76<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the FutureUntil recently, national research programmestended to be organized aroundcommodity sectors, which hampered <strong>in</strong>tegratedresearch <strong>in</strong>to land managementissues. Now national research organizationsneed to attract funds to fulfil theirnew mandates <strong>in</strong> natural resources andland management research. <strong>The</strong> currentorthodoxy is that for such research to besuccessful, it should embrace the follow<strong>in</strong>gguidel<strong>in</strong>es: be demand-driven throughparticipatory research, be <strong>in</strong>terdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary<strong>in</strong> approach, be market-oriented, and help<strong>in</strong>tegrate technologies, <strong>in</strong>stitutions andpolicies. In do<strong>in</strong>g so it will be able to <strong>of</strong>ferfarm<strong>in</strong>g communities a range <strong>of</strong> landmanagement options that can overcomeconstra<strong>in</strong>ts and generate susta<strong>in</strong>able productivity<strong>in</strong>creases. Governments, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gthose <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, need tomake long-term commitments to researchfund<strong>in</strong>g, and must ensure that researchresults are better <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to nationalpolicies and programmes. <strong>The</strong> experiences<strong>of</strong> Brazil, Ch<strong>in</strong>a and India are a testamentto the extraord<strong>in</strong>ary achievements that canresult from mak<strong>in</strong>g strong commitments toresearch, and these impacts are be<strong>in</strong>g feltaround the world.Extension systems must become more flexible<strong>in</strong> their approaches; farmers are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glydemand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation on marketopportunities and process<strong>in</strong>g techniques <strong>in</strong>addition to their typical production questions.Agents or facilitators must have muchlarger <strong>in</strong>formation networks and must haveadequate resources to access the <strong>in</strong>formationand then transmit it to clients. Farmersalso demand different levels <strong>of</strong> service provision,from simple message transmissionto more susta<strong>in</strong>ed technical support. To improveland management, it is necessary topromote knowledge-<strong>in</strong>tensive practices suchas <strong>in</strong>tegrated nutrient management as wellas more simple transmission <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formationon output prices <strong>in</strong> different markets. Somesigns <strong>of</strong> this are occurr<strong>in</strong>g, for example,participatory rural appraisal is becom<strong>in</strong>gma<strong>in</strong>stream, but f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources are <strong>of</strong>tenthe b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g constra<strong>in</strong>ts. <strong>The</strong>re have alsobeen attempts to reduce national governments’share <strong>of</strong> costs and to move towards afee-for-service system, but the feasibility <strong>of</strong>this for poor smallholder farmers is a majorconcern. How to implement these concepts<strong>in</strong> practice has rema<strong>in</strong>ed elusive for themost part.<strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> research <strong>in</strong>shap<strong>in</strong>g land managementpolicy reformsContributions by ICRAF and itspartners <strong>in</strong> policy reform processesAlthough the Centre has not emphasizeda policy research programme, it has hadmodest success <strong>in</strong> contribut<strong>in</strong>g to positivepolicy change. One <strong>of</strong> the key policy areas<strong>in</strong> which the Centre has undertaken a significantamount <strong>of</strong> research is land and treetenure <strong>in</strong> Africa and Asia (Fay et al. 1998;Otsuka and Place 2001; Place 1995; Tomichet al. 1997; Traore and van Dorp 2004).This has helped to generate knowledge onthe effects <strong>of</strong> different tenure arrangementson NRM, and has led to several local tenurechanges <strong>in</strong> Africa, the development <strong>of</strong>a pilot tenure reform <strong>in</strong> Indonesia (Tomichet al. 1998), and the provision <strong>of</strong> technicaladvice to global tenure reform processes(e.g. presentations at <strong>World</strong> Bank and UN-Economic Commission for Africa workshopson tenure issues for Africa).ICRAF and its partners (national agriculturalresearch <strong>in</strong>stitutes and universities)have undertaken a large number <strong>of</strong> studiesrelated to understand<strong>in</strong>g farmers’ NRMdecision-mak<strong>in</strong>g processes and outcomes.This has also taken place throughout Africaand Asia and has helped to identify majorconstra<strong>in</strong>ts and opportunities on whichnew policies and programmes can bebased (Barrett et al. 2002). <strong>The</strong>se have beenpublished <strong>in</strong> several different media, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gpolicy briefs, and have found theirway <strong>in</strong>to some <strong>of</strong> the major development<strong>in</strong>itiatives from the United Nations MillenniumProject and the <strong>World</strong> Bank.Apart from policy research per se, the Centrehas <strong>in</strong>vested significant effort <strong>in</strong>to see<strong>in</strong>gthat its broader research results reachpolicy makers. <strong>The</strong> Centre has helpedto br<strong>in</strong>g the concept <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>toma<strong>in</strong>stream policy documents, researchprogrammes, extension services and developmentprojects. Examples <strong>in</strong>clude:the formation <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry research programmes<strong>in</strong> many African national research<strong>in</strong>stitutions, where previously they did notexist; the creation <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry curricula<strong>in</strong> more than a hundred universities andcolleges throughout the develop<strong>in</strong>g world;generation <strong>of</strong> national