74<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the FuturePolicy factors contribut<strong>in</strong>gto poor smallholder landmanagementIn this section, we explore <strong>in</strong> more detailsome <strong>of</strong> the policy problems related directlyto land management and neededreforms. This list is not exhaustive, but<strong>does</strong> reflect the priorities noted by severalother recent authors (Dorward et al. 2004;Hazell and Johnson 2002; Lee et al. 2001).We also recognize that <strong>in</strong> fact there havebeen positive reforms undertaken <strong>in</strong> manysectors that support smallholder agriculture<strong>in</strong> general and land management <strong>in</strong> particular,for example, policies with a focuson poverty, decentralization and new landlegislation.Enabl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>centives for theagricultural sectorIt goes without say<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong>centives providedto rural communities and agricultureare critical <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g improved landmanagement. Policy <strong>in</strong>centives can coversuch areas as market, pric<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>frastructureand credit. In some cases, even withgrow<strong>in</strong>g pressure on resources, gett<strong>in</strong>gthese policies right can lead to improvedland management (this has been thecase <strong>in</strong> Machakos, Kenya, for <strong>in</strong>stance).However, <strong>in</strong> many cases, merely putt<strong>in</strong>gwell-<strong>in</strong>tentioned broad policies <strong>in</strong> placeis not sufficient to ensure susta<strong>in</strong>able landmanagement, as witnessed by low nutrient<strong>in</strong>puts throughout much <strong>of</strong> Africa. Whileacknowledg<strong>in</strong>g the importance <strong>of</strong> theseenabl<strong>in</strong>g policies, we do not discuss them<strong>in</strong> detail, <strong>in</strong>stead devot<strong>in</strong>g more time tospecific land management policy issues.Readers may refer to the studies noted <strong>in</strong>the <strong>in</strong>troduction to this section for more<strong>in</strong>formation.Land tenure policy<strong>The</strong>re is no disagreement that propertyrights are important <strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>centivesfor <strong>in</strong>vestment, management, mortgag<strong>in</strong>gand transact<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> land (for <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong>soil management, see Prudencio 1993, andManyong and Houndekon 2000 for examples).<strong>The</strong>re is no property rights systemthat is ideal for all circumstances, but thereare many recognizable faults with someexist<strong>in</strong>g systems (see De<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>ger 2003 for agood summary). Some policy problems arean effect <strong>of</strong> unresolved struggles for authoritybetween formal and <strong>in</strong>formal tenure<strong>in</strong>stitutions (e.g. state versus chiefdoms <strong>in</strong>areas <strong>of</strong> western and southern Africa), orthey may be caused by excessive state controlover land and other resources (e.g. <strong>in</strong>Ethiopia, Indonesia and the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es), oroverlapp<strong>in</strong>g or conflict<strong>in</strong>g tenure adm<strong>in</strong>istrationacross m<strong>in</strong>istries (<strong>of</strong> lands, agriculture,natural resources, and so on). <strong>The</strong>sesituations contribute to poor formulationand implementation <strong>of</strong> tenure policies thatcan particularly affect the property rights<strong>of</strong> women and migrants (or <strong>in</strong> some case<strong>in</strong>digenous peoples). Each <strong>of</strong> these factorsmay have considerable impact on NRM.By <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty over any<strong>in</strong>dividual or group’s claims to the bene<strong>fit</strong>sgenerated by the application <strong>of</strong> resources,these tenure problems reduce <strong>in</strong>centivesfor <strong>in</strong>vestment and management <strong>of</strong> naturalresources.While <strong>in</strong> many areas, <strong>in</strong>digenous tenuresystems <strong>of</strong>fer sufficient <strong>in</strong>centives for <strong>in</strong>vestment<strong>in</strong> land management, there rema<strong>in</strong>some stubborn problems to resolve.As a general pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, the clearer the policiesare (i.e. no overlapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>consistenciesor gaps), the better, all else be<strong>in</strong>g equal.Furthermore, there needs to be functionaland fair property rights enforcement mechanisms<strong>in</strong> place to back up those policies.This calls for local services and for localand national adm<strong>in</strong>istration to be l<strong>in</strong>ked.For the specific tenure problems that exist,transparent resolution processes need tobe developed, substantiated by scientific<strong>in</strong>formation about the desirability <strong>of</strong> anyspecific new tenure arrangement.One lesson that has been learned fromrecent reforms is that national policy alonewill not necessarily lead to tenure changeon the ground (for example, with respectto women’s rights; Razawi 2003). Suchchange also requires <strong>in</strong>terventions on a localscale, which may <strong>in</strong>clude policies butwill also need such <strong>in</strong>stitutional reforms asa fairer judicial system and technological<strong>in</strong>terventions such as practices that womenwill use. Also because tenure systems andtenure security respond to driv<strong>in</strong>g forces,<strong>in</strong>direct policies (e.g. on market liberalization)may lead to desired tenure changes <strong>in</strong>tenure <strong>in</strong>stitutions.Land/soil management policyLand management policy is <strong>of</strong>ten the amalgamation<strong>of</strong> dozens <strong>of</strong> laws and hundreds<strong>of</strong> regulations, established by several differentm<strong>in</strong>istries and possibly two or moreadm<strong>in</strong>istration levels. This may be unavoidableto some extent, yet the result is usuallyconflict<strong>in</strong>g policies result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong>clarity at government level and certa<strong>in</strong>ly atthe level <strong>of</strong> land manager. Most countriesare attempt<strong>in</strong>g to consolidate policy mak<strong>in</strong>gby form<strong>in</strong>g Environmental ManagementAuthorities, but they have not been givenample resources to tackle this colossalmandate. Indeed, the natural resources sectoris <strong>of</strong>ten underfunded and must dependlargely on externally funded projects.It is unfortunate that policies concern<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment and welfare goals are <strong>of</strong>tendetached from those focus<strong>in</strong>g on conservationand the environment. This is evident<strong>in</strong> the significant lack <strong>of</strong> attention that ispaid to land and soil management <strong>in</strong> thepoverty reduction strategy papers (PRSPs)<strong>of</strong> African nations, such as Burk<strong>in</strong>a Faso,
