13.07.2015 Views

The challenge of HIV/AIDS: Where does agroforestry fit in? - World ...

The challenge of HIV/AIDS: Where does agroforestry fit in? - World ...

The challenge of HIV/AIDS: Where does agroforestry fit in? - World ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the Futurefor 6–8 months. <strong>The</strong> wood can also be usedto support climb<strong>in</strong>g beans and other climb<strong>in</strong>gcrops.LimitationsTwo important factors that need to be consideredwith short-term improved fallowsystems are: how much leaf biomass thefallow species produces and the quantity<strong>of</strong> nutrients recycled with it. Several factors<strong>in</strong>fluence biomass production. In degradedsites (nutrient-depleted and eroded), mostfallow species grow poorly and producelittle biomass. This is also the case <strong>in</strong> dryareas and those with Vertisols (heavy clays)that dra<strong>in</strong> poorly dur<strong>in</strong>g the wet season.Such conditions prevail around the LakeVictoria bas<strong>in</strong> where leaf biomass yieldsare typically less than 1 t ha –1 . This willgive less than the 80–100 kg N ha –1 requiredto produce a 2 t ha –1 maize gra<strong>in</strong>yield (Palm 1995). <strong>The</strong>re are options thatcan be explored to <strong>in</strong>crease biomass yieldwithout necessarily <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the fallowperiod. <strong>The</strong>se <strong>in</strong>clude the use <strong>of</strong> coppic<strong>in</strong>gspecies, and under-sow<strong>in</strong>g the treefallow with herbaceous green manurelegumes such as mucuna (Mucuna puriens)and macroptilium (Macroptilium atropurpureum).In P-depleted soils, trees respondto P application and can bene<strong>fit</strong> from hav<strong>in</strong>gP applied to crops planted with<strong>in</strong> them(Jama et al. 1998b).<strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> pests and diseases is anotherimportant limitation and there aretwo aspects to this problem. Firstly, thereare pests and diseases that affect the treesthemselves and limit their productivity. Forexample, sesbania is damaged, sometimesseverely, by the defoliat<strong>in</strong>g beetle Mesoplatysochroptera. Crotalaria grahamiana,until now a promis<strong>in</strong>g species for improvedfallows <strong>in</strong> western Kenya, is attackedand defoliated severely by lepidopterousAmphicallia pactolicus caterpillars. Controll<strong>in</strong>gthese pests is vital to ensure thatthe productivity <strong>of</strong> species used and promotedfor improved fallows is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed.Secondly, there is need to understand andcontrol the effects <strong>of</strong> these pests on thecrops that succeed the fallows. A case <strong>in</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t are the root-knot nematodes associatedwith sesbania that also affect beansand tomatoes (Desaeger and Rao 2000).<strong>The</strong>re is also the potential for some <strong>of</strong> thespecies used <strong>in</strong> fallows to become <strong>in</strong>vasiveweeds – although no such occurrence hasbeen reported so far. Prolific seeders likecrotalaria and leucaena species are examples<strong>of</strong> the types <strong>of</strong> fallow plants most likely tobecome problematic. Other species may startto seed prolifically when taken out <strong>of</strong> theirecological range. Thus control mechanisms,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g prevention, early detection andrapid response, need to be developed. Thisrequires cross-regional collaborative efforts.Biomass (green manure)transferApart from improved fallows, exist<strong>in</strong>ghedges on farm borders are another source<strong>of</strong> organic nutrients for biomass transfer.More than 10 species with potential for thispurpose have been screened <strong>in</strong> westernKenya (Niang et al. 1996b), and the mostpromis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> all is Tithonia diversifolia <strong>of</strong>the family Asteraceae (tithonia). Althoughit is not a legume, the fresh leaf biomass<strong>of</strong> tithonia has levels <strong>of</strong> N as high as thosefound <strong>in</strong> many N-fix<strong>in</strong>g legumes. This commonshrub is also rich <strong>in</strong> P and K: the freshleaves conta<strong>in</strong> 3.5% N, 0.3% P and 3.8%K. <strong>The</strong> leaf biomass decomposes rapidlywith a half-life <strong>of</strong> about one week especiallydur<strong>in</strong>g the ra<strong>in</strong>y season (Gachengo1996).Many field studies report that the application<strong>of</strong> tithonia biomass results <strong>in</strong> highercrop yields than application <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>organicfertilizers, and it has longer residual effects(Gachengo 1996; Jama et al. 2000). Part <strong>of</strong>the yield bene<strong>fit</strong>s associated with tithoniacould be due to <strong>in</strong>creased availability <strong>of</strong>nutrients. Phosphorus release from tithoniafresh-leaf biomass is rapid, and the supply<strong>of</strong> plant-available P from tithonia can be atleast as effective as an equivalent amount<strong>of</strong> soluble fertilizer. Nziguheba et al. (1998)reported that <strong>in</strong>corporation <strong>of</strong> green tithoniabiomass equivalent to 5 t dry matter ha –1to an acid soil <strong>in</strong> western Kenya <strong>in</strong>creasedP <strong>in</strong> soil microbial biomass and reducedP sorption by soil (Table 1). In this study,the plots were kept free <strong>of</strong> weeds and notcropped <strong>in</strong> order to elim<strong>in</strong>ate plant uptake<strong>of</strong> P as a factor affect<strong>in</strong>g soil P fractions andprocesses. Increased P <strong>in</strong> soil microbial biomass2 weeks after tithonia <strong>in</strong>corporationpresumably <strong>in</strong>dicates enhanced biologicalcycl<strong>in</strong>g and turnover <strong>of</strong> P <strong>in</strong> labile pools<strong>of</strong> soil P. Enhanced microbial biomass Pfollow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> tithonia with triplesuperphosphate, and not with sole application<strong>of</strong> triple superphosphate, supports thehypothesis that tithonia <strong>in</strong>creases soil labileP. Soil microbial P before maize plant<strong>in</strong>ghas been shown by Buresh and Tian (1997)to be directly correlated to maize yield ona P-deficient soil <strong>in</strong> western Kenya.Availability <strong>of</strong> sufficient quantities <strong>of</strong> tithoniabiomass and the labour required toharvest and transport it to cropped fieldsare likely to be two major constra<strong>in</strong>ts tothe wide-scale adoption <strong>of</strong> this technologyby farmers. Recogniz<strong>in</strong>g these limitations,most farmers <strong>in</strong> western Kenya are us<strong>in</strong>gtithonia on small parcels <strong>of</strong> land and onhigh-value crops such as tomato and kale(Brassica oleraceae var acephala; ICRAF1997). <strong>The</strong>y are also experiment<strong>in</strong>g withtithonia <strong>in</strong> maize–bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)<strong>in</strong>tercrops, where it could be more f<strong>in</strong>anciallyattractive than <strong>in</strong> sole maize because

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!