11.07.2015 Views

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis of the Siberian Branch of Russian ...

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis of the Siberian Branch of Russian ...

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis of the Siberian Branch of Russian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PP-II-16In this work, we have increased <strong>the</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key reactants in <strong>the</strong> thiosulfateoxidation reaction by chlorite to achieve <strong>the</strong> limit <strong>of</strong> large η. This allowed us, for <strong>the</strong> firsttime, to achieve experimentally zero value <strong>of</strong> non-oscillating reaction front propagationvelocity in a wide rage <strong>of</strong> adverse flow velocities. This corresponds to <strong>the</strong> observation <strong>of</strong>stationary fronts for a range <strong>of</strong> adverse flow velocities, similar to <strong>the</strong> observations made for<strong>the</strong> BZ reaction in a bed <strong>of</strong> glass beads. This can be rationalized as follows. The transportmechanism which governs reaction front propagation is diffusion. When flow is turned on,<strong>the</strong> diffusion in axial direction is essentially quenched, since diffusion along bead wallsimplies a dramatically increased tortuosity factor and possibly a significantly reducedconnectivity for <strong>the</strong> diffusion path. This quenching <strong>of</strong> implies that in <strong>the</strong> adverse flow reactionfront propagates with <strong>the</strong> velocity V – f ≈ 0, as confirmed by <strong>the</strong> calculations.We also demonstrate that it is not appropriate to substitute <strong>the</strong> dispersion coefficient fordiffusivity in <strong>the</strong> reaction-diffusion-advection equation when describing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concentrationfronts in autocatalytic reactions in a wide range <strong>of</strong> flow velocities, in particular if bothsupportive and adverse flows are to be explained. Such substitution completely fails toaccount for <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reaction front in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adverse flow, at least in <strong>the</strong>limiting case described above. Therefore it can be concluded that, an adequate description <strong>of</strong> areaction front behavior in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> advection <strong>the</strong>refore requires that <strong>the</strong> flow velocityfield is taken into account explicitly.Conclusions: In this work we studied mechanisms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> stationary reactionfronts in continuous flow packed-bed reactors. It has been demonstrated that stationary frontsin not <strong>the</strong> exclusive feature <strong>of</strong> Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction, but also can be observed innon-oscillating reactions. Corresponding numerical calculations and experimental evidencesshow that such uncommon dynamic behavior <strong>of</strong> reaction fronts can be explained in term <strong>of</strong>specific influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> advective flow in a packed-bed.Acknowledgements: Authors are grateful for a support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> presrnt work by <strong>the</strong> grantsfrom RFBR (05-03-32472 and 07-03-12147), SB RAS (integration grant # 11) and RAS(5.1.1 and 5.2.3).References:1. M. Kaern, M. Menzinger, Propagation <strong>of</strong> excitation pulses and autocatalytic fronts in packed-bed reactors,J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 3751-3758.2. I.V. Koptyug, V.V. Zhivonitko, R.Z. Sagdeev, Advection <strong>of</strong> chemical reaction fronts in a porous medium,J. Phys. Chem. A, 2008, 112, 1170-1176.301

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!