13.07.2015 Views

The challenge of HIV/AIDS: Where does agroforestry fit in? - World ...

The challenge of HIV/AIDS: Where does agroforestry fit in? - World ...

The challenge of HIV/AIDS: Where does agroforestry fit in? - World ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the Future3. Natural vegetative strips (NVSs)and Landcare, the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es<strong>The</strong> upland municipality <strong>of</strong> Claveria islocated <strong>in</strong> northern M<strong>in</strong>dañao, the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.Annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>of</strong> 2 200 mm allowsa farm<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>of</strong> two maize crops peryear. However, with this high ra<strong>in</strong>fall,coupled with cultivation <strong>of</strong> slop<strong>in</strong>g fieldsand use <strong>of</strong> animal tillage, soil loss througherosion had degraded lands and led todecl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g maize yields.Applied research began <strong>in</strong> 1985 oncontour hedgerow systems us<strong>in</strong>g nitrogenfix<strong>in</strong>gtrees to m<strong>in</strong>imize erosion, restoresoil fertility and improve crop productivity.But adoption <strong>of</strong> this system was slow, andmany hedgerows were abandoned ow<strong>in</strong>gto the high labour requirement to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>them, poor adaptation <strong>of</strong> legum<strong>in</strong>ous treesto acid soils, and competition between thetrees and the maize crop.Development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>novationThrough participatory on-farm experiments,ICRAF researchers concluded that theconcept <strong>of</strong> contour hedgerows rema<strong>in</strong>edpopular and that farmers were concernedabout soil erosion and loss <strong>of</strong> productivity.Researchers observed that farmers <strong>of</strong>tenploughed along contour l<strong>in</strong>es, leav<strong>in</strong>gcrop residues and/or natural vegetation <strong>in</strong>strips between ploughed fields. <strong>The</strong> latter<strong>in</strong>novation evolved <strong>in</strong>to natural vegetativestrips (NVSs) and emerged as a crucial entrypo<strong>in</strong>t for revers<strong>in</strong>g land degradation onslop<strong>in</strong>g fields.Over several years, the NVS technology,coupled with contour plough<strong>in</strong>g, spreadspontaneously among farmers. This <strong>in</strong>novativefarmer-based system and itscomponents were the subjects <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensiveon-farm research. Farmer <strong>in</strong>novations suchas the ‘cow’s back method’ (us<strong>in</strong>g the view<strong>of</strong> the ox’s backbone when plough<strong>in</strong>g toma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a reasonable trajectory for lay<strong>in</strong>gout contour l<strong>in</strong>es) were identified as acceptablealternatives to the more technical‘A-frame’ technique (ICRAF 1997). For thestrips, some farmers demonstrated <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong> such cash crops as fruit, timber andc<strong>of</strong>fee; others preferred improved foddergrasses and legumes. In all cases, these<strong>in</strong>novations built on and enriched thefoundation <strong>of</strong> the NVSs.Scal<strong>in</strong>g upWith the spontaneous visible spread <strong>of</strong>NVSs <strong>in</strong> and around ICRAF’s applied researchsites, considerable <strong>in</strong>terest emergedfrom communities, local and prov<strong>in</strong>cialgovernment agencies, and NGOs to learnmore about this <strong>in</strong>novation. In 1996, theCentre responded to communities’ requestsfor technical support and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>gand test<strong>in</strong>g the appropriateness <strong>of</strong>Landcare, a participatory, community-basedapproach from Australia <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the development<strong>of</strong> groups <strong>in</strong> partnership withlocal government to promote conservationfarm<strong>in</strong>gpractices (Campbell and Siepen1994; Catacutan et al. 2001; Mercado et al.2001). Farmers’ <strong>in</strong>terest led to the formation<strong>of</strong> the Claveria Landcare Association, whichhas emerged as the platform for widespreaddissem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> conservation farm<strong>in</strong>gbased on NVSs. In 1999, Landcare wasextended to another ICRAF research site<strong>in</strong> nearby Lantapan municipality, and by2002 there were an estimated 500 Landcaregroups, <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g more than 15 000farmers <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.Compar<strong>in</strong>g the key elements<strong>of</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g upFarmer-centred research andextensionParticipatory research, <strong>in</strong> which farmersplay a critical role <strong>in</strong> the design, implementation,and evaluation <strong>of</strong> research, hasbeen shown to improve the effectiveness <strong>of</strong>research and to reduce the time between<strong>in</strong>itial test<strong>in</strong>g and uptake (CGIAR/PRGA1999).Farmers were <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the early stages<strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> technologies at allthree sites. In both Kenya and Zambia,researcher-led and farmer-led trials wereconducted simultaneously: the formerprimarily to assess biophysical response,the latter for socioeconomic assessment(Franzel et al. 2001b). Encourag<strong>in</strong>g farmersto experiment with the new practicesas they wished led to new <strong>in</strong>novations andgreatly improved the practices at both sites– reduc<strong>in</strong>g costs, promot<strong>in</strong>g adoption andmak<strong>in</strong>g scal<strong>in</strong>g up more rapid.In the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, it was a farmer <strong>in</strong>novation– leav<strong>in</strong>g crop residues along the contour,where they revegetate form<strong>in</strong>g NVSs– that proved very popular. Researcherslater proved that these strips were effective<strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g soil erosion and required littlema<strong>in</strong>tenance. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> NVSs spreadrapidly and farmers cont<strong>in</strong>ued to <strong>in</strong>novate(Mercado et al. 2001). Also, establish<strong>in</strong>g along-term field presence <strong>in</strong> Claveria enabledresearchers to identify and validatefarmers’ <strong>in</strong>novations, such as the cow’sback method, and to help farmers adjustthe NVS system to better reflect their <strong>in</strong>terests,<strong>in</strong> particular by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g such cashgenerat<strong>in</strong>genterprises as timber and fruit.<strong>The</strong>re was some variation <strong>in</strong> extensionstrategies among the three case studies.In Kenya, extension facilitators providedtra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to government extension and NGOstaff and representatives <strong>of</strong> village-basedfarmer development groups, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>a significant amount <strong>of</strong> farmer-to-farmerextension. A similar strategy was implemented<strong>in</strong> eastern Zambia, except that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!