agr<strong>of</strong>orestry strategiesand networks <strong>in</strong> some countries; theexplicit mention <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gnumbers <strong>of</strong> global and national policydocuments; and contribution to specificmajor policy and programmatic <strong>in</strong>itiativessuch as the New Partnership for Africa’sDevelopment (NEPAD) agricultural strategy(NEPAD 2003), the <strong>World</strong> Bank’s SoilFertility Initiative and the UN’s Hunger TaskForce strategy to reduce hunger <strong>in</strong> Africa.Support<strong>in</strong>g future policy reforms<strong>The</strong>re are three major areas where researchfrom an <strong>in</strong>ternational organization such asthe Centre can best support policy debatesand reforms and improve smallholder landmanagement.1. Identification <strong>of</strong> land managementproblems and opportunities. This<strong>in</strong>volves the understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> how bio-
Chapter 8: Policies for improved land management <strong>in</strong> smallholder agriculture77physical problems <strong>of</strong> land degradationvary and how they <strong>in</strong>teract with poverty,policy and other drivers and <strong>in</strong>centives.Research work must therefore analysenot only land management problems butalso the underly<strong>in</strong>g policy and <strong>in</strong>centivestructures that shape land management.In essence, this research will identify priorityareas for <strong>in</strong>tervention based on thesignificance <strong>of</strong> problems and opportunitiesfor rehabilitation or enrichment. <strong>The</strong> Centreis well placed to do this s<strong>in</strong>ce it can drawupon research from a range <strong>of</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>gs.2. Design <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment/responsepriorities. Research should identify the<strong>in</strong>vestments – <strong>in</strong> technological, <strong>in</strong>stitutionaland policy reforms and programmes –that will lead to the greatest impact <strong>in</strong>susta<strong>in</strong>able land management for povertyreduction. Some <strong>of</strong> the crucial areas <strong>of</strong>research will be: synthesiz<strong>in</strong>g lessonslearned from around the world; analys<strong>in</strong>gtrade-<strong>of</strong>fs and synergies <strong>of</strong> different<strong>in</strong>terventions or sets <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terventions;identify<strong>in</strong>g entry po<strong>in</strong>ts or sequenc<strong>in</strong>gpatterns <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestments; and analys<strong>in</strong>galternative implementation strategies.It will be particularly important to assess<strong>in</strong>terventions comprehensively <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>their social, economic and environmentalimplications as well as implications atdifferent spatial and temporal scales.3. Monitor<strong>in</strong>g the impact <strong>of</strong> policyreforms. This will <strong>in</strong>volve collaborationwith policy makers <strong>in</strong> the pilot test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>land management policy and programmereforms and the monitor<strong>in</strong>g and assessment<strong>of</strong> these <strong>in</strong>terventions. Governments <strong>of</strong>develop<strong>in</strong>g countries are generally weak<strong>in</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g, while an <strong>in</strong>ternationalcentre is <strong>in</strong> a good position todevelop comparative studies <strong>of</strong> reformsand other <strong>in</strong>terventions across countries.Such studies will not only evaluate specific<strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> countries butshould also be able to understand thefactors associated with how successful an<strong>in</strong>tervention is, and to identify beneficialmodifications to reforms or <strong>in</strong>terventions.<strong>The</strong>se are very broad research areas; theCentre will need to focus on areas connectedto agr<strong>of</strong>orestry or, more broadly, tonatural resources <strong>in</strong> an agro-ecosystem.Build<strong>in</strong>g on strengths, the Centre shouldcont<strong>in</strong>ue to give emphasis to issues such as:germplasm supply; property rights (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights); communityand watershed management and regulation;the <strong>in</strong>teractions between poor communitiesand farmers on the one hand and landmanagement and degradation on the other,especially among the poor; research and extension;markets; commercialization; NRM;and the potential for promot<strong>in</strong>g environmentalservices and improved land management<strong>in</strong> smallholder communities.In order to have impact <strong>in</strong> these areas, theCentre will need to be active <strong>in</strong> two ways.Firstly, it should directly participate <strong>in</strong>research and advocacy activities <strong>in</strong> highpriorityareas where it may generate globalpublic goods. It will be most effectivewhen attempt<strong>in</strong>g to learn or dissem<strong>in</strong>atelessons across regions and countries, givenits global position. Secondly, the Centreshould be a champion for promot<strong>in</strong>g policyresearch and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation on issues thatare vital for improv<strong>in</strong>g land management.This will <strong>in</strong>volve public awareness, such asthe dissem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> technological successstories and presentations at key nationaland <strong>in</strong>ternational fora. It will also requirecapacity build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> research and advocacygroups so that they may <strong>in</strong>tegrate agr<strong>of</strong>orestryissues <strong>in</strong>to their own agendas. Clearly,the latter approach is go<strong>in</strong>g to be morecritical <strong>in</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g policy impact <strong>in</strong> a largenumber <strong>of</strong> countries so that more and moresmallholders might be able to bene<strong>fit</strong> fromimproved land management.ReferencesBarrett, C.B., F. Place and A. Abdillahi 2002.Natural Resources Management <strong>in</strong> AfricanAgriculture: Understand<strong>in</strong>g and Improv<strong>in</strong>gCurrent Practices. CAB International,Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, UK.De<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>ger, K. 2003. Land Policies for Growthand Poverty Reduction. <strong>World</strong> BankResearch Report. <strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> Bank,Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, USA and OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford, UK.Dorward, A., J. Kydd, J. Morrison and I. Urey2004. A policy agenda for pro-poor agriculturalgrowth. <strong>World</strong> Development32(1): 73–89.