Chapter 8: Policies for improved land management <strong>in</strong> smallholder agriculture75the Democratic Republic <strong>of</strong> Congo, Kenya,Mozambique, Niger, Tanzania and Zambia.To see how this lack <strong>of</strong> clarity affects landmanagement, we can take the example <strong>of</strong>agr<strong>of</strong>orestry. Land and tree property rights,which affect agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong>centives,are <strong>in</strong>fluenced to some degree bym<strong>in</strong>istries <strong>of</strong> forestry, agriculture, lands,energy and water. In addition, <strong>in</strong> manycountries, there is <strong>in</strong>sufficient dist<strong>in</strong>ctionbetween trees on farms and those <strong>in</strong> forests.Rules and laws are thus made to applyto all trees, and logg<strong>in</strong>g bans and protectedspecies regulations have un<strong>in</strong>tended dis<strong>in</strong>centivesfor farmers to plant and managethe trees on their farms. Agricultural extensionstaff are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly active <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>gagr<strong>of</strong>orestry enterprises for farmers, buttree seed is still ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong>forest departments. At the same time, forestdepartments do not have enough staff to <strong>in</strong>teractsufficiently with farmers. So developmentprogrammes cont<strong>in</strong>ue to struggle tobuild susta<strong>in</strong>able agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems.Thus, the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> land managementneeds to be raised, and new or exist<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>stitutions should become focal po<strong>in</strong>tsor coord<strong>in</strong>ation units for land and soil.<strong>The</strong>y would be responsible for assembl<strong>in</strong>gdatabases on soils, monitor<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong>land resources and champion<strong>in</strong>g improvedland management practices to practitionersand policy units. <strong>The</strong>re are many areas thatrequire attention; here we discuss <strong>in</strong> moredetail some policy reforms that could contributeto improved soil nutrient managementby smallholder farmers.Most countries’ policies on sources andmanagement <strong>of</strong> nutrients require attention.<strong>The</strong> start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t is generally fertilizer prices;<strong>in</strong> a country where markets and <strong>in</strong>frastructurefunction well, the ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>put tooutput prices at the farm is sufficiently lowto attract high demand and use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer.However, <strong>in</strong> much <strong>of</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g worldthese conditions are not met. To encouragethe use <strong>of</strong> fertilizer, governments can try toalter the ratio (e.g. to entice farmers to cultivatehigher-value crops) or try to directly<strong>in</strong>fluence prices (e.g. by subsidiz<strong>in</strong>g fertilizers).Fertilizer subsidization has been tried<strong>in</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong> countries, and rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>place <strong>in</strong> a few. In countries such as Ch<strong>in</strong>aand India fertilizer application rates arevery high – even greater than those <strong>in</strong> somedeveloped countries (FAO 2004), lead<strong>in</strong>gto environmental and human healthconcerns. Several governments that discont<strong>in</strong>uedsubsidies are consider<strong>in</strong>g otheroptions to make fertilizers more attractiveto farmers. Some, such as the governments<strong>of</strong> Malawi and Zambia, have embarked onlimited subsidy programmes that are designedto be small starter kits or targeted tothe poor. In other countries, such as Kenya,fertilizer import taxes have been loweredand competition encouraged so that thereare now many large importers, which reducespr<strong>of</strong>it marg<strong>in</strong>s at the importer level(Jayne et al. 2003). None <strong>of</strong> these policiesby themselves will lead to desirable levels<strong>of</strong> fertilizer use because there are still highpoverty rates coupled with poor rural creditavailability. Thus, the exploration <strong>of</strong> othernutrient sources becomes important.Organic sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients are ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grecognition as not only feasible andappropriate, but necessary <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>situations (Palm et al. 1997; Place et al.2003). Crop–livestock farms are commonthroughout the smallholder sectors <strong>of</strong>develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, but little <strong>of</strong> the manureproduced is used as an <strong>in</strong>put to cropproduction because <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge,lack <strong>of</strong> labour, use <strong>of</strong> manure for energy,and graz<strong>in</strong>g systems that do not favour theconcentration <strong>of</strong> manure near the farms.More attention needs to be paid to manuremanagement and application as well asto the development <strong>of</strong> manure markets. Interms <strong>of</strong> plants, a number <strong>of</strong> herbaceousand woody legumes have been found toproduce large amounts <strong>of</strong> organic matterand certa<strong>in</strong> elements such as nitrogen.Moreover, they are cheap to establish andtherefore attractive to the poor. However,policy makers cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be