170<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the Futureand economic role and promot<strong>in</strong>g theirconsideration at the policy level and <strong>in</strong>the assessment <strong>of</strong> the world’s forest resources.‘Trees outside forests’ are def<strong>in</strong>ed as ‘treesfound on non-forest and non-wood lands’,such as: agricultural lands, urban and settlementareas, roadsides, homegardens,hedgerows, pasture/rangelands and scattered<strong>in</strong> the landscape (FAO 2000). <strong>The</strong>concept recognizes the biological characteristics<strong>of</strong> trees and their ability to provideenvironmental, social, cultural and economicbene<strong>fit</strong>s.S<strong>in</strong>ce 1999, the Food and AgricultureOrganization <strong>of</strong> the United Nations (FAO)has been work<strong>in</strong>g to raise awareness <strong>of</strong> TOFand to dispel the idea that tree resourcesare only important for small-scale farmersor those that make a limited contribution tosusta<strong>in</strong>able forest resource management.Multiple roles and bene<strong>fit</strong>s <strong>of</strong>trees outside forestsFood and other essential goodsTOF have been called ‘trees that nourish’,particularly for many poor and landlesspeople who obta<strong>in</strong> essential productsfrom them (Manu and Halavatau 1995).Many tree species found <strong>in</strong> African andAsian agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems (e.g., Borassusaethiopum, Balanites aegyptiaca, Ziziphusmauritiana) are planted for their ability toproduce large quantities <strong>of</strong> food and othernon-wood forest products (see Box 1).Wood and fuelwood productsIn develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, TOF providesa large proportion <strong>of</strong> the fuelwood fordomestic energy (cook<strong>in</strong>g and heat). Forexample, 50 percent <strong>of</strong> fuelwood used <strong>in</strong>Thailand, 75–85 percent <strong>in</strong> Indonesia, Java,Pakistan, the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, Sri Lanka andVietnam and 83 percent <strong>in</strong> Keralla, India(FAO 2001a; Jensen 1995) is harvestedfrom farmland and other non-forest land.In many countries, farmers and smallholdersplant trees (especially valuable timberspecies) as a means <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g for the future(FAO 2001a; Negreros-Castillo and Mize2002).Fodder supplyMany pastoralists use TOF as a source <strong>of</strong>fodder for livestock <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cattle, camels,sheep and goats (see Box 2). Recentcase studies from Lat<strong>in</strong> America have highlightedthe importance <strong>of</strong> trees <strong>in</strong> livestockproduction, s<strong>in</strong>ce they provide shade, shelterand supplementary fodder, particularly<strong>in</strong> the dry rangelands and low forest coverareas (Sanchez et al. 1998). In the aridparts <strong>of</strong> sub-Saharan Africa, three-quarters<strong>of</strong> the 10 000 woody species that grow <strong>in</strong>silvipastoral systems are thought to be usedas fodder, supply<strong>in</strong>g up to 50 percent <strong>of</strong>livestock feed (FAO 2001a), particularly <strong>in</strong>the dry season when grass and crop residuesare not available.Susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>of</strong> agriculturalproduction<strong>The</strong> most universally recognized roleplayed by trees <strong>in</strong> agricultural systems isthat <strong>of</strong> soil conservation and the replenishment<strong>of</strong> soil fertility (Chivaura-Mususa et al.2000; Sanchez et al. 1998). In many parts<strong>of</strong> the world, improved tree-based systems,e.g., shelterbelts, w<strong>in</strong>dbreaks, alley cropp<strong>in</strong>g,hedgerows and tree cover crops, e.g.,c<strong>of</strong>fee, cacao, coconut, olive and citrushave been <strong>in</strong>tegrated with<strong>in</strong> croplands(Huax<strong>in</strong> 2001; IRDC 2000; Jensen 1995).<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> such nitrogen-fix<strong>in</strong>g woodyspecies <strong>in</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry parklands <strong>in</strong> WestAfrica as Acacia albida, Vitallaria paradoxaBox 1. TOF for foodBorassus aethiopum (Fan palm)<strong>The</strong> kernel and mesocarp <strong>of</strong> the fruitcan be eaten raw or roasted and providesnourish<strong>in</strong>g carbohydrate, prote<strong>in</strong>and m<strong>in</strong>erals. <strong>The</strong> jelly-like, immaturefruit is delicious, and a decoction <strong>of</strong> theroots makes a cool<strong>in</strong>g dr<strong>in</strong>k for <strong>in</strong>fants.Sprouts grown from the nuts are commonlyeaten as a vegetable, the sap isused to make w<strong>in</strong>e and the leaves aresuitable for weav<strong>in</strong>g ro<strong>of</strong>s and fences.Vitellaria paradoxa (Shea nut tree)<strong>The</strong> pulp is eaten raw and suppliescarbohydrate, m<strong>in</strong>erals and vitam<strong>in</strong>s.<strong>The</strong> kernel supplies oil used <strong>in</strong> cook<strong>in</strong>g,cosmetics, candles, and even forwaterpro<strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>g the walls <strong>of</strong> farmers’homes. In Burk<strong>in</strong>a Faso, annual yields <strong>of</strong>48–65 kg ha –1 <strong>of</strong> fresh nuts are common.Some 40 000–75 000 t are exported toEurope and 10 000–15 000 t to Japan,where they are used <strong>in</strong> cosmetics, pharmaceuticalsand bak<strong>in</strong>g.Source: FAO (2001a)Box 2. TOF for fodderA 1989–1990 survey <strong>in</strong> Bamako, Malifound that home-reared sheep were fed1.8 kg <strong>of</strong> Pterocarpus er<strong>in</strong>aceus andKhaya senegalensis leaves each day,and over 1400 t <strong>of</strong> fresh Pterocarpuser<strong>in</strong>aceus leaves were sold <strong>in</strong> Bamakodaily as feed for small rum<strong>in</strong>ants. In SriLanka, leaves <strong>of</strong> Gliricidia sepium area popular fodder for goats and sheep.Fodder products from trees providecarbohydrates, nitrogen, magnesium,potassium and oligo-elements.
