26<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the Futurewith regional and <strong>in</strong>ternational markets.Wealth created <strong>in</strong> this way generally hasa multiplier effect that improves the entirelocal economy and can also bene<strong>fit</strong> the nationalcommunity.Moreover, several studies have shown thatthere is rarely any real competition betweenfood crops and perennial tree crops. Foodsecurity is generally better <strong>in</strong> perennial treecrop zones than elsewhere (Krueger andBerg 2002). However, there are still risks<strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g tree crops for a livelihood, particularlywhen there is centralized control<strong>of</strong> tree crop markets that also extends tomarket and extension systems for food cropsgrown by the same farmers. If the marketfor tree products decl<strong>in</strong>es then the wholerural <strong>in</strong>frastructure may decl<strong>in</strong>e, as was thecase dur<strong>in</strong>g the cocoa crisis <strong>in</strong> Cameroon <strong>in</strong>the early 1990s and the more recent c<strong>of</strong>feecrisis <strong>in</strong> Kenya (Rice 2003; Ruf 1995) Treecrops have a considerable impact on landtenure. In societies where land ownershipis communal or customary, the perennialnature <strong>of</strong> the crops <strong>in</strong>troduces pr<strong>of</strong>oundchanges <strong>in</strong> land distribution, hence <strong>in</strong> socialrelations because plantations tend to beowned by <strong>in</strong>dividuals or families rather thancollectively. Clear<strong>in</strong>g land for plantations isan important avenue for secur<strong>in</strong>g tenure <strong>in</strong>areas with little formal land registration.<strong>The</strong> fact that tree crops are at the heart <strong>of</strong>changes <strong>in</strong> social and territorial structuresis only just beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to be realized <strong>in</strong>some countries. “Tree crops have gonehand-<strong>in</strong>-hand with a territorializationprocess,” commented Charlery de laMasselière at Yamoussoukro (Charleryde la Masselière 2001).Many different k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> social or trad<strong>in</strong>gnetworks may be established or transformedbecause <strong>of</strong> tree crops. <strong>The</strong> qualityand nature <strong>of</strong> such networks is a decisiveelement <strong>in</strong> how well tree crops can contributeto susta<strong>in</strong>able community development.In many countries <strong>in</strong> the past, farmerscould not realize the bene<strong>fit</strong>s <strong>of</strong> theirwork ow<strong>in</strong>g to state and parastatal control<strong>of</strong> market cha<strong>in</strong>s. Policies such as thosecontroll<strong>in</strong>g taxation, extension, ‘forcedcooperation’ and farmers’ organizationsweakened the ability <strong>of</strong> farmers to improvetheir market position and hence alleviatepoverty. Those who bene<strong>fit</strong>ed the mostwere the early adopters and landowners,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those who rented out land toothers and made a liv<strong>in</strong>g from the pr<strong>of</strong>its(Berry 1975). Ow<strong>in</strong>g to this history, deregulationhas not helped because farmers arenot well organized to deal with large-scale,private-sector actors.Environmental importanceFor a long time, tree crop plantations wereextended by clear<strong>in</strong>g forest on pioneerfronts, i.e. areas with low land occupationpressure that are therefore cheaper. Thiscontributed to deforestation, but at a timewhen environmental concerns were not apriority.S<strong>in</strong>ce the Rio Summit <strong>in</strong> 1992, environmentalconcerns have been acknowledgedas <strong>in</strong>tegral components <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>abledevelopment. Faced with the threat <strong>of</strong>depletion <strong>of</strong> primary forests, land that hasalready been cultivated needs to be replanted.Perennial tree crops are forest-typecultivated ecosystems that can constitutesusta<strong>in</strong>able systems:• <strong>The</strong>y help to protect exist<strong>in</strong>g forests bysupply<strong>in</strong>g wood for <strong>in</strong>dustry and energy.For example, <strong>in</strong> Sri Lanka “perennialcrop-based farm<strong>in</strong>g systems supply over50% <strong>of</strong> national timber and 80% <strong>of</strong> thefuelwood needs”, (Pushpakumara 2001).• <strong>The</strong>y make a substantial contributiontowards carbon sequestration. For example,rubber trees can sequester morethan 100 tonnes <strong>of</strong> carbon per hectareover 33 years (Hamel and Eschbach2001).• <strong>The</strong> permanent cover and fairly systematicuse <strong>of</strong> cover crops effectively protectssoil from erosion. “A well-managedtea plantation results <strong>in</strong> an annual [soil]loss <strong>of</strong> only 0.24 t ha –1 , compared with25–100 t ha –1 for vegetables, potatoesand tobacco, and 0.3 t ha –1 for denseforest,” (Kaosa-ard and Rerkasem 1999).• Soil cover also reduces the risk <strong>of</strong> leach<strong>in</strong>g,and legumes – <strong>of</strong>ten associated withtree crops – help to improve the nitrogenbalance.• Use <strong>of</strong> pesticides is limited: either theyare not necessary or farmers cannotafford them.• It is possible to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a degree <strong>of</strong>diversity <strong>in</strong> multi-storey plots such asthose for ‘jungle rubber’ <strong>in</strong> Indonesia,cocoa agr<strong>of</strong>orests <strong>in</strong> Cameroon and<strong>in</strong>tercropped c<strong>of</strong>fee <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia, Indiaand Indonesia• Most perennial crops are less sensitive t<strong>of</strong>ertility levels than food crops, and some<strong>of</strong> them can help to stabilize the agroecology<strong>of</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>al or degraded lands.In Central America, Arabica c<strong>of</strong>fee treeshelp to fix many fragile mounta<strong>in</strong> soils.While these are positive aspects <strong>of</strong> tree cropsystems, conservation biologists warn thateven complex tree crop/agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systemsare not equivalent to natural forests.Furthermore, farm <strong>in</strong>puts such as pesticides,particularly the copper-based fungicidesused on cocoa, can harm other species. Treecrop plantations can encroach significantlyon protected areas (e.g. the cocoa be<strong>in</strong>gplanted with<strong>in</strong> Lore L<strong>in</strong>du Park <strong>in</strong> Sulawesi,Indonesia; Schroth et al. 2004).