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization <strong>of</strong> theUnited Nations) 2004. FAOSTAT. (http://www.faostat.fao.org)Fay, C., H. de Foresta, M. Sirat and T.P. Tomich1998. A policy breakthrough for Indonesianfarmers <strong>in</strong> the Krui Damar agr<strong>of</strong>orests.Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Today 10: 25–26.Foster, M. and P. Mijumbi 2002. How, Whenand Why <strong>does</strong> Poverty get Budget Priority:Poverty Reduction Strategy and PublicExpenditure <strong>in</strong> Uganda. Overseas DevelopmentInstitute Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper 163,London, UK.Hazell, P. and M. Johnson 2002. End<strong>in</strong>g Hunger<strong>in</strong> Africa: Only the Small Farmer Can DoIt. International Food Policy Research Institute(IFPRI) Brief. www.IFPRI.org.Jayne, T., J. Govereh, M. Wanzala and M. Demeke2003. Fertilizer market development:a comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> Ethiopia,Kenya, and Zambia. Food Policy 28:293–316.
- Page 4 and 5:
CitationGarrity, D., A. Okono, M. G
- Page 6 and 7:
Enhancing Environmental ServicesCha
- Page 8 and 9:
viWorld Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 10 and 11:
viiiWorld Agroforestry into the Fut
- Page 13 and 14:
Agroforestry and the Future
- Page 15 and 16:
Keywords:Millennium Development Goa
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 21 and 22:
Trees and Markets
- Page 23 and 24:
Keywords:Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 35 and 36:
Keywords:Perennial tree crops, plan
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 47: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 50 and 51: 38World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 52 and 53: 40World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 54 and 55: “Trees influence landscape scaled
- Page 56 and 57: 44World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 58 and 59: 46World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 60 and 61: 48World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 62 and 63: 50World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 65 and 66: Keywords:Agroforestry, improved fal
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 73 and 74: Keywords:Extension, farmer-centred
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 83 and 84: Keywords:Policy, land management, a
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 87: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 9Land and People:Working Gr
- Page 93: Chapter 9: Land and people81• sca
- Page 96 and 97: “Forest conservation is no longer
- Page 98 and 99: 86World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 100 and 101: 88World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 102 and 103: 90World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 104 and 105: 92World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 106 and 107: 94World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 108 and 109: 96World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 110 and 111: 98World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 112 and 113: 100World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 115 and 116: Keywords:Agroforestry, buffering wa
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 125 and 126: Keywords:Agroforestry, vulnerabilit
- Page 127 and 128: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 129 and 130: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 133: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 136 and 137: 124World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 138 and 139:
126World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 140 and 141:
“Agroforestry can and does playa
- Page 142 and 143:
130World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 144 and 145:
132World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 147 and 148:
Keywords:Educational impact, sustai
- Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 153 and 154:
Keywords:Networking, research-exten
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 159 and 160:
Keywords:Capacity building, agrofor
- Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 165 and 166:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 167 and 168:
Keywords:E-learning, agricultural e
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 20Strengthening Institution
- Page 177:
Chapter 20: Strengthening instituti
- Page 180 and 181:
168“The biological characteristic
- Page 182 and 183:
170World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 184 and 185:
172World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 186 and 187:
174World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 188 and 189:
176World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 190 and 191:
178World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 192 and 193:
180World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 194 and 195:
182World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 196 and 197:
184World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 198 and 199:
186World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 200 and 201:
188World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 202 and 203:
190World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 205 and 206:
Author ContactsFahmudin Agusisri@in
- Page 207 and 208:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsACIARAFTP
- Page 210:
CreditsFront cover photo: Karen Rob
- Page 213:
World Agroforestry into the Future