64<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the Future3. Natural vegetative strips (NVSs)and Landcare, the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<strong>The</strong> upland municipality <strong>of</strong> Claveria islocated <strong>in</strong> northern M<strong>in</strong>dañao, the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.Annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>of</strong> 2 200 mm allowsa farm<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>of</strong> two maize crops peryear. However, with this high ra<strong>in</strong>fall,coupled with cultivation <strong>of</strong> slop<strong>in</strong>g fieldsand use <strong>of</strong> animal tillage, soil loss througherosion had degraded lands and led todecl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g maize yields.Applied research began <strong>in</strong> 1985 oncontour hedgerow systems us<strong>in</strong>g nitrogenfix<strong>in</strong>gtrees to m<strong>in</strong>imize erosion, restoresoil fertility and improve crop productivity.But adoption <strong>of</strong> this system was slow, andmany hedgerows were abandoned ow<strong>in</strong>gto the high labour requirement to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>them, poor adaptation <strong>of</strong> legum<strong>in</strong>ous treesto acid soils, and competition between thetrees and the maize crop.Development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>novationThrough participatory on-farm experiments,ICRAF researchers concluded that theconcept <strong>of</strong> contour hedgerows rema<strong>in</strong>edpopular and that farmers were concernedabout soil erosion and loss <strong>of</strong> productivity.Researchers observed that farmers <strong>of</strong>tenploughed along contour l<strong>in</strong>es, leav<strong>in</strong>gcrop residues and/or natural vegetation <strong>in</strong>strips between ploughed fields. <strong>The</strong> latter<strong>in</strong>novation evolved <strong>in</strong>to natural vegetativestrips (NVSs) and emerged as a crucial entrypo<strong>in</strong>t for revers<strong>in</strong>g land degradation onslop<strong>in</strong>g fields.Over several years, the NVS technology,coupled with contour plough<strong>in</strong>g, spreadspontaneously among farmers. This <strong>in</strong>novativefarmer-based system and itscomponents were the subjects <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensiveon-farm research. Farmer <strong>in</strong>novations suchas the ‘cow’s back method’ (us<strong>in</strong>g the view<strong>of</strong> the ox’s backbone when plough<strong>in</strong>g toma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a reasonable trajectory for lay<strong>in</strong>gout contour l<strong>in</strong>es) were identified as acceptablealternatives to the more technical‘A-frame’ technique (ICRAF 1997). For thestrips, some farmers demonstrated <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong> such cash crops as fruit, timber andc<strong>of</strong>fee; others preferred improved foddergrasses and legumes. In all cases, these<strong>in</strong>novations built on and enriched thefoundation <strong>of</strong> the NVSs.Scal<strong>in</strong>g upWith the spontaneous visible spread <strong>of</strong>NVSs <strong>in</strong> and around ICRAF’s applied researchsites, considerable <strong>in</strong>terest emergedfrom communities, local and prov<strong>in</strong>cialgovernment agencies, and NGOs to learnmore about this <strong>in</strong>novation. In 1996, theCentre responded to communities’ requestsfor technical support and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>gand test<strong>in</strong>g the appropriateness <strong>of</strong>Landcare, a participatory, community-basedapproach from Australia <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the development<strong>of</strong> groups <strong>in</strong> partnership withlocal government to promote conservationfarm<strong>in</strong>gpractices (Campbell and Siepen1994; Catacutan et al. 2001; Mercado et al.2001). Farmers’ <strong>in</strong>terest led to the formation<strong>of</strong> the Claveria Landcare Association, whichhas emerged as the platform for widespreaddissem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> conservation farm<strong>in</strong>gbased on NVSs. In 1999, Landcare wasextended to another ICRAF research site<strong>in</strong> nearby Lantapan municipality, and by2002 there were an estimated 500 Landcaregroups, <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g more than 15 000farmers <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.Compar<strong>in</strong>g the key elements<strong>of</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g upFarmer-centred research andextensionParticipatory research, <strong>in</strong> which farmersplay a critical role <strong>in</strong> the design, implementation,and evaluation <strong>of</strong> research, hasbeen shown to improve the effectiveness <strong>of</strong>research and to reduce the time between<strong>in</strong>itial test<strong>in</strong>g and uptake (CGIAR/PRGA1999).Farmers were <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the early stages<strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> technologies at allthree sites. In both Kenya and Zambia,researcher-led and farmer-led trials wereconducted simultaneously: the formerprimarily to assess biophysical response,the latter for socioeconomic assessment(Franzel et al. 2001b). Encourag<strong>in</strong>g farmersto experiment with the new practicesas they wished led to new <strong>in</strong>novations andgreatly improved the practices at both sites– reduc<strong>in</strong>g costs, promot<strong>in</strong>g adoption andmak<strong>in</strong>g scal<strong>in</strong>g up more rapid.In the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, it was a farmer <strong>in</strong>novation– leav<strong>in</strong>g crop residues along the contour,where they revegetate form<strong>in</strong>g NVSs– that proved very popular. Researcherslater proved that these strips were effective<strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g soil erosion and required littlema<strong>in</strong>tenance. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> NVSs spreadrapidly and farmers cont<strong>in</strong>ued to <strong>in</strong>novate(Mercado et al. 2001). Also, establish<strong>in</strong>g along-term field presence <strong>in</strong> Claveria enabledresearchers to identify and validatefarmers’ <strong>in</strong>novations, such as the cow’sback method, and to help farmers adjustthe NVS system to better reflect their <strong>in</strong>terests,<strong>in</strong> particular by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g such cashgenerat<strong>in</strong>genterprises as timber and fruit.<strong>The</strong>re was some variation <strong>in</strong> extensionstrategies among the three case studies.In Kenya, extension facilitators providedtra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to government extension and NGOstaff and representatives <strong>of</strong> village-basedfarmer development groups, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>a significant amount <strong>of</strong> farmer-to-farmerextension. A similar strategy was implemented<strong>in</strong> eastern Zambia, except that
Chapter 7: Scal<strong>in</strong>g up the impact <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry65facilitators established a network <strong>of</strong> farmertra<strong>in</strong>ers.In the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, partnershipwith farmers <strong>in</strong> on-farm research paved theway for active farmer participation <strong>in</strong> thescal<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>of</strong> both the technical <strong>in</strong>novationsand the Landcare approach.Technical optionsOffer<strong>in</strong>g a range <strong>of</strong> options to farmersrather than a specific recommendation isimportant for several reasons (Franzel et al.2001c):• Diversification m<strong>in</strong>imizes productionand market risks, and allows for differentpreferences.• Farmers’ resources vary and differentoptions <strong>of</strong>ten have different resourcerequirements.• Different options allow for a variableenvironment.In all three sites, researchers and farmersquickly developed a range <strong>of</strong> options forthe technologies <strong>in</strong> question. In Kenya,farmers have the choice <strong>of</strong> three foddershrubs and a herbaceous legume, whichcan be planted <strong>in</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> differentniches and arrangements on their farms.Moreover, they can feed the leaves to theiranimals fresh or dry, or store them.In Zambia, farmers choose from four differentspecies and a range <strong>of</strong> management optionsfor their improved fallows, depend<strong>in</strong>gon their preferences and available labour.<strong>The</strong>y can plant the crops <strong>in</strong> pure stands or<strong>in</strong>tercropped.In the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the early 1990s,farmers and researchers began with a s<strong>in</strong>gle<strong>in</strong>novation – the NVS. But by the end<strong>of</strong> the decade, farmers had <strong>in</strong>troduced 31different perennials, on their own <strong>in</strong>itiativeor with advice from facilitators. <strong>The</strong>sedifferent options <strong>in</strong>cluded fruits, timbertrees, fodder grasses and legumes. Manyplanted with the <strong>in</strong>tention <strong>of</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>g cash(Mercado et al. 2001).Local <strong>in</strong>stitutional capacityEmpower<strong>in</strong>g local communities to plantheir own development and mobilize resourcesis fundamental to any successfuldevelopment strategy (B<strong>in</strong>swanger 2000).<strong>The</strong> three case studies used different approachesto build<strong>in</strong>g local <strong>in</strong>stitutionalcapacity. In central Kenya and easternZambia, extension facilitators providedtra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to village-based groups on thetechnologies they were promot<strong>in</strong>g, butthere were few direct efforts to otherwisebuild the capacities <strong>of</strong> these groups.In Eastern Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, Zambia, <strong>in</strong> the mid-1990s, ICRAF assisted partner organizationsto form an adaptive research anddissem<strong>in</strong>ation network to plan, implementand evaluate on-farm research, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g anddissem<strong>in</strong>ation activities. <strong>The</strong> network facilitatesthe <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong> local groups <strong>in</strong>the plans and activities <strong>of</strong> research and developmentorganizations, which enhancestheir capacity and feel<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong>the network and practices (Katanga et al.2002).In the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, Landcare has gonefurther <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g local <strong>in</strong>stitutional capacity.It has enabled communities to shareknowledge and experience, <strong>in</strong>fluence theagenda <strong>of</strong> researchers and local policymakers, and mobilize f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources.Mercado et al. (2001) noted that the “greatestsuccess <strong>of</strong> Landcare” was the change<strong>in</strong> the attitudes <strong>of</strong> farmers, policy makers,local government and landowners withrespect to land use and environmentalmanagement.Germplasm<strong>The</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> plant<strong>in</strong>g material is repeatedlyidentified as one <strong>of</strong> the most importantconstra<strong>in</strong>ts to the wider adoption <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<strong>in</strong>novations (Simons 1997). NationalTree Seed Centres have been unable to deliverseed to large numbers <strong>of</strong> smallholdersand, as with crop seed, “the seed demand–supply relationship <strong>in</strong> a large proportion<strong>of</strong> Africa’s smallholder farm<strong>in</strong>g systemsappears to represent a situation <strong>of</strong> marketfailure” (DeVries and Toenniessen 2001).Successful production and distribution <strong>of</strong>quality tree seed to resource-poor farmersdepends on a number <strong>of</strong> factors, some<strong>of</strong> which are biophysical, for example,identify<strong>in</strong>g adapted provenances and seedsources or ensur<strong>in</strong>g sufficient genetic variation,while other factors are economic,organizational and <strong>in</strong>stitutional, such asthe protection <strong>of</strong> and ownership <strong>of</strong> seedsources, and cost-efficient production anddistribution networks.