Chapter 21: Trees outside forests 171and Acacia senegal is a good illustration <strong>of</strong>a traditional tree-based farm<strong>in</strong>g system thathelps to restore soil fertility and structure.Environmental services and socioculturalvaluesTOF improve air quality and the microclimate,particularly <strong>in</strong> urban areas. Treesare a valuable carbon ‘s<strong>in</strong>k’ (<strong>World</strong> Bank2002) and help to reduce soil erosion bycheck<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>d velocity and water run<strong>of</strong>f.<strong>The</strong>y are highly valued by many communitiesliv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> hot climates as providers <strong>of</strong>shade and have significant symbolic, social,religious and cultural status. <strong>The</strong>y alsoprovide many other environmental bene<strong>fit</strong>sand services, such as m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the loss<strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>eral elements through leach<strong>in</strong>g andimprov<strong>in</strong>g soil structure.<strong>The</strong> way forwardIt is generally agreed that <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g agriculturalproductivity is central to growthand poverty alleviation <strong>in</strong> rural areas. It isalso well understood that <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g production<strong>of</strong>ten results <strong>in</strong> the destruction <strong>of</strong>forest cover, depletion <strong>of</strong> fertile soil andsevere land degradation.At national and <strong>in</strong>ternational levels, theimportance <strong>of</strong> TOF as a resource is <strong>of</strong>tenoverlooked. Only limited <strong>in</strong>itiatives existedprior to the Kotka meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1993. S<strong>in</strong>cethen, many case studies conducted at nationaland regional levels have identifiedthe serious livelihood <strong>challenge</strong>s faced bysmallholder farmers. To be effective, treeissues need to be addressed <strong>in</strong> a holistic,people-centred vision, focus<strong>in</strong>g on themultiple functions <strong>of</strong> trees.Population pressure on land andforest resourcesIncreas<strong>in</strong>g population pressure on limitedagricultural land has led to the breakdown<strong>of</strong> many traditional tree-based systems.<strong>The</strong> result has been dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g vegetationcover, soil erosion and reduced agriculturalproduction. One <strong>of</strong> the greatest <strong>challenge</strong>sis that <strong>of</strong> prevent<strong>in</strong>g further erosion <strong>of</strong> forestcover. Promot<strong>in</strong>g TOF systems with<strong>in</strong>the context <strong>of</strong> land conservation and restorationis one <strong>of</strong> the most effective ways toimprove productivity <strong>of</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g agriculturalland area, thereby limit<strong>in</strong>g pressureon rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forest resources.Appropriate policy to meet localdevelopment needsMillions <strong>of</strong> vulnerable people liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> ruraland peri-urban areas rely heavily on treeresources for their livelihoods, but they lackan effective voice <strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g. Anurgent <strong>challenge</strong> is that <strong>of</strong> extend<strong>in</strong>g smallholders’rights <strong>in</strong> order to give TOF moreprom<strong>in</strong>ence as a route towards more susta<strong>in</strong>ablelivelihoods. Farmers will plant moretrees when they are given policy and market<strong>in</strong>centives. Formal acknowledgement <strong>of</strong> userrights over trees grow<strong>in</strong>g on farmland wouldprovide a major <strong>in</strong>centive for the conservation<strong>of</strong> such trees. On-farm tree managementgenerally makes good economic sensewhen bene<strong>fit</strong>s are taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> a‘whole farm’ evaluation approach.<strong>The</strong> best solution would be to <strong>in</strong>tegrate TOF<strong>in</strong>to national agriculture and forestry developmentplans, by focus<strong>in</strong>g on the needs <strong>of</strong>local people to create their own woodlots,protect their environment and improve theirlivelihoods. In order to conv<strong>in</strong>ce the governmentaldecision-makers and planners to<strong>in</strong>clude TOF <strong>in</strong> their national policies andtree plant<strong>in</strong>g programmes, however, it is essentialto demonstrate the bene<strong>fit</strong>s <strong>of</strong> trees <strong>in</strong>the national economy.Farmers will need to be supported with appropriatelegal measures, market <strong>in</strong>centivesand the removal <strong>of</strong> barriers to land accessand tree tenure. National forestry lawsseldom favour small-scale on-farm treeplant<strong>in</strong>g and private <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> forestryis <strong>of</strong>ten limited by rigid land tenure systemsand restrictions (FAO 1993). Legal changesto land and tree tenure are critical for TOFpromotion because they secure bene<strong>fit</strong>s forthe stakeholders.We believe that a bold approach, that givesstakeholders a voice and the right to decidewhat is necessary, should be the focus <strong>of</strong>any policy target<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able development.This requires simultaneous action,however, such as multiple-scale activitiesand careful consideration <strong>of</strong> how socialand political changes <strong>in</strong>fluence the success<strong>of</strong> different <strong>in</strong>terventions and managementpractices.Build<strong>in</strong>g knowledge and capacities<strong>The</strong> past two decades have witnessedthe development <strong>of</strong> techniques