unaware<strong>of</strong> these systems and thus have not madethem part <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>stream development programmes.In places, such as most <strong>of</strong> sub-Saharan Africa, where multiple constra<strong>in</strong>tsto land <strong>in</strong>vestment exist at community andhousehold levels it is likely that over thenext 10–20 years the use <strong>of</strong> nutrients fromall sources – m<strong>in</strong>eral fertilizers, animalmanure and green biomass – will becomeeven more important.Research and extension policySound agricultural and natural resourceresearch systems have emerged <strong>in</strong> Brazil,Ch<strong>in</strong>a, and India and <strong>in</strong> some <strong>of</strong> theother emerg<strong>in</strong>g nations <strong>of</strong> Asia and SouthAmerica, but rema<strong>in</strong> weak elsewhere. <strong>The</strong>reasons for weak systems are manifold and<strong>in</strong>clude under-appreciation and neglect bygovernment, <strong>in</strong>sufficient external fund<strong>in</strong>g,poor and rigid management, and low staffmotivation. Another criticism <strong>of</strong> researchsystems, especially <strong>in</strong> Africa, is that theydo not <strong>in</strong>tegrate well with extension systems.But sometimes it is the extensionsystems themselves that come under <strong>in</strong>tensivescrut<strong>in</strong>y (<strong>World</strong> Bank 2003). Dissem<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>gnew <strong>in</strong>formation or foster<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>novative processes through technicalsupport are major <strong>challenge</strong>s <strong>in</strong> rural areas<strong>of</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries and are exacerbatedby poor communication <strong>in</strong>frastructure,multiplicity <strong>of</strong> languages and high levels <strong>of</strong>illiteracy. <strong>The</strong> poorer countries have beenunable to susta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> extensionsystems lead<strong>in</strong>g to failures and calls forchange.
- Page 4 and 5:
CitationGarrity, D., A. Okono, M. G
- Page 6 and 7:
Enhancing Environmental ServicesCha
- Page 8 and 9:
viWorld Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 10 and 11:
viiiWorld Agroforestry into the Fut
- Page 13 and 14:
Agroforestry and the Future
- Page 15 and 16:
Keywords:Millennium Development Goa
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 21 and 22:
Trees and Markets
- Page 23 and 24:
Keywords:Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 35 and 36: Keywords:Perennial tree crops, plan
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 47: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 50 and 51: 38World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 52 and 53: 40World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 54 and 55: “Trees influence landscape scaled
- Page 56 and 57: 44World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 58 and 59: 46World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 60 and 61: 48World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 62 and 63: 50World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 65 and 66: Keywords:Agroforestry, improved fal
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 73 and 74: Keywords:Extension, farmer-centred
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 83 and 84: Keywords:Policy, land management, a
- Page 85: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 9Land and People:Working Gr
- Page 93: Chapter 9: Land and people81• sca
- Page 96 and 97: “Forest conservation is no longer
- Page 98 and 99: 86World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 100 and 101: 88World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 102 and 103: 90World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 104 and 105: 92World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 106 and 107: 94World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 108 and 109: 96World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 110 and 111: 98World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 112 and 113: 100World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 115 and 116: Keywords:Agroforestry, buffering wa
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 125 and 126: Keywords:Agroforestry, vulnerabilit
- Page 127 and 128: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 129 and 130: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 133: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 136 and 137:
124World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 138 and 139:
126World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 140 and 141:
“Agroforestry can and does playa
- Page 142 and 143:
130World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 144 and 145:
132World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 147 and 148:
Keywords:Educational impact, sustai
- Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 153 and 154:
Keywords:Networking, research-exten
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 159 and 160:
Keywords:Capacity building, agrofor
- Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 165 and 166:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 167 and 168:
Keywords:E-learning, agricultural e
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 20Strengthening Institution
- Page 177:
Chapter 20: Strengthening instituti
- Page 180 and 181:
168“The biological characteristic
- Page 182 and 183:
170World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 184 and 185:
172World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 186 and 187:
174World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 188 and 189:
176World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 190 and 191:
178World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 192 and 193:
180World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 194 and 195:
182World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 196 and 197:
184World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 198 and 199:
186World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 200 and 201:
188World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 202 and 203:
190World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 205 and 206:
Author ContactsFahmudin Agusisri@in
- Page 207 and 208:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsACIARAFTP
- Page 210:
CreditsFront cover photo: Karen Rob
- Page 213:
World Agroforestry into the Future