13.07.2015 Views

The challenge of HIV/AIDS: Where does agroforestry fit in? - World ...

The challenge of HIV/AIDS: Where does agroforestry fit in? - World ...

The challenge of HIV/AIDS: Where does agroforestry fit in? - World ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 23: <strong>The</strong> <strong>challenge</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong>/<strong>AIDS</strong>187needs to be compiled on how aspects <strong>of</strong>land and tree ownership can assist peoplesuffer<strong>in</strong>g from the effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong>/<strong>AIDS</strong>.Labour managementMost African agriculture depends on manuallabour and there are peaks <strong>in</strong> labourdemand, for example, for land preparation,plant<strong>in</strong>g and harvest<strong>in</strong>g. When sickness,death and funerals occur dur<strong>in</strong>g thesecritical periods, crop productivity will begreatly affected. Car<strong>in</strong>g for the sick alsodemands time and energy and reducesavailability <strong>of</strong> labour, especially women’s,for agricultural tasks. In Ethiopia, a studyfound that <strong>AIDS</strong>-affected households spent50–66 percent less time on agriculture thanhouseholds that were not affected (Baryoh2000). In Tanzania, researchers found thatwomen spent 60 percent less time on agriculturalactivities when their husbandswere ill (Tibaijuka 1997).Different improved fallows agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systemsadvocated by the Centre have differentimplications for total and seasonal labourdemand. Short-duration improved fallows,as developed <strong>in</strong> western Kenya, require lesstotal labour than the typical two-seasonpattern <strong>of</strong> maize production, but there isa greater seasonal labour demand dur<strong>in</strong>gthe land preparation phase <strong>of</strong> the long ra<strong>in</strong>production season. If labour hir<strong>in</strong>g is not aviable option, then shortage <strong>of</strong> labour mayimpede adoption (Rommelse 2001). <strong>The</strong> 2–3-year fallows developed <strong>in</strong> eastern Zambiatypically entail less labour per hectare andper unit output than the cont<strong>in</strong>uous maizesystems (no fertilizer) that they replace. Dur<strong>in</strong>gthe first year <strong>of</strong> tree establishment, thefallows do require extra labour, but thereis quite a wide variation between differentfallow systems. Steve Franzel, ICRAF (personalcommunication) used farm data fromeastern Zambia to calculate the extra labourtime required to establish 0.27 ha plots <strong>of</strong>Sesbania sesban and Tephrosia vogelii fallows.S<strong>in</strong>ce the average farm <strong>in</strong> this regionhas 1.08 ha <strong>of</strong> cultivated land, plant<strong>in</strong>g 0.27ha to improved fallow each year for 4 yearswould allow most farmers to convert theirfarms to the agr<strong>of</strong>orestry system with<strong>in</strong> 4years. <strong>The</strong> calculations showed that purestands <strong>of</strong> S. sesban and T. vogelii require anaverage <strong>of</strong> 36 and 22 extra labour days dur<strong>in</strong>gthe establishment year. If, however, thefallows are <strong>in</strong>tercropped with maize dur<strong>in</strong>gthe first year, then only an extra 16 daysfor S. sesban and 3 days for T.vogelii arerequired. Different systems are therefore appropriatefor households at different stages<strong>of</strong> <strong>AIDS</strong> impact. Households that have alreadysuffered significant labour losses maynot be well advised to plant pure stands<strong>of</strong> S. sesban, but they could still managethe extra labour required to <strong>in</strong>tercrop theirmaize with T. vogelii.Reduc<strong>in</strong>g labour peaksA study <strong>in</strong> eastern Zambia showed that landpreparation, weed<strong>in</strong>g and harvest<strong>in</strong>g accountfor 70 percent <strong>of</strong> the labour demandassociated with the production <strong>of</strong> maize(29%)(18%)under improved fallows (Ajayi 2003: seeFigure 4). Land preparation and weed<strong>in</strong>g arethe most demand<strong>in</strong>g, s<strong>in</strong>ce several essentialactivities have to be carried out over arelatively short time. Any <strong>in</strong>terventions thatreduce labour requirements dur<strong>in</strong>g thesephases will therefore be attractive.Further analysis showed that <strong>in</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestryfields, farmers spent 27 percent <strong>of</strong> total labouron land preparation compared to 19percent <strong>in</strong> non-agr<strong>of</strong>orestry fields (Table 2).However, <strong>in</strong> the non-agr<strong>of</strong>orestry fields,farmers spent 34 percent <strong>of</strong> their labourtime on weed<strong>in</strong>g activities compared to26 percent <strong>in</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry fields. Weed<strong>in</strong>gis time-consum<strong>in</strong>g and must be completedwith<strong>in</strong> a short time to prevent a poor harvest.Thus, by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the proportion <strong>of</strong>time allocated to weed<strong>in</strong>g from 34 to 26percent, improved fallows help labourconstra<strong>in</strong>edhouseholds to have a betterchance <strong>of</strong> a good yield. However, fallowsentail more labour for land preparation.<strong>The</strong> trade-<strong>of</strong>f is <strong>in</strong> favour <strong>of</strong> fallows becausethe time ‘w<strong>in</strong>dow’ for land preparation isless critical than that for weed<strong>in</strong>g.Figure 4. Distribution <strong>of</strong> total labour <strong>in</strong>puts by type <strong>of</strong> field operation (% <strong>of</strong> absolute <strong>in</strong>puts).Source: Ajayi (2003).(2%) (2%)(3%)(8%)(3%)(23%)(12%)TransportationNursery operationsLand preparationRe-ridg<strong>in</strong>gAgr<strong>of</strong>orestry plant<strong>in</strong>gMaize plant<strong>in</strong>gFertilizer applicationWeed<strong>in</strong>gHarvest<strong>in</strong>g

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!