to designlandscape mosaics based on tree-crop<strong>in</strong>tegration and environmental protection.However, results <strong>of</strong> many recent case studies,meet<strong>in</strong>gs and workshops (FAO 2001a;FAO 2002) highlight the need for furthertechnologies and research to enhance theproper use <strong>of</strong> trees <strong>in</strong> landscape restorationand for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g environmentaland economic viability. In addition, as apriority action, there is a need to evaluatetraditional knowledge and practices for treemanagement. A comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> naturalresource management approaches is likelyto be required.Gender-differentiated managementWomen are the first to be concerned withthe selection and harvest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> non-woodforest products (leaves, roots, fruits, etc.)and have good overall knowledge <strong>of</strong> theiruse, conservation and process<strong>in</strong>g. A study<strong>in</strong> Java showed that 60 percent <strong>of</strong> a ruralfamily’s food typically comes from home-
- Page 4 and 5:
CitationGarrity, D., A. Okono, M. G
- Page 6 and 7:
Enhancing Environmental ServicesCha
- Page 8 and 9:
viWorld Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 10 and 11:
viiiWorld Agroforestry into the Fut
- Page 13 and 14:
Agroforestry and the Future
- Page 15 and 16:
Keywords:Millennium Development Goa
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 21 and 22:
Trees and Markets
- Page 23 and 24:
Keywords:Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 35 and 36:
Keywords:Perennial tree crops, plan
- Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 43 and 44:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 47:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 50 and 51:
38World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 52 and 53:
40World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 54 and 55:
“Trees influence landscape scaled
- Page 56 and 57:
44World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 58 and 59:
46World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 60 and 61:
48World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 62 and 63:
50World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 65 and 66:
Keywords:Agroforestry, improved fal
- Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 73 and 74:
Keywords:Extension, farmer-centred
- Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 83 and 84:
Keywords:Policy, land management, a
- Page 85 and 86:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 87 and 88:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 91 and 92:
Chapter 9Land and People:Working Gr
- Page 93:
Chapter 9: Land and people81• sca
- Page 96 and 97:
“Forest conservation is no longer
- Page 98 and 99:
86World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 100 and 101:
88World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 102 and 103:
90World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 104 and 105:
92World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 106 and 107:
94World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 108 and 109:
96World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 110 and 111:
98World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 112 and 113:
100World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 115 and 116:
Keywords:Agroforestry, buffering wa
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 125 and 126:
Keywords:Agroforestry, vulnerabilit
- Page 127 and 128:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 129 and 130:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 133: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 136 and 137: 124World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 138 and 139: 126World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 140 and 141: “Agroforestry can and does playa
- Page 142 and 143: 130World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 144 and 145: 132World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 147 and 148: Keywords:Educational impact, sustai
- Page 149 and 150: Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 151 and 152: Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 153 and 154: Keywords:Networking, research-exten
- Page 155 and 156: Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 159 and 160: Keywords:Capacity building, agrofor
- Page 161 and 162: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 163 and 164: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 165 and 166: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 167 and 168: Keywords:E-learning, agricultural e
- Page 169 and 170: Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 171 and 172: Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 173 and 174: Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 175 and 176: Chapter 20Strengthening Institution
- Page 177: Chapter 20: Strengthening instituti
- Page 180 and 181: 168“The biological characteristic
- Page 184 and 185: 172World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 186 and 187: 174World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 188 and 189: 176World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 190 and 191: 178World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 192 and 193: 180World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 194 and 195: 182World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 196 and 197: 184World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 198 and 199: 186World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 200 and 201: 188World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 202 and 203: 190World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 205 and 206: Author ContactsFahmudin Agusisri@in
- Page 207 and 208: Acronyms and AbbreviationsACIARAFTP
- Page 210: CreditsFront cover photo: Karen Rob
- Page 213: World Agroforestry into the Future