Page 7 and 8: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 9 and 10: PP mPP vs.P =P,PP (1)P andPoster Se
- Page 11 and 12: PP mPP vs.P =P,PP (1)P andPoster Se
- Page 13 and 14: PP andPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 15 and 16: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 17: PP and770 772 774 776 778 780 782 7
- Page 21 and 22: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 23 and 24: P25,Poster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 25 and 26: PP TOBBPoster Session, Thursday, Ju
- Page 27 and 28: PisPPisisisP,PisPoster Session, Thu
- Page 29 and 30: U NeslihanPPPPoster Session, Thursd
- Page 31 and 32: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 33 and 34: PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 35 and 36: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 37 and 38: P onP viaPP wereP upPoster Session,
- Page 39 and 40: P ·cm.PVPPPsPPPPP andPoster Sessio
- Page 41 and 42: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 43 and 44: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 45 and 46: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 47 and 48: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 49 and 50: PErkanPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 51 and 52: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 53 and 54: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 55 and 56: PPPP andPoster Session, Thursday, J
- Page 57 and 58: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 59 and 60: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 61 and 62: T PeptideTPP,PP,PP andTT2429TTTTTT
- Page 63 and 64: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 65 and 66: PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 67 and 68: Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 69 and 70:
PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 71 and 72:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 73 and 74:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 75 and 76:
PT AdditionalT ThePoster Session, T
- Page 77 and 78:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 79 and 80:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 81 and 82:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 83 and 84:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 85 and 86:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 87 and 88:
PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 89 and 90:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Hu
- Page 91 and 92:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 93 and 94:
PPPPPPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 95 and 96:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 97 and 98:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 99 and 100:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 101 and 102:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 103 and 104:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 105 and 106:
PPPPPPPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 107 and 108:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 109 and 110:
PPPR2R PIN(80)PPgPP OzlemPPoster Se
- Page 111 and 112:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 113 and 114:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 115 and 116:
P onPP toP coordinatedPPoster Sessi
- Page 117 and 118:
PPPPP,PP,P(PR RmPoster Session, Thu
- Page 119 and 120:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 121 and 122:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 123 and 124:
PP InstitutePP DepartmentPoster Ses
- Page 125 and 126:
andPCPPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 127 and 128:
PP scatteringPYusufPP Corresponding
- Page 129 and 130:
PP toPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 131 and 132:
PP andPoster Session, Thursday, Jun
- Page 133 and 134:
PPPPoster Session, Thursday, June 1
- Page 135 and 136:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 137 and 138:
PPP andP (.cm).Poster Session, Thur
- Page 139 and 140:
PP tiltP andP editionPoster Session
- Page 141 and 142:
PP andPPoster Session, Thursday, Ju
- Page 143 and 144:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 145 and 146:
PP forP forP edit.PPoster Session,
- Page 147 and 148:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 149 and 150:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 151 and 152:
PP ionicPP ,PPoster Session, Thursd
- Page 153 and 154:
PP lightPoster Session, Thursday, J
- Page 155 and 156:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 157 and 158:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 159 and 160:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 161 and 162:
PandPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 163 and 164:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17 T
- Page 165 and 166:
PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 167 and 168:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 169 and 170:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 171 and 172:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 173 and 174:
PP DepartmentNanoscienceTPPoster Se
- Page 175 and 176:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 177 and 178:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 179 and 180:
PPPoster Session, Thursday, June 17
- Page 181 and 182:
PPPPPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 183 and 184:
PPPPoster Session, Thursday, June 1
- Page 185 and 186:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 187 and 188:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 189 and 190:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 191 and 192:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 193 and 194:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 195 and 196:
0T0T0T0T AsPPPP werePoster Session,
- Page 197 and 198:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 199 and 200:
PPPPPoster Session, Thursday, June
- Page 201 and 202:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 203 and 204:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 205 and 206:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17Th
- Page 207 and 208:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 209 and 210:
PPoster Session, Thursday, June 17T
- Page 211:
Poster Session, Thursday, June 17AF