14<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the FutureIdentification, capture, retention andprotection <strong>of</strong> genetic diversityDomestication has been def<strong>in</strong>ed as human<strong>in</strong>ducedchange <strong>in</strong> the genetics <strong>of</strong> a speciesto conform to human desires and agroecosystems(Harlan 1975). It is not surpris<strong>in</strong>gtherefore, that much <strong>of</strong> the work to domesticateagr<strong>of</strong>orestry trees has focused on boththe identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>traspecific genetic variability<strong>of</strong> the priority species and the vegetativepropagation techniques to capturethese superior comb<strong>in</strong>ations. However, onedesirable trait is not necessarily correlatedwith another: thus large fruits are not necessarilysweet fruits, and do not necessarilyconta<strong>in</strong> large nuts or kernels. This multitraitvariation, coupled with the variability <strong>of</strong>each <strong>in</strong>dividual trait, results <strong>in</strong> a considerableopportunity for selection <strong>of</strong> trees withgood comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong> traits, but also makesit more unlikely that an ideal tree will befound. Thus, large numbers <strong>of</strong> trees have tobe screened to f<strong>in</strong>d the rare comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong>traits. This rapidly becomes impractical andvery expensive. Consequently, the practicalapproach is to search for trees that have particularmarket-oriented trait comb<strong>in</strong>ations(or ideotypes) – such as big, sweet fruits forthe fresh fruit market (a fruit ideotype) orbig, easily extracted kernels for the kernelmarket (kernel ideotype), etc.Trees can also be selected for production traitssuch as yield, seasonality and regularity <strong>of</strong> production,reproductive biology, and reduction<strong>of</strong> susceptibility to pests and diseases (Kengueet al. 2002). High yield is obviously a desirabletrait <strong>in</strong> any cultivar, but, with<strong>in</strong> reason, may notbe as important <strong>in</strong> the early stages <strong>of</strong> domesticationas the quality attributes. Fruit<strong>in</strong>g seasontime/length, ripen<strong>in</strong>g period and seedlessnessare other important variables that could be selectedfor (Anegbeh et al. 2005).Such great <strong>in</strong>traspecific genetic diversityneeds to be preserved. Domestication isgenerally considered to reduce geneticdiversity, a situation that may occur wherethe domesticated plant replaces or dom<strong>in</strong>atesthe wild orig<strong>in</strong>, but is probably notthe case at the current level <strong>of</strong> domestication<strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry trees. For example, therange <strong>of</strong> fruit sizes <strong>in</strong> on-farm populations<strong>of</strong> Dacryodes edulis and Irv<strong>in</strong>gia gabonensishas been <strong>in</strong>creased by the early stages<strong>of</strong> domestication (Leakey et al. 2004).Nevertheless, the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>of</strong> geneticdiversity is essential. Modern moleculartechniques can identify the ‘hot-spots’ <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>traspecific diversity (Lowe et al. 2000),which should, if possible, be protectedfor <strong>in</strong> situ genetic conservation, or be thesource <strong>of</strong> germplasm collections if ex situconservation is required. In addition, whendevelop<strong>in</strong>g cultivars, they should orig<strong>in</strong>atefrom unrelated populations with very differentgenetic structures.Hav<strong>in</strong>g identified the superior trees withthe desired traits, the capture <strong>of</strong> tree-to-treevariation us<strong>in</strong>g techniques <strong>of</strong> vegetativepropagation is relatively simple and wellunderstood (Leakey 2004b; Leakey et al.1996; Mudge and Brennan 1999). Cutt<strong>in</strong>gsfrom mature trees have a low rate <strong>of</strong> propagativesuccess, and the number <strong>of</strong> peoplewith the appropriate skills to carry it outmay be a constra<strong>in</strong>t to its widespread application<strong>in</strong> the future (Simons and Leakey2004). However, propagation by juvenileleafy cutt<strong>in</strong>gs is very easy for almost all treespecies and is currently the preferred optionfor participatory domestication <strong>in</strong> villagenurseries (Mbile et al. 2004; Mialoundamaet al. 2002; Shiembo et al. 1996;Tchoundjeu et al. 2002b).Cultivation and the growth <strong>of</strong> cultivars<strong>The</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al stage <strong>of</strong> the domestication processis the optimal <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> selected plants<strong>in</strong>to the farm<strong>in</strong>g system (Leakey and Newton1994a; 1994b). In African farmland, awide range <strong>of</strong> densities and configurationsare grown (K<strong>in</strong>dt 2002). In Cameroon, forexample, cocoa agr<strong>of</strong>orests have beenreported to conta<strong>in</strong> around 500 cocoabushes grow<strong>in</strong>g with 15 other types <strong>of</strong> treesand shrubs (Gockowski and Dury 1999).Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry is expected to provide positiveenvironmental bene<strong>fit</strong>s on climate changeand biodiversity (Millennium DevelopmentGoal 7). However, research is needed todeterm<strong>in</strong>e the impacts <strong>of</strong> such diversity onagroecosystem function (Gliessman 1998;Leakey 1999b; Mbile et al. 2003); carbonsequestration (Gockowski et al. 2001) andtrace gas fluxes; and on the susta<strong>in</strong>ability<strong>of</strong> production and household livelihoods.Markets<strong>The</strong> term agr<strong>of</strong>orestry tree products (AFTPs)is <strong>of</strong> very recent orig<strong>in</strong> (Simons and Leakey2004) and refers to timber and non-timberforest products (NTFPs) that are sourcedfrom trees cultivated outside <strong>of</strong> forests, todist<strong>in</strong>guish them from NTFPs extractedfrom natural systems. However, someproducts will be marketed as both NTFPsand AFTPs dur<strong>in</strong>g the period <strong>of</strong> transitionfrom wild resources to newly domesticatedcrops. Consequently, both terms are used<strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g sections.Economic and social bene<strong>fit</strong>s fromtrad<strong>in</strong>g AFTPsTo be effective, there must be a l<strong>in</strong>k betweentree domestication and productcommercialization, which requires the<strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong> food, pharmaceutical andother <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> the identification <strong>of</strong> thecharacteristics that will determ<strong>in</strong>e marketacceptability (Leakey 1999a). In West andCentral Africa, a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>digenousfruits and nuts, mostly gathered from farmtrees, contribute to regional trade (Ndoyeet al. 1997). In Cameroon, the annual trade<strong>in</strong> products from five key species has been
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for agr<strong>of</strong>orestry tree products15valued at US$7.5 million, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g exportsworth US$2.5 million (Awono et al.2002). Women are <strong>of</strong>ten the beneficiaries<strong>of</strong> this trade; they have especially <strong>in</strong>dicatedtheir <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g D. edulis fruitsbecause the fruit<strong>in</strong>g season co<strong>in</strong>cideswith the time to pay school fees and tobuy school uniforms (Schreckenberg etal. 2002). It is also the women who arethe ma<strong>in</strong> retailers <strong>of</strong> NTFPs (Awono et al.2002). Marula (Scleocarya birrea) is anotherfruit with a harvest<strong>in</strong>g season thatco<strong>in</strong>cides with the start <strong>of</strong> the school year,and therefore the greater <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong>women.<strong>The</strong>se tangible market bene<strong>fit</strong>s are supplementedby additional bene<strong>fit</strong>s such as theavailability <strong>of</strong> products for domestic consumption,the use <strong>of</strong> household labour forharvest<strong>in</strong>g/process<strong>in</strong>g free <strong>of</strong> charge, andease <strong>of</strong> access to <strong>in</strong>formal markets, etc. Becausethe production and trad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> AFTPsare based on traditional lifestyles, it is relativelyeasy for new producers to enter withm<strong>in</strong>imal skills, little capital and with fewneeds for external <strong>in</strong>puts. Together thesemake this approach to <strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>g productionand enhanc<strong>in</strong>g household livelihoodsvery easy, and adoptable by poor people.<strong>The</strong> l<strong>in</strong>kages between domesticationand commercialization <strong>of</strong> AFTPsAs already <strong>in</strong>dicated, domestication thatis market-orientated has the greatest likelihood<strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g adopted on a scale thathas impact on the economic, social andenvironmental problems afflict<strong>in</strong>g manytropical countries. This requires that agr<strong>of</strong>oresterswork closely with the companiesprocess<strong>in</strong>g and market<strong>in</strong>g the products(Leakey 1999a). However, <strong>in</strong> do<strong>in</strong>g this itis important to remember that smallholderfarmers are the clients <strong>of</strong> the research