58<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the FutureCumulative maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield (t ha —1 )252015105baaaa0No P MPR MPR TSP TSP0 50 x 5 250 x 1 50 x 5 250 x 1P source and rateFigure 3. Cumulative maize yields over 5 years (five crops, ‘long ra<strong>in</strong>s’ cropp<strong>in</strong>g season only) <strong>in</strong> western Kenya. Nitrogen (N) andpotassium (K) were supplied. M<strong>in</strong>j<strong>in</strong>gu phosphate rock (MPR) or triple superphosphate (TSP) fertilizer were added, either once at 250 kgP ha –1 , or at a rate <strong>of</strong> 50 kg ha –1 each year for 5 years. <strong>The</strong>re was also a control plot with no added P.Source: Sanchez and Jama (2002).Conclusion and way forwardImproved fallows <strong>of</strong> legum<strong>in</strong>ous speciesand biomass transfer are both promis<strong>in</strong>gagr<strong>of</strong>orestry techniques that can contributeto <strong>in</strong>tegrated soil fertility managementpractices <strong>in</strong> smallholder farms. <strong>The</strong>y canalso provide other bene<strong>fit</strong>s such as control<strong>of</strong> pests and diseases, and <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong>improve fallows, provide fuelwood that is<strong>in</strong> short supply <strong>in</strong> many rural sett<strong>in</strong>gs. Toenhance the impact <strong>of</strong> these technologies,there are a few rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>challenge</strong>s thatneed to be addressed. <strong>The</strong>se <strong>in</strong>clude:1. Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the recommendation doma<strong>in</strong>s(geographic areas and householdtypes where the technologies are feasibleand pr<strong>of</strong>itable), someth<strong>in</strong>g that is necessarygiven the large biophysical and socioeconomicvariability that exists with<strong>in</strong> andbetween farms. 2. Develop<strong>in</strong>g strategies tomake fertilizers affordable, especially thoseconta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g P that organic produce cannotsupply adequately. 3. Promot<strong>in</strong>g widelysynergistic technologies such as biologicalsoil and water conservation measures.4. Promot<strong>in</strong>g the keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> livestock toproduce manure, and develop<strong>in</strong>g bestmanagement practices for its use. 5. Develop<strong>in</strong>gstrategies for wide-scale dissem<strong>in</strong>ation<strong>of</strong> the options available, particularlythose that deal with overcom<strong>in</strong>g the prevail<strong>in</strong>gconstra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> germplasm supplyand <strong>in</strong>formation on their use. 6. Assess<strong>in</strong>gecological bene<strong>fit</strong>s <strong>of</strong> fallow plant specieswhile mitigat<strong>in</strong>g potential problems <strong>of</strong>them becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vasive weeds. 7. Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gways <strong>in</strong> which high-value trees,crops and livestock can be more <strong>in</strong>tensivelyfarmed, provid<strong>in</strong>g a natural progressionout <strong>of</strong> poverty.ReferencesBarrios, E., F. Kwesiga, R.J. Buresh, and J.I.Sprent 1997. Light fraction soil organicmatter and available nitrogen follow<strong>in</strong>gtrees and maize. Soil Science Society <strong>of</strong>America Journal 61: 826−831.Barrios, E., F. Kwesiga, R.J. Buresh, J.I. Sprentand R. Coe 1998. Relat<strong>in</strong>g preseason soilnitrogen to maize yield <strong>in</strong> tree legumemaizerotations. Soil Science Society <strong>of</strong>America Journal 62: 1604–1609.Buresh, R.J., P.C. Smithson and D.T. Hellums1997. Build<strong>in</strong>g soil capital <strong>in</strong> Africa. Pp.111–149 <strong>in</strong>: Replenish<strong>in</strong>g Soil Fertility <strong>in</strong>Africa. American Society <strong>of</strong> Agronomyand Soil Science Society <strong>of</strong> America. SSSASpecial Publication No. 51.Buresh, R.J. and G. Tian 1997. Soil improvementby trees <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestrySystems 38: 51–76.
