186<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the Future(Sitoe 2004; Kayambaz<strong>in</strong>thu et al. 2005).Encourag<strong>in</strong>g village forest committees andextension <strong>of</strong>ficers to <strong>in</strong>corporate medic<strong>in</strong>alspecies <strong>in</strong>to their management plans couldcontribute to susta<strong>in</strong>able management <strong>of</strong>wild species. <strong>The</strong>re is also potential for thedomestication <strong>of</strong> medic<strong>in</strong>al plants.New sources <strong>of</strong> medic<strong>in</strong>es from plantscont<strong>in</strong>ue to be discovered. For example,researchers at the University <strong>of</strong> Lausannehave found that the African tree Bobgunnuamadascarienis conta<strong>in</strong>s an anti-fungal substancethat combats Candida albicans, thebacteria responsible for fungal sk<strong>in</strong> problems,and mycosis, a condition that commonlyaffects the eyes <strong>of</strong> <strong>AIDS</strong> patients. Itis also said to fight Aspergillis, a fungus thatcan cause fatal lung disease (SAF 2004).Income generationTrees provide many products (food, fuel,fibre, timber, poles and fodder) that householdscan use or sell. Livelihoods can alsobe supported by sale <strong>of</strong> woodland productssuch as honey and mushrooms. An NGO<strong>in</strong> Malawi has encouraged young womento make and sell charcoal briquettes <strong>in</strong>stead<strong>of</strong> engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> commercial sex fortheir <strong>in</strong>come (Ngwira et al. 2001).Safety net resourcesForest foods have traditionally complementedagriculture and <strong>of</strong>ten susta<strong>in</strong>people dur<strong>in</strong>g severe food shortages(Shackleton et al. 2001). <strong>The</strong> ‘miombo’woodlands <strong>of</strong> southern Africa provide sucha traditional ‘safety net’ and they occurthroughout the area most affected by <strong>HIV</strong>/<strong>AIDS</strong>. Despite the mediocre fertility <strong>of</strong> thesoils, the vegetation provides a wide range<strong>of</strong> products <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g foods, medic<strong>in</strong>alplants, firewood and timber. Studies havefound that <strong>in</strong>digenous fruit can be a significantsource <strong>of</strong> food and cash <strong>in</strong>come,especially for poorer households, womenBox 1. Rotational woodlots providefood and cashIn the tobacco-grow<strong>in</strong>g Tabora region<strong>of</strong> Tanzania, farmers have traditionallyharvested wood from natural ‘miombo’woodlands to make poles for dry<strong>in</strong>g thetobacco leaves. To protect these woodlandsand create an alternative source <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>come, the Centre and its partners havedeveloped a rotational woodlot system,where farmers plant fast-grow<strong>in</strong>gacacia (primarily Acacia crassicarpa) <strong>in</strong>1-ha plots. <strong>The</strong>y cont<strong>in</strong>ue to grow maize<strong>in</strong> the same plots for the first two years,then wait until the fifth year to harvestthe wood. Compared to the customarymaize/fallow system, rotational woodlotsrequired about 2.5 times as muchlabour, mostly needed to harvest thewood <strong>in</strong> the fifth year. Despite the highlabour cost and longer payback period,the net current value <strong>of</strong> rotational woodlotswas over six times that <strong>of</strong> maizealone and the return to labour from rotationalwoodlots was more than twicethat <strong>of</strong> maize. Many farmers are nowadopt<strong>in</strong>g the system (Ramadhani et al.2002). While loss <strong>of</strong> family membersdue to <strong>HIV</strong>/<strong>AIDS</strong> may create long-termlabour shortages, it appears that extralabour can usually be hired for harvest<strong>in</strong>gthe wood.and children. In the communal areas <strong>of</strong>Zimbabwe, for example, Cavendish (2000)found that the poorest 20 percent <strong>of</strong> householdsgenerated 7–9 percent <strong>of</strong> their totalhousehold <strong>in</strong>come from sell<strong>in</strong>g collectedwild foods. At two sites <strong>in</strong> rural Zimbabwe,Mithhoefer and Waibel (2003) foundthat virtually all households consumedsome <strong>in</strong>digenous fruits (Uapaca kirkiana,Strychnos sp., Par<strong>in</strong>ari curatellifolia) andthat 7–20 percent <strong>of</strong> households sold someUapaca kirkiana. When food is plentiful,it is mostly the children who eat the fruits.However, <strong>in</strong> times <strong>of</strong> food scarcity, Uapacakirkiana, Strychnos sp. and Par<strong>in</strong>ari curatellifoliabecame the ma<strong>in</strong> food for over 70percent <strong>of</strong> households at one <strong>of</strong> the studysites. In total, the three <strong>in</strong>digenous fruitcontributed 5–7 percent <strong>of</strong> total household<strong>in</strong>come. Returns to family labour <strong>in</strong>vested<strong>in</strong> gather<strong>in</strong>g, process<strong>in</strong>g and sell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>digenousfruit <strong>in</strong> both villages were found tobe higher than returns to crops, livestock,horticulture, exotic fruit trees and casuallabour.Mark<strong>in</strong>g ownershipIn many sub-Saharan African social systems,when a man dies, his relatives take overall productive assets (and sometimes otherproperty) from the widow. In some cultures,the widow, land, property and children are‘<strong>in</strong>herited’ by a brother <strong>of</strong> the deceased.With the spread <strong>of</strong> <strong>AIDS</strong>, and worries thatthey may be ‘<strong>in</strong>herit<strong>in</strong>g’ <strong>in</strong>fected people,families <strong>of</strong> deceased heads <strong>of</strong> householdsmay refuse to care for the widow andchildren, yet still claim the land that theirbrother had farmed. Widows are then leftwith no productive assets (Drimie 2002).Access to and ownership <strong>of</strong> land can havean important <strong>in</strong>fluence on the viability <strong>of</strong><strong>HIV</strong>/<strong>AIDS</strong>-affected households. Trees havelong been an <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> tenure <strong>in</strong> Africa.