Chapter 3: <strong>The</strong> future <strong>of</strong> perennial tree crops27When managed <strong>in</strong> smallholder plantations,<strong>in</strong>dividual agr<strong>of</strong>orestry patches <strong>of</strong>tenbecome fragmented mak<strong>in</strong>g it harder toreta<strong>in</strong> a work<strong>in</strong>g ecosystem. Recent th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> conservation science calls for waysto connect forest patches and smallholdertree crop/agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems with largerprotected forests to boost the conservationbene<strong>fit</strong>s to the landscape scale. <strong>The</strong>re arenumerous <strong>challenge</strong>s to these proposals<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the spread <strong>of</strong> diseases, pesticideuse and the effects <strong>of</strong> animals on crops (seecase studies <strong>in</strong> Schroth et al. 2004).Tree crops with<strong>in</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestrysystemsAccord<strong>in</strong>g to ICRAF, “Our vision is anagr<strong>of</strong>orestry transformation <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>gworld, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a massive <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g trees on work<strong>in</strong>glandscapes by smallholder rural householdsthat helps ensure security <strong>of</strong> food,nutrition, <strong>in</strong>come, health, shelter and energyand a regenerated environment” (<strong>World</strong>Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Centre 2005). This all-embrac<strong>in</strong>gdef<strong>in</strong>ition means that, <strong>in</strong> many cases,perennial tree crops can be consideredto be agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems; they providemany <strong>of</strong> the services identified by ICRAFas be<strong>in</strong>g relevant, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>in</strong>come generation,soil fertility enhancement, carbonsequestration, weed control, microclimateimprovement and reclamation <strong>of</strong> degradedlands. Even the most complex and diversetree crop/agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gthe jungle rubber systems <strong>in</strong> Indonesia, aregenerally not very <strong>in</strong>tensive and are <strong>of</strong>tenlow-yield<strong>in</strong>g, usually because <strong>of</strong> a lack<strong>of</strong> high-yield<strong>in</strong>g varieties or appropriatecultural techniques. While some agr<strong>of</strong>orestrysystems, such as shade c<strong>of</strong>fee, canbe extremely efficient, knowledge <strong>of</strong> themechanisms that govern these systems andthe ideal crop comb<strong>in</strong>ations rema<strong>in</strong> highlyspecific to each region, limit<strong>in</strong>g the possibilities<strong>of</strong> shar<strong>in</strong>g results between regions.If these systems are to be improved susta<strong>in</strong>ably,their assets – such as the environmentaland biodiversity bene<strong>fit</strong>s, risk-shar<strong>in</strong>gand labour use – need to be promotedand improved. Similarly, their weaknesses,which are primarily <strong>of</strong> a technical or economicnature relat<strong>in</strong>g to low productivityand quality <strong>of</strong> the products, need to be addressed.Challenges to tree cropsystemsDespite the undeniable advantages <strong>of</strong>feredby perennial tree crops, there are concernsabout the role they should play <strong>in</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>abledevelopment. Price <strong>in</strong>stability, market<strong>in</strong>efficiencies, difficulties <strong>in</strong> diversify<strong>in</strong>g,gaps <strong>in</strong> commodity cha<strong>in</strong> organization,problems <strong>in</strong> renew<strong>in</strong>g the means <strong>of</strong> production,and quality demands are a few<strong>of</strong> the problems that need to be dealt withwhen consider<strong>in</strong>g their future.Variability <strong>in</strong> prices and market<strong>in</strong>efficienciesVariability <strong>in</strong> commodity prices is one<strong>of</strong> the most serious risk factors for thefuture <strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> commodity cha<strong>in</strong>s (Ruf1995). Perennial tree crops underwent theirgreatest crisis <strong>in</strong> the 1990s when tropicalFigure 1. Commodity prices trends 1960–2004.2000150010005000Source: <strong>World</strong> Bank 2005.agricultural prices decl<strong>in</strong>ed (Figure 1). Overthe present decade, countries also shiftedemphasis between the crops they weregrow<strong>in</strong>g (Table 3). At the end <strong>of</strong> this period,copra was trad<strong>in</strong>g at around US$200 pertonne and palm oil was between US$250and US$300 per tonne, i.e. around thesame level as <strong>in</strong> the 1960s. Given that theAmerican price <strong>in</strong>dex had risen five-fold<strong>in</strong> that time, <strong>in</strong> real terms copra and palmoil prices were a fifth <strong>of</strong> their 1960s value(<strong>World</strong> Bank 2005)While market prices have improved forproducts such as cocoa, rubber and oil,the gap between prices paid by end usersand those paid to producers is widen<strong>in</strong>g(Oxfam 2002). In the case <strong>of</strong> c<strong>of</strong>fee, forwhich