anddevelopment (R&D) work and that thereneeds to be a functional production–to–consumption cha<strong>in</strong>; pr<strong>in</strong>ciples that wereapparently forgotten dur<strong>in</strong>g recent domestication<strong>of</strong> peach palm (Bactris gasipaes) <strong>in</strong>Amazonia, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the underperformance<strong>of</strong> the market (Clement et al. 2004).In many cases, the successful commercialization<strong>of</strong> AFTPs relies on domestication toensure that supply can keep up with thegrow<strong>in</strong>g demand <strong>of</strong> a develop<strong>in</strong>g market.Through cultivar development, domesticationcan also help to overcome anotherconstra<strong>in</strong>t to commercialization: variability<strong>of</strong> quality (taste, size and purity). Domesticationcan also lead to an extended season<strong>of</strong> production, as is be<strong>in</strong>g done <strong>in</strong> WestAfrica with D. edulis, mak<strong>in</strong>g it easier tosupply <strong>in</strong>dustries throughout the year. Kiwifruit (Act<strong>in</strong>idia ch<strong>in</strong>ensis) and macadamianuts (Macadamia <strong>in</strong>tegrifolia) are good examples<strong>of</strong> co-ord<strong>in</strong>ated domestication andcommercialization.<strong>The</strong> important question here is whetheragr<strong>of</strong>orestry can prevent the negative impactsthat result from domesticat<strong>in</strong>g crops<strong>in</strong> a monoculture system, which can causeenvironmental degradation through deforestation,soil erosion, nutrient m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g andloss <strong>of</strong> biodiversity. <strong>The</strong>se systems can alsoresult <strong>in</strong> social <strong>in</strong>equity and the ‘povertytrap’ for small-scale producers who are unableto compete <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational trade withlarge or mult<strong>in</strong>ational companies. In theory,agr<strong>of</strong>orestry is beneficial to the environmentand beneficial to the poor farmer.However, if the domestication <strong>of</strong> AFTPs isso successful that the market demand forone <strong>of</strong> them reaches the po<strong>in</strong>t where monocultureplantations, either <strong>in</strong> the country<strong>of</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> or <strong>in</strong> some overseas location, areviable, this could underm<strong>in</strong>e the wholepurpose <strong>of</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g new crops. Withoutmarkets there will not be the opportunityfor subsistence households to <strong>in</strong>crease theirstandard <strong>of</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g, while expanded marketopportunities could lead to their exploitationby unscrupulous entrepreneurs. Hav<strong>in</strong>gsaid that, recogniz<strong>in</strong>g the traditionalrole <strong>of</strong> NTFPs/AFTPs <strong>in</strong> food security,health and <strong>in</strong>come generation, it is clearthat the potential bene<strong>fit</strong>s from domesticationoutweigh the risks, and that commercializationis both necessary and potentiallyharmful to small-scale farmers practis<strong>in</strong>gagr<strong>of</strong>orestry (Leakey and Izac 1996).Important areas for further study <strong>in</strong>cludethe complex issues surround<strong>in</strong>g commercialization<strong>of</strong> genetic resources and bene<strong>fit</strong>shar<strong>in</strong>g (ten Kate and Laird 1999) and traditionalknowledge (Laird 2002) and ways<strong>in</strong> which smallholder farmers can securetheir <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights on farmerderived<strong>in</strong>novations.One strategy that reduces risk is to domesticatea wide range <strong>of</strong> AFTP tree species,especially those with local and regionalmarket potential. In this way, coupled withstrong <strong>in</strong>digenous rights, it is very unlikelythat the market demand will attract majorcompanies and, even if products <strong>of</strong> a fewspecies do become <strong>in</strong>ternational commodities,there will be others that rema<strong>in</strong>.Not all <strong>in</strong>terest from <strong>in</strong>ternational companies<strong>in</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry is unwelcome. Forexample, Daimler-Benz has taken a smallholder,multistrata agr<strong>of</strong>orestry approachto produc<strong>in</strong>g raw materials for its C-classMercedes-Benz cars <strong>in</strong> Brazil, and <strong>in</strong>partnership with the International F<strong>in</strong>anceCorporation has been develop<strong>in</strong>g this asa new paradigm for public–private sectorpartnerships (Mitsche<strong>in</strong> and Miranda 1998;Panik 1998). Smallholder cocoa farmers <strong>in</strong>Africa and Asia are supported by chocolatierMasterfoods (formerly M&M Mars) asthey diversify their cocoa farms <strong>in</strong>to cocoaagr<strong>of</strong>orests, <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g fruit trees (<strong>of</strong>ten<strong>in</strong>digenous species) <strong>in</strong>to the cocoa farm