<strong>The</strong>re is some prospect that plant<strong>in</strong>g trees <strong>in</strong>abandoned fields can preserve the land forthe family and, at the same time, rehabilitatewasted soils and provide fuelwood, fodderand fruits. On the other hand, <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>trees could also encourage more powerfulfamily members to take over that portion <strong>of</strong>land. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> customary practicewith regard to land and tree tenure willvary between adjacent communities shar<strong>in</strong>gthe same cultural heritage. More evidence
Chapter 23: <strong>The</strong> <strong>challenge</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong>/<strong>AIDS</strong>187needs to be compiled on how aspects <strong>of</strong>land and tree ownership can assist peoplesuffer<strong>in</strong>g from the effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong>/<strong>AIDS</strong>.Labour managementMost African agriculture depends on manuallabour and there are peaks <strong>in</strong> labourdemand, for example, for land preparation,plant<strong>in</strong>g and harvest<strong>in</strong>g. When sickness,death and funerals occur dur<strong>in</strong>g thesecritical periods, crop productivity will begreatly affected. Car<strong>in</strong>g for the sick alsodemands time and energy and reducesavailability <strong>of</strong> labour, especially women’s,for agricultural tasks. In Ethiopia, a studyfound that <strong>AIDS</strong>-affected households spent50–66 percent less time on agriculture thanhouseholds that were not affected (Baryoh2000). In Tanzania, researchers found thatwomen spent 60 percent less time on agriculturalactivities when their husbandswere ill (Tibaijuka 1997).Different improved fallows agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systemsadvocated by the Centre have differentimplications for total and seasonal labourdemand. Short-duration improved fallows,as developed <strong>in</strong> western Kenya, require lesstotal labour than the typical two-seasonpattern <strong>of</strong> maize production, but there isa greater seasonal labour demand dur<strong>in</strong>gthe land preparation phase <strong>of</strong> the long ra<strong>in</strong>production season. If labour hir<strong>in</strong>g is not aviable option, then shortage <strong>of</strong> labour mayimpede adoption (Rommelse 2001). <strong>The</strong> 2–3-year fallows developed <strong>in</strong> eastern Zambiatypically entail less labour per hectare andper unit output than the cont<strong>in</strong>uous maizesystems (no fertilizer) that they replace. Dur<strong>in</strong>gthe first year <strong>of</strong> tree establishment, thefallows do require extra labour, but thereis quite a wide variation between differentfallow systems. Steve Franzel, ICRAF (personalcommunication) used farm data fromeastern Zambia to calculate the extra labourtime required to establish 0.27 ha plots <strong>of</strong>Sesbania sesban and Tephrosia vogelii fallows.S<strong>in</strong>ce the average farm <strong>in</strong> this regionhas 1.08 ha <strong>of</strong> cultivated land, plant<strong>in</strong>g 0.27ha to improved fallow each year for 4 yearswould allow most farmers to convert theirfarms to the agr<strong>of</strong>orestry system with<strong>in</strong> 4years. <strong>The</strong> calculations showed that purestands <strong>of</strong> S. sesban and T. vogelii require anaverage <strong>of</strong> 36 and 22 extra labour days dur<strong>in</strong>gthe establishment year. If, however, thefallows are <strong>in</strong>tercropped with maize dur<strong>in</strong>gthe first year, then only an extra 16 daysfor S. sesban and 3 days for T.vogelii arerequired. Different systems are therefore appropriatefor households at different stages<strong>of</strong> <strong>AIDS</strong> impact. Households that have alreadysuffered significant labour losses maynot be well advised to plant pure stands<strong>of</strong> S. sesban, but they could still managethe extra labour required to <strong>in</strong>tercrop theirmaize with T. vogelii.Reduc<strong>in</strong>g labour peaksA study <strong>in</strong> eastern Zambia showed that landpreparation, weed<strong>in</strong>g and harvest<strong>in</strong>g accountfor 70 percent <strong>of</strong> the labour demandassociated with the production <strong>of</strong> maize(29%)(18%)under improved fallows (Ajayi 2003: seeFigure 4). Land preparation and weed<strong>in</strong>g arethe most demand<strong>in</strong>g, s<strong>in</strong>ce several essentialactivities have to be carried out over arelatively short time. Any <strong>in</strong>terventions thatreduce labour requirements dur<strong>in</strong>g thesephases will therefore be attractive.Further analysis showed that <strong>in</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestryfields, farmers spent 27 percent <strong>of</strong> total labouron land preparation compared to 19percent <strong>in</strong> non-agr<strong>of</strong>orestry fields (Table 2).However, <strong>in</strong> the non-agr<strong>of</strong>orestry fields,farmers spent 34 percent <strong>of</strong> their labourtime on weed<strong>in</strong>g activities compared to26 percent <strong>in</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry fields. Weed<strong>in</strong>gis time-consum<strong>in</strong>g and must be completedwith<strong>in</strong> a short time to prevent a poor harvest.Thus, by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the proportion <strong>of</strong>time allocated to weed<strong>in</strong>g from 34 to 26percent, improved fallows help labourconstra<strong>in</strong>edhouseholds to have a betterchance <strong>of</strong> a good yield. However, fallowsentail more labour for land preparation.