prices have rema<strong>in</strong>ed dramaticallylow, price weakness is comb<strong>in</strong>ed with anextremely volatile market, with fluctuationsdepend<strong>in</strong>g on numerous uncontrollablefactors. <strong>The</strong> mere h<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> a frost forecast <strong>in</strong>Brazil – the world’s lead<strong>in</strong>g producer – cansend c<strong>of</strong>fee prices soar<strong>in</strong>g; a denial a fewweeks later can cause a slump. Similarly,political uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> Côte d’Ivoire arehav<strong>in</strong>g a visible impact on cocoa prices.In order to cope with such variability,stakeholders have attempted to establishCoconutPalm oilCocoaRubberC<strong>of</strong>fee RobustaC<strong>of</strong>fee Arabica1980 1985 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2004
- Page 4 and 5: CitationGarrity, D., A. Okono, M. G
- Page 6 and 7: Enhancing Environmental ServicesCha
- Page 8 and 9: viWorld Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 10 and 11: viiiWorld Agroforestry into the Fut
- Page 13 and 14: Agroforestry and the Future
- Page 15 and 16: Keywords:Millennium Development Goa
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 21 and 22: Trees and Markets
- Page 23 and 24: Keywords:Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 35 and 36: Keywords:Perennial tree crops, plan
- Page 37: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 47: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 50 and 51: 38World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 52 and 53: 40World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 54 and 55: “Trees influence landscape scaled
- Page 56 and 57: 44World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 58 and 59: 46World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 60 and 61: 48World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 62 and 63: 50World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 65 and 66: Keywords:Agroforestry, improved fal
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 73 and 74: Keywords:Extension, farmer-centred
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 83 and 84: Keywords:Policy, land management, a
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 91 and 92:
Chapter 9Land and People:Working Gr
- Page 93:
Chapter 9: Land and people81• sca
- Page 96 and 97:
“Forest conservation is no longer
- Page 98 and 99:
86World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 100 and 101:
88World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 102 and 103:
90World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 104 and 105:
92World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 106 and 107:
94World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 108 and 109:
96World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 110 and 111:
98World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 112 and 113:
100World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 115 and 116:
Keywords:Agroforestry, buffering wa
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 125 and 126:
Keywords:Agroforestry, vulnerabilit
- Page 127 and 128:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 129 and 130:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 133:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 136 and 137:
124World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 138 and 139:
126World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 140 and 141:
“Agroforestry can and does playa
- Page 142 and 143:
130World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 144 and 145:
132World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 147 and 148:
Keywords:Educational impact, sustai
- Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 153 and 154:
Keywords:Networking, research-exten
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 159 and 160:
Keywords:Capacity building, agrofor
- Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 165 and 166:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 167 and 168:
Keywords:E-learning, agricultural e
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 20Strengthening Institution
- Page 177:
Chapter 20: Strengthening instituti
- Page 180 and 181:
168“The biological characteristic
- Page 182 and 183:
170World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 184 and 185:
172World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 186 and 187:
174World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 188 and 189:
176World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 190 and 191:
178World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 192 and 193:
180World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 194 and 195:
182World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 196 and 197:
184World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 198 and 199:
186World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 200 and 201:
188World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 202 and 203:
190World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 205 and 206:
Author ContactsFahmudin Agusisri@in
- Page 207 and 208:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsACIARAFTP
- Page 210:
CreditsFront cover photo: Karen Rob
- Page 213:
World Agroforestry into the Future