<strong>The</strong> Kenyan calliandra case study shows atypical dilemma: farmers unfamiliar withthe new practice cannot be expected tobuy seed, yet provision <strong>of</strong> free seed discouragesthem from harvest<strong>in</strong>g it and underm<strong>in</strong>esthe emergence <strong>of</strong> private-sectormarket<strong>in</strong>g systems. ICRAF and KARI aretry<strong>in</strong>g to improve the situation <strong>in</strong> four ways:• Help<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>k dealers <strong>in</strong> western Kenyato buyers <strong>in</strong> other parts <strong>of</strong> Kenya.• Assist<strong>in</strong>g fodder shrub growers andprivate nurseries <strong>in</strong> central Kenya toproduce high-quality seed and seedl<strong>in</strong>gsand become seed dealers.• Work<strong>in</strong>g with an NGO, Farm Input ProvisionServices, to help private dealers topackage and sell seed through stockists.• Encourag<strong>in</strong>g private firms to producefodder shrub seed or to buy seed fromseed dealers.<strong>The</strong> situation <strong>of</strong> improved fallows <strong>in</strong>Zambia has many similarities. One solutiontried here through a USAID-f<strong>in</strong>anced
- Page 4 and 5:
CitationGarrity, D., A. Okono, M. G
- Page 6 and 7:
Enhancing Environmental ServicesCha
- Page 8 and 9:
viWorld Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 10 and 11:
viiiWorld Agroforestry into the Fut
- Page 13 and 14:
Agroforestry and the Future
- Page 15 and 16:
Keywords:Millennium Development Goa
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 21 and 22:
Trees and Markets
- Page 23 and 24:
Keywords:Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 35 and 36: Keywords:Perennial tree crops, plan
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 47: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 50 and 51: 38World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 52 and 53: 40World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 54 and 55: “Trees influence landscape scaled
- Page 56 and 57: 44World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 58 and 59: 46World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 60 and 61: 48World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 62 and 63: 50World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 65 and 66: Keywords:Agroforestry, improved fal
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 73 and 74: Keywords:Extension, farmer-centred
- Page 75: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 83 and 84: Keywords:Policy, land management, a
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 9Land and People:Working Gr
- Page 93: Chapter 9: Land and people81• sca
- Page 96 and 97: “Forest conservation is no longer
- Page 98 and 99: 86World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 100 and 101: 88World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 102 and 103: 90World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 104 and 105: 92World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 106 and 107: 94World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 108 and 109: 96World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 110 and 111: 98World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 112 and 113: 100World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 115 and 116: Keywords:Agroforestry, buffering wa
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 125 and 126: Keywords:Agroforestry, vulnerabilit
- Page 127 and 128:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 129 and 130:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 133:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 136 and 137:
124World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 138 and 139:
126World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 140 and 141:
“Agroforestry can and does playa
- Page 142 and 143:
130World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 144 and 145:
132World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 147 and 148:
Keywords:Educational impact, sustai
- Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 153 and 154:
Keywords:Networking, research-exten
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 159 and 160:
Keywords:Capacity building, agrofor
- Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 165 and 166:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 167 and 168:
Keywords:E-learning, agricultural e
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 20Strengthening Institution
- Page 177:
Chapter 20: Strengthening instituti
- Page 180 and 181:
168“The biological characteristic
- Page 182 and 183:
170World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 184 and 185:
172World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 186 and 187:
174World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 188 and 189:
176World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 190 and 191:
178World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 192 and 193:
180World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 194 and 195:
182World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 196 and 197:
184World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 198 and 199:
186World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 200 and 201:
188World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 202 and 203:
190World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 205 and 206:
Author ContactsFahmudin Agusisri@in
- Page 207 and 208:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsACIARAFTP
- Page 210:
CreditsFront cover photo: Karen Rob
- Page 213:
World Agroforestry into the Future