<strong>The</strong> trade-<strong>of</strong>f is <strong>in</strong> favour <strong>of</strong> fallows becausethe time ‘w<strong>in</strong>dow’ for land preparation isless critical than that for weed<strong>in</strong>g.Figure 4. Distribution <strong>of</strong> total labour <strong>in</strong>puts by type <strong>of</strong> field operation (% <strong>of</strong> absolute <strong>in</strong>puts).Source: Ajayi (2003).(2%) (2%)(3%)(8%)(3%)(23%)(12%)TransportationNursery operationsLand preparationRe-ridg<strong>in</strong>gAgr<strong>of</strong>orestry plant<strong>in</strong>gMaize plant<strong>in</strong>gFertilizer applicationWeed<strong>in</strong>gHarvest<strong>in</strong>g
- Page 4 and 5:
CitationGarrity, D., A. Okono, M. G
- Page 6 and 7:
Enhancing Environmental ServicesCha
- Page 8 and 9:
viWorld Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 10 and 11:
viiiWorld Agroforestry into the Fut
- Page 13 and 14:
Agroforestry and the Future
- Page 15 and 16:
Keywords:Millennium Development Goa
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 21 and 22:
Trees and Markets
- Page 23 and 24:
Keywords:Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 35 and 36:
Keywords:Perennial tree crops, plan
- Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 43 and 44:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 47:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 50 and 51:
38World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 52 and 53:
40World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 54 and 55:
“Trees influence landscape scaled
- Page 56 and 57:
44World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 58 and 59:
46World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 60 and 61:
48World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 62 and 63:
50World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 65 and 66:
Keywords:Agroforestry, improved fal
- Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 73 and 74:
Keywords:Extension, farmer-centred
- Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 83 and 84:
Keywords:Policy, land management, a
- Page 85 and 86:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 87 and 88:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 91 and 92:
Chapter 9Land and People:Working Gr
- Page 93:
Chapter 9: Land and people81• sca
- Page 96 and 97:
“Forest conservation is no longer
- Page 98 and 99:
86World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 100 and 101:
88World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 102 and 103:
90World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 104 and 105:
92World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 106 and 107:
94World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 108 and 109:
96World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 110 and 111:
98World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 112 and 113:
100World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 115 and 116:
Keywords:Agroforestry, buffering wa
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 125 and 126:
Keywords:Agroforestry, vulnerabilit
- Page 127 and 128:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 129 and 130:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 133:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 136 and 137:
124World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 138 and 139:
126World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 140 and 141:
“Agroforestry can and does playa
- Page 142 and 143:
130World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 144 and 145:
132World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 147 and 148: Keywords:Educational impact, sustai
- Page 149 and 150: Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 151 and 152: Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 153 and 154: Keywords:Networking, research-exten
- Page 155 and 156: Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 159 and 160: Keywords:Capacity building, agrofor
- Page 161 and 162: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 163 and 164: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 165 and 166: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 167 and 168: Keywords:E-learning, agricultural e
- Page 169 and 170: Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 171 and 172: Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 173 and 174: Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 175 and 176: Chapter 20Strengthening Institution
- Page 177: Chapter 20: Strengthening instituti
- Page 180 and 181: 168“The biological characteristic
- Page 182 and 183: 170World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 184 and 185: 172World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 186 and 187: 174World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 188 and 189: 176World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 190 and 191: 178World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 192 and 193: 180World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 194 and 195: 182World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 196 and 197: 184World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 200 and 201: 188World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 202 and 203: 190World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 205 and 206: Author ContactsFahmudin Agusisri@in
- Page 207 and 208: Acronyms and AbbreviationsACIARAFTP
- Page 210: CreditsFront cover photo: Karen Rob
- Page 213: World Agroforestry into the Future