02.12.2012 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Report - California Off Highway Vehicle ...

Draft Environmental Impact Report - California Off Highway Vehicle ...

Draft Environmental Impact Report - California Off Highway Vehicle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.3 Noise<br />

nonauditory health effects remains a subject of considerable research, with no definitive<br />

conclusions.<br />

The degree to which noise results in annoyance and interference is highly subjective and may be<br />

influenced by several nonacoustic factors. The number and effect of these nonacoustic<br />

environmental and physical factors vary depending on individual characteristics of the noise<br />

environment such as sensitivity, level of activity, location, time of day, and length of exposure. One<br />

key aspect in the prediction of human response to new noise environments is the individual level<br />

of adaptation to an existing noise environment. The greater the change in the noise levels that are<br />

attributed to a new noise source, relative to the environment an individual has become<br />

accustomed to, the less tolerable the new noise source will be to the new noise source.<br />

With respect to how humans perceive and react to changes in noise levels, a 1‐dBA increase is<br />

imperceptible, a 3‐dBA increase is barely perceptible, a 6‐dBA increase is clearly noticeable, and a<br />

10‐dBA increase is subjectively perceived as approximately twice as loud (Egan 1988:21). These<br />

subjective reactions to changes in noise levels were developed on the basis of test subjects’<br />

reactions to changes in the levels of steady‐state pure tones or broad‐band noise and to changes in<br />

levels of a given noise source. It is probably most applicable to noise levels in the range of 50 dBA<br />

to 70 dBA, as this is the usual range of voice and interior noise levels. Depending on the existing<br />

noise environment and the new sources added to it, an increase in noise level of 3 dBA or more is<br />

typically considered perceptible in terms of the existing noise environment.<br />

Fundamental Noise Control Options<br />

Any noise problem may be considered as being composed of three basic elements: the noise<br />

source, a transmission path, and a receptor. The appropriate acoustical treatment for a given<br />

project should consider the nature of the noise source and the sensitivity of the receptor. The<br />

problem should be defined in terms of appropriate criteria (Ldn, Leq, or Lmax); the location of the<br />

sensitive receptor (inside or outside); and the time that the problem occurs (daytime or<br />

nighttime). Noise control techniques should then be selected to provide an acceptable noise<br />

environment for the receiving property while remaining consistent with local aesthetic standards<br />

and practical structural and economic limits. Fundamental noise control options are described<br />

below.<br />

Use of Setbacks<br />

Noise exposure may be reduced by increasing the distance between the noise source and the<br />

receiving use. Setback areas can take the form of, for example, open space, frontage roads,<br />

recreational areas, and storage yards. The available noise attenuation from this technique is<br />

limited by the characteristics of the noise source, but is generally about 4–6 dBA.<br />

Clay Pit State Vehicular Recreation Area<br />

<strong>Draft</strong> EIR 3.3-5 February 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!