02.12.2012 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Report - California Off Highway Vehicle ...

Draft Environmental Impact Report - California Off Highway Vehicle ...

Draft Environmental Impact Report - California Off Highway Vehicle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.11 Climate Change<br />

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.<br />

TABLE 3.11­1. SUMMARY OF MODELED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (CO2e)<br />

FROM IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CLAY PIT SVRA GENERAL PLAN 1<br />

Source of Emissions<br />

2010<br />

(Existing SVRA<br />

Emissions)<br />

MT CO2e<br />

2030<br />

(Clay Pit SVRA<br />

General Plan<br />

Emissions)<br />

2030 with<br />

State<br />

Measures<br />

Net Change 2<br />

Construction – 695 695 695<br />

Amortized construction emissions 3 – 35 35 35<br />

Operational emissions (metric tons per year)<br />

Area sources 4 0 4 0 4<br />

Visitor vehicles 5 1,005 6 732 168 564<br />

OHV 6 48 38 4 34<br />

Maintenance Activities 7 53 0 0 0<br />

Total operational emissions 1,106 829 – 602<br />

Total operational emissions including<br />

amortized construction emissions<br />

1,106 861 – 636<br />

Notes: AB = Assembly bill; MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent; OHV = off‐highway vehicle;<br />

SMAQMD = Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District.<br />

1 The values presented do not include the full life cycle of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The GHG emissions<br />

from producing and transporting the construction and maintenance materials used under the Clay Pit SVRA<br />

General Plan, from solid waste that would be generated over the life of the project, or from end of life processes<br />

(e.g., recycling of materials) that would occur as an indirect result of the project. Estimating the GHG emissions<br />

associated with these processes would require analysis beyond the current state of the art in impact assessment<br />

and may lead to a false or misleading level of precision in reporting operational GHG emissions. Furthermore,<br />

indirect emissions associated with in‐state energy production and generation of solid waste would be regulated<br />

under AB 32 directly at the source or facility that would handle these processes. The emissions associated with off‐<br />

site facilities (e.g., for manufacturing plants, landfills) in <strong>California</strong> would be closely controlled, reported, capped,<br />

and traded under AB 32 and <strong>California</strong> CARB programs, as recommended by CARB’s scoping plan (CARB 2008).<br />

Therefore, it is assumed that GHG emissions associated with these life‐cycle stages would be consistent with AB 32<br />

requirements.<br />

2 Net decreases are shown in parenthesis.<br />

3 Construction emissions were amortized over a 20‐year period and added to operational emissions per the<br />

methodology recommended by SMAQMD (SMAQMD 2009).<br />

4 Area source emissions include emissions associated with propane combustion for space and water heating.<br />

5 Mobile source emissions estimated including <strong>California</strong>’s Pavley clean‐air standards and Low Carbon Fuel Standard.<br />

6 <strong>Off</strong>‐road source emissions estimated including <strong>California</strong>’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard.<br />

7 Existing maintenance operations would continue through 2030. No increase in maintenance activities is anticipated.<br />

Source: Modeling performed by AECOM in 2011; Appendix C<br />

Clay Pit State Vehicular Recreation Area<br />

February 2012 3.11-8 <strong>Draft</strong> EIR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!