- Page 4 and 5: CitationGarrity, D., A. Okono, M. G
- Page 6 and 7: Enhancing Environmental ServicesCha
- Page 8 and 9: viWorld Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 10 and 11: viiiWorld Agroforestry into the Fut
- Page 13 and 14: Agroforestry and the Future
- Page 15 and 16: Keywords:Millennium Development Goa
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 21 and 22: Trees and Markets
- Page 23 and 24: Keywords:Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia
- Page 25: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 35 and 36: Keywords:Perennial tree crops, plan
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 47: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 50 and 51: 38World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 52 and 53: 40World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 54 and 55: “Trees influence landscape scaled
- Page 56 and 57: 44World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 58 and 59: 46World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 60 and 61: 48World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 62 and 63: 50World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 65 and 66: Keywords:Agroforestry, improved fal
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 73 and 74: Keywords:Extension, farmer-centred
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 83 and 84:
Keywords:Policy, land management, a
- Page 85 and 86:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 87 and 88:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 91 and 92:
Chapter 9Land and People:Working Gr
- Page 93:
Chapter 9: Land and people81• sca
- Page 96 and 97:
“Forest conservation is no longer
- Page 98 and 99:
86World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 100 and 101:
88World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 102 and 103:
90World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 104 and 105:
92World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 106 and 107:
94World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 108 and 109:
96World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 110 and 111:
98World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 112 and 113:
100World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 115 and 116:
Keywords:Agroforestry, buffering wa
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 125 and 126:
Keywords:Agroforestry, vulnerabilit
- Page 127 and 128:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 129 and 130:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 133:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 136 and 137:
124World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 138 and 139:
126World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 140 and 141:
“Agroforestry can and does playa
- Page 142 and 143:
130World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 144 and 145:
132World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 147 and 148:
Keywords:Educational impact, sustai
- Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 153 and 154:
Keywords:Networking, research-exten
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 159 and 160:
Keywords:Capacity building, agrofor
- Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 165 and 166:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 167 and 168:
Keywords:E-learning, agricultural e
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 20Strengthening Institution
- Page 177:
Chapter 20: Strengthening instituti
- Page 180 and 181:
168“The biological characteristic
- Page 182 and 183:
170World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 184 and 185:
172World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 186 and 187:
174World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 188 and 189:
176World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 190 and 191:
178World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 192 and 193:
180World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 194 and 195:
182World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 196 and 197:
184World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 198 and 199:
186World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 200 and 201:
188World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 202 and 203:
190World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 205 and 206:
Author ContactsFahmudin Agusisri@in
- Page 207 and 208:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsACIARAFTP
- Page 210:
CreditsFront cover photo: Karen Rob
- Page 213:
World Agroforestry into the Future