100<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the Futureexperimentation, is needed, conta<strong>in</strong>edwith<strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g recommendations:• Broaden the agroecological focus <strong>of</strong>agr<strong>of</strong>orestry and biodiversity studies to<strong>in</strong>clude more drylands and annual cropbasedsystems.• Identify the key features <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestrysystems – species composition, configuration,management, landscape position– that are most critical to support<strong>in</strong>gbiodiversity <strong>in</strong> the landscape and <strong>in</strong>multiuse areas around protected areas.• Evaluate the conditions under whichmarket-led domestication and on-farmhusbandry <strong>of</strong> valuable <strong>in</strong>digenous treescan stimulate a sequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creasedtree plant<strong>in</strong>g, more <strong>in</strong>tensive land use,and less pressure on forest and land resources.• Assess the landscape-level effects <strong>of</strong>new agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems, such as theimproved fallows and rotational woodlotspromoted <strong>in</strong> southern Africa.• Give higher priority to the <strong>challenge</strong>s<strong>of</strong> alien <strong>in</strong>vasive species, with specialemphasis on the development <strong>of</strong>management plans for species that havebeen associated with agr<strong>of</strong>orestry.• Expand the use <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems<strong>in</strong> degraded lands to help restore theproductivity and biodiversity <strong>of</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>allands.• Fully explore the refuge value <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestrysystems, such as those studiedby Grif<strong>fit</strong>h (2000).• Conduct more research <strong>in</strong>to theimportant functions and roles thattree diversity plays <strong>in</strong> landscapes forconserv<strong>in</strong>g lesser-known aspects <strong>of</strong>biodiversity, provid<strong>in</strong>g other environmentalservices, and bene<strong>fit</strong><strong>in</strong>glivelihoods.Acknowledgement<strong>The</strong> authors gratefully acknowledge commentsfrom Louise Buck, MohammedBakarr and Tom Tomich on a previousdraft <strong>of</strong> this chapter.ReferencesAngelsen, A. and D. Kaimowitz 2004. Is agr<strong>of</strong>orestrylikely to reduce deforestation? Chapter5, pp. 87–106, <strong>in</strong>: Schroth, G., G.A.B.da Fonseca, C.A. Harvey, C. Gascon, H.L.Vasconcelos and A.M.N. Izac (eds) Agr<strong>of</strong>orestryand Biodiversity Conservation <strong>in</strong>Tropical Landscapes. Island Press, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton,DC, USA.Barrow, E., and W. Mlenge 2003. Trees as key topastoralist risk management <strong>in</strong> semi-aridlandscapes <strong>in</strong> Sh<strong>in</strong>yanga, Tanzania andTurkana, Kenya. Paper presented at theInternational Conference on Rural Livelihoods,Forests and Biodiversity 19–23May 2003, Bonn, Germany.B<strong>of</strong>fa, J-M. 1999. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry parklands <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa. FAO Conservation Guide34. Food and Agriculture Organization <strong>of</strong>the United Nations, Rome, Italy. (http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/X3940E/X3940E00.htm)Buck, L.E., T.A. Gav<strong>in</strong>, D.R. Lee, N.T. Uph<strong>of</strong>f, D.C.Behr, L.E. Dr<strong>in</strong>kwater, W.D. Hively and F.R.Werner 2004. Ecoagriculture: A Review andAssessment <strong>of</strong> its Scientific Foundations.Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.Cunn<strong>in</strong>gham, A.B., S.J. Scherr and J.A. Mc-Neely 2002. Matrix Matters: BiodiversityResearch for Rural Landscape Mosaics.Center for International Forestry Researchand <strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Centre, Bogor,Indonesia.Donald, P.F. 2004. Biodiversity impacts <strong>of</strong> someagricultural commodity production systems.Conservation Biology 18(1): 17–37.Garrity, D., V.B. Amoroso, S. K<strong>of</strong>fa, D. Catacutan,G. Buenavista, P. Fay and W. Dar2002. Landcare on the poverty–protection<strong>in</strong>terface <strong>in</strong> an Asian watershed. ConservationEcology 6(1): 12.Gillison, A.N., N. Liswanti, S. Budidarsono, M.van Noordwijk, and T.P. Tomich 2004.Impact <strong>of</strong> cropp<strong>in</strong>g methods on biodiversity<strong>in</strong> c<strong>of</strong>fee agroecosystems <strong>in</strong> Sumatra,Indonesia. Ecology and Society 9(2): 7.Govere, I. 2002. Improved tree fallow andnatural miombo woodland use <strong>in</strong> EasternZambia: <strong>The</strong> potential <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>the conservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>digenous forests.MSc <strong>The</strong>sis, Department <strong>of</strong> AgriculturalEconomics and Extension, University <strong>of</strong>Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.Grif<strong>fit</strong>h, D.M. 2000. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry: A refuge fortropical biodiversity after fire. ConservationBiology 14(1): 325–326.Khan, M.L. and A. Arunachalam 2003. Traditionalagr<strong>of</strong>orestry as a viable choice toconserve agro-biodiversity <strong>in</strong> the northeastIndia. Pp. 95–105 <strong>in</strong> Pathak, P.S. and R.Newaj (eds) Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry: Potentials andOpportunities. Agrobios (India) and IndianSociety <strong>of</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry, Jodhpur, India.K<strong>in</strong>dt, R. 2002. Methodology for tree speciesdiversification plann<strong>in</strong>g for African agroecosystems.PhD thesis, University <strong>of</strong>Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.Leakey R.R.B. 1996. Def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestryrevisited. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Today 8(1): 5–7.Leakey, R. 2004. Domestication and market<strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> novel crops for ecoagriculture. Paperpresented at the International EcoagricultureConference and Practitioner’s Fair 27September–1 October 2004, <strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestryCentre, Nairobi, Kenya.