Chapter 6: Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>novations for soil fertility management <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa59Desaeger, J. and M.R. Rao 2000. Parasitic nematodepopulations <strong>in</strong> natural fallows andimproved cover crops and their effects onsubsequent crops <strong>in</strong> Kenya. Field CropsResearch 65: 41–56.Drechsel, P. and L.A. Gyiele 1999. <strong>The</strong> EconomicAssessment <strong>of</strong> Soil Nutrient Depletion:Analytical Issues for FrameworkDevelopment. International Board for SoilResearch and Management (IBSRAM),Bangkok, Thailand.Franzel, S. 1999. Socioeconomic factors affect<strong>in</strong>gthe adoption <strong>of</strong> potential improved tree fallows.Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Systems 47: 305–321.Gachengo, C.K. 1996. Phosphorus release andavailability on addition <strong>of</strong> organic materialsto phosphorus fix<strong>in</strong>g soils. MSc thesis,Forestry Department, Moi University, Eldoret,Kenya.Gacheru, E. and M.R. Rao 2001. Manag<strong>in</strong>gstriga <strong>in</strong>festation <strong>in</strong> maize us<strong>in</strong>g organicand <strong>in</strong>organic nutrient sources <strong>in</strong> westernKenya. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Pest Management47: 233–239.Gathumbi, S. 2000. Nitrogen sourc<strong>in</strong>g by fastgrow<strong>in</strong>glegumes <strong>in</strong> pure and mixed speciesfallows <strong>in</strong> western Kenya. PhD <strong>The</strong>sis,Wye College, Department <strong>of</strong> BiologicalSciences, University <strong>of</strong> London, UK.Hartem<strong>in</strong>k, A.E., R.J. Buresh, B. Jama and B.H.Janssen 1996. Soil nitrate and waterdynamics <strong>in</strong> sesbania fallows, weed fallowsand maize. Soil Science Society <strong>of</strong>America Journal 6: 568−574.ICRAF 1997. Annual report 1996. InternationalCentre for Research <strong>in</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry, Nairobi,Kenya.Jama, B.A., R.J. Buresh, J.K. Ndufa and K.D.Shepherd 1998a. Vertical distribution <strong>of</strong>roots and soil nitrate: Tree species andphosphorus effects. Soil Science Society<strong>of</strong> America Journal 62: 280−286.Jama, B.A., R.J. Buresh and F.M. Place 1998b.Sesbania tree fallows on phosphorus-deficient sites: Maize yield and f<strong>in</strong>ancialbene<strong>fit</strong>. Agronomy Journal 90: 717–726Jama, B.A., R.A. Sw<strong>in</strong>kels and R.J. Buresh 1997.Agronomic and economic evaluation <strong>of</strong>organic and <strong>in</strong>organic sources <strong>of</strong> phosphorus<strong>in</strong> western Kenya. Agronomy Journal89: 597−604.Jama, B.A., C.A. Palm, R.J. Buresh, A.I. Niang, C.Gachengo, G. Nziguheba and B. Amadalo2000. Tithonia diversifolia as a green manurefor soil fertility improvement <strong>in</strong> westernKenya: A review. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Systems49: 201–221.Kihanda, F.M. and M. Gichuru 1999. ManureManagement for Soil Fertility Improvement.Tropical Soil Biology and FertilityInstitute, Nairobi, Kenya.Kuntashula, E., P.L. Mafongoya, G. Sileshi and S.Lungu 2004. Potential <strong>of</strong> biomass transfer<strong>in</strong> susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g vegetable production <strong>in</strong> thedambos <strong>of</strong> eastern Zambia. ExperimentalAgriculture 40: 37–51.Kwesiga, F. and R. Coe 1994. <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> shortrotation Sesbania sesban fallows on maizeyield. Forest Ecology and Management64: 199–208.Kwesiga, F., F.K. Ak<strong>in</strong>nifesi, P.L. Mafongoya,M.H. McDermott and A. Agumya 2003.Africa research and development <strong>in</strong> thesouthern Africa region dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1990s:Review and <strong>challenge</strong>s ahead. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestrySystems 59: 173–186.Mekonnen, K., R.J. Buresh and B.A. Jama 1997.Root and <strong>in</strong>organic nitrogen distributions<strong>in</strong> sesbania fallow, natural fallowand maize fields. Plant and Soil 188:319–327.Niang, A., S. Gathumbi and B. Amadalo 1996a.<strong>The</strong> potential <strong>of</strong> short-duration improvedfallow for crop productivity enhancement<strong>in</strong> the highlands <strong>of</strong> western Kenya. Pp.218–230 <strong>in</strong>: J.O. Mugah (ed) People andInstitutional Participation <strong>in</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestryfor Susta<strong>in</strong>able Development. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<strong>of</strong> the First Kenya Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Conference.Kenya Forestry Research Institute,Nairobi, Kenya.Niang, A., S. Gathumbi, B. Amadalo and C.Obonyo 1996b. Maize yield response togreen manure application from selectedshrubs and tree species <strong>in</strong> western Kenya:A prelim<strong>in</strong>ary assessment. Pp. 350–358 <strong>in</strong>:J.O. Mugah (ed) People and InstitutionalParticipation <strong>in</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry for Susta<strong>in</strong>ableDevelopment. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the First KenyaAgr<strong>of</strong>orestry Conference. Kenya ForestryResearch Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.Nye P.H. and D.J. Greenland 1960. <strong>The</strong> soil undershift<strong>in</strong>g cultivation. Technical CommunicationNo. 51. Commonwealth Bureau<strong>of</strong> Soils, Harpenden, UK.Nziguheba, G., C.A. Palm, R.J. Buresh and P.C.Smithson 1998. Soil phosphorus fractionsand adsorption as affected by organic and<strong>in</strong>organic sources. Plant and Soil 198:159–168.Palm, C.A. 1995. Contribution <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestrytrees to nutrient requirements <strong>of</strong> plants.Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Systems 30: 105–124.Place, F. S. Franzel, J. de Wolf, R. Rommelse,F.R. Kwesiga, A.I. Niang and B.A. Jama2000. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry for soil fertilityreplenishment: Evidence on adoptionprocesses <strong>in</strong> Kenya and Zambia. Paperpresented at workshop: Understand<strong>in</strong>gAdoption Processes for Natural ResourceManagement Practices <strong>in</strong> sub-SaharanAfrica, 3–5 July 2000, at the <strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestryCentre, Nairobi, Kenya.Rao, M.R., A. Niang, A. Kwesiga, B. Duguma,S. Franzel, B. Jama and R.J. Buresh 1998.Soil fertility replenishment <strong>in</strong> sub-SaharanAfrica: New techniques and the spread<strong>of</strong> their use on farms. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Today10(2): 3−8.Sanchez, P.A. 1995. Science <strong>in</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry.Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Systems 30: 5–55.
- Page 4 and 5:
CitationGarrity, D., A. Okono, M. G
- Page 6 and 7:
Enhancing Environmental ServicesCha
- Page 8 and 9:
viWorld Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 10 and 11:
viiiWorld Agroforestry into the Fut
- Page 13 and 14:
Agroforestry and the Future
- Page 15 and 16:
Keywords:Millennium Development Goa
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 21 and 22: Trees and Markets
- Page 23 and 24: Keywords:Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 35 and 36: Keywords:Perennial tree crops, plan
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 47: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 50 and 51: 38World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 52 and 53: 40World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 54 and 55: “Trees influence landscape scaled
- Page 56 and 57: 44World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 58 and 59: 46World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 60 and 61: 48World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 62 and 63: 50World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 65 and 66: Keywords:Agroforestry, improved fal
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 69: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 73 and 74: Keywords:Extension, farmer-centred
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 83 and 84: Keywords:Policy, land management, a
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 9Land and People:Working Gr
- Page 93: Chapter 9: Land and people81• sca
- Page 96 and 97: “Forest conservation is no longer
- Page 98 and 99: 86World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 100 and 101: 88World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 102 and 103: 90World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 104 and 105: 92World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 106 and 107: 94World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 108 and 109: 96World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 110 and 111: 98World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 112 and 113: 100World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 115 and 116: Keywords:Agroforestry, buffering wa
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 125 and 126:
Keywords:Agroforestry, vulnerabilit
- Page 127 and 128:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 129 and 130:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 133:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 136 and 137:
124World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 138 and 139:
126World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 140 and 141:
“Agroforestry can and does playa
- Page 142 and 143:
130World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 144 and 145:
132World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 147 and 148:
Keywords:Educational impact, sustai
- Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 153 and 154:
Keywords:Networking, research-exten
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 159 and 160:
Keywords:Capacity building, agrofor
- Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 165 and 166:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 167 and 168:
Keywords:E-learning, agricultural e
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 20Strengthening Institution
- Page 177:
Chapter 20: Strengthening instituti
- Page 180 and 181:
168“The biological characteristic
- Page 182 and 183:
170World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 184 and 185:
172World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 186 and 187:
174World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 188 and 189:
176World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 190 and 191:
178World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 192 and 193:
180World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 194 and 195:
182World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 196 and 197:
184World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 198 and 199:
186World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 200 and 201:
188World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 202 and 203:
190World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 205 and 206:
Author ContactsFahmudin Agusisri@in
- Page 207 and 208:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsACIARAFTP
- Page 210:
CreditsFront cover photo: Karen Rob
- Page 213:
World Agroforestry into the Future