Chapter 11: <strong>The</strong> potential for agr<strong>of</strong>orestry101McNeely, J.A. 2004. Nature vs. nurture: Manag<strong>in</strong>grelationships between forests, agr<strong>of</strong>orestryand wild biodiversity. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestrySystems 61: 155–165.McNeely, J.A. and S.J. Scherr 2003. Ecoagriculture:Strategies to Feed the <strong>World</strong>and Save Wild Biodiversity. Island Press,Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, USA.Michon, G. and H. de Foresta 1995. <strong>The</strong> Indonesianagro-forest model. Forest resourcemanagement and biodiversity conservation.Pp. 90–106 <strong>in</strong>: Halladay, P. and D.A.Gilmour (eds) Conserv<strong>in</strong>g BiodiversityOutside Protected Areas. <strong>The</strong> Role OfTraditional Agro-ecosystems. <strong>World</strong>Conservation Union, Forest ConservationProgramme, Andalucía, Spa<strong>in</strong>.Misana, S.B., A.E. Majule and H.V. Lyaruu 2003.L<strong>in</strong>kages between changes <strong>in</strong> land use,biodiversity and land degradation on theslopes <strong>of</strong> Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.LUCID Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper Number 38. InternationalLivestock Research Institute,Nairobi, Kenya.Mrema, M., D. Wafula and J. Sekatuba 2001a.Livelihood strategies and the use <strong>of</strong> treeand forest products <strong>in</strong> the Mabira Forestbuffer zone. <strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Centre(ICRAF), Kampala, Uganda.Mrema, M., D. Wafula and J. Sekatuba. 2001b.<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> tree and forest products by local<strong>in</strong>dustries: <strong>The</strong> case <strong>of</strong> sugar and teaestates <strong>in</strong> the Mabira buffer zone <strong>of</strong> Mukono.<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Centre (ICRAF),Kampala, Uganda.Mrema, M., D. Wafula and J. Sekatuba. 2001c.<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> tree and forest products bylocal <strong>in</strong>stitutions and households <strong>in</strong> theurban centres surround<strong>in</strong>g the Mabirabuffer zone. <strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Centre(ICRAF), Kampala, Uganda.Mrema, M., D. Wafula and J. Sekatuba. 2001d.Market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> tree and forest products <strong>in</strong>the buffer zone <strong>of</strong> Mabira Forest and surround<strong>in</strong>gtowns. <strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Centre(ICRAF), Kampala, Uganda.Murdiyarso, D., M. van Noordwijk, U.R. Wasr<strong>in</strong>,T.P. Tomich and A.N. Gillison 2002.Environmental bene<strong>fit</strong>s and susta<strong>in</strong>ableland-use options <strong>in</strong> the Jambi transect,Sumatra, Indonesia. Journal <strong>of</strong> VegetationScience 13: 429–438.Murniati, D.P. Garrity and A.N. G<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs 2001.<strong>The</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems toreduc<strong>in</strong>g farmers’ dependence on the resources<strong>of</strong> adjacent national parks: A casestudy from Sumatra. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Systems52: 171–184.Naidoo, R. 2004. Species richness and communitycomposition <strong>of</strong> songbirds <strong>in</strong> a tropicalforest-agriculture landscape. Animal Conservation7: 93–105.Noble, I.R. and R. Dirzo 1997. Forests as human-dom<strong>in</strong>atedecosystems. Science 277:522–525.Ramadhani, T., R. Otsy<strong>in</strong>a and S. Franzel 2002.Improv<strong>in</strong>g household <strong>in</strong>comes and reduc<strong>in</strong>gdeforestation us<strong>in</strong>g rotational woodlots<strong>in</strong> Tabora district, Tanzania. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment 89: 229–239.Schroth, G., G.A.B. da Fonseca, C.A. Harvey, C.Gascon, H.L. Vasconcelos and A.M.N. Izac(eds) 2004a. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry and BiodiversityConservation <strong>in</strong> Tropical Landscapes.Island Press, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, USA.Schroth, G., C.A. Harvey and G. V<strong>in</strong>cent 2004b.Complex agr<strong>of</strong>orests: <strong>The</strong>ir structure,diversity and potential role <strong>in</strong> landscapeconservation. Chapter 10, Pp. 227–260<strong>in</strong>: Schroth, G., G.A.B. da Fonseca, C.A.Harvey, C. Gascon, H.L. Vasconcelos andA.M.N. Izac (eds) Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry and BiodiversityConservation <strong>in</strong> Tropical Landscapes.Island Press, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, USA.So<strong>in</strong>i, E. 2004. Birds <strong>in</strong> three habitats on thesouthern slopes <strong>of</strong> Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.Unpublished manuscript.So<strong>in</strong>i, E. 2005. Dynamics <strong>of</strong> livelihood strategies<strong>in</strong> the chang<strong>in</strong>g landscapes <strong>of</strong> the southernslopes <strong>of</strong> Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.Agricultural Systems 85(3): 306–323.Tomich, T.P., M. van Noordwijk, S.A. Vosti andJ. Witcover 1998. Agricultural Economics19 (1998): 159–174.Tomich, T.P., M. van Noordwijk, S. Budidarsono,A. Gillison, T. Kusumanto, M. Murdiyarso,F. Stolle and A.M. Fagi 2001. Agricultural<strong>in</strong>tensification, deforestation, and the environment:Assess<strong>in</strong>g trade<strong>of</strong>fs <strong>in</strong> Sumatra,Indonesia. In: Lee, D.R. and C.B. Barrett(eds) Trade<strong>of</strong>fs or Synergies? AgriculturalIntensification, Economic Developmentand the Environment. CAB International,Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, UK.van Noordwijk, M., G. Cadish and C.K. Ong2004. Below-ground Interactions <strong>in</strong> TropicalAgroecosystems. CAB International,Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, UK.van Noordwijk, M., T.P. Tomich, H. de Forestaand G. Michon 1997. To segregate orto <strong>in</strong>tegrate? <strong>The</strong> question <strong>of</strong> balancebetween production and biodiversity conservation<strong>in</strong> complex agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems.Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Today 9(1): 6–9.Zomer, R.J., S.L. Ust<strong>in</strong> and C.C. Carpenter 2001.Land cover change along tropical andsub-tropical riparian corridors with<strong>in</strong> theMakalu Barun National Park and ConservationArea, Nepal. Mounta<strong>in</strong> Researchand Development 21(2): 175–183.
- Page 4 and 5:
CitationGarrity, D., A. Okono, M. G
- Page 6 and 7:
Enhancing Environmental ServicesCha
- Page 8 and 9:
viWorld Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 10 and 11:
viiiWorld Agroforestry into the Fut
- Page 13 and 14:
Agroforestry and the Future
- Page 15 and 16:
Keywords:Millennium Development Goa
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 21 and 22:
Trees and Markets
- Page 23 and 24:
Keywords:Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 35 and 36:
Keywords:Perennial tree crops, plan
- Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 43 and 44:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 47:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 50 and 51:
38World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 52 and 53:
40World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 54 and 55:
“Trees influence landscape scaled
- Page 56 and 57:
44World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 58 and 59:
46World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 60 and 61:
48World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 62 and 63: 50World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 65 and 66: Keywords:Agroforestry, improved fal
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 73 and 74: Keywords:Extension, farmer-centred
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 83 and 84: Keywords:Policy, land management, a
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 9Land and People:Working Gr
- Page 93: Chapter 9: Land and people81• sca
- Page 96 and 97: “Forest conservation is no longer
- Page 98 and 99: 86World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 100 and 101: 88World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 102 and 103: 90World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 104 and 105: 92World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 106 and 107: 94World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 108 and 109: 96World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 110 and 111: 98World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 115 and 116: Keywords:Agroforestry, buffering wa
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 125 and 126: Keywords:Agroforestry, vulnerabilit
- Page 127 and 128: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 129 and 130: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 133: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 136 and 137: 124World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 138 and 139: 126World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 140 and 141: “Agroforestry can and does playa
- Page 142 and 143: 130World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 144 and 145: 132World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 147 and 148: Keywords:Educational impact, sustai
- Page 149 and 150: Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 151 and 152: Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 153 and 154: Keywords:Networking, research-exten
- Page 155 and 156: Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 159 and 160: Keywords:Capacity building, agrofor
- Page 161 and 162: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 165 and 166:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 167 and 168:
Keywords:E-learning, agricultural e
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 20Strengthening Institution
- Page 177:
Chapter 20: Strengthening instituti
- Page 180 and 181:
168“The biological characteristic
- Page 182 and 183:
170World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 184 and 185:
172World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 186 and 187:
174World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 188 and 189:
176World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 190 and 191:
178World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 192 and 193:
180World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 194 and 195:
182World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 196 and 197:
184World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 198 and 199:
186World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 200 and 201:
188World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 202 and 203:
190World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 205 and 206:
Author ContactsFahmudin Agusisri@in
- Page 207 and 208:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsACIARAFTP
- Page 210:
CreditsFront cover photo: Karen Rob
- Page 213:
World Agroforestry into the Future