66<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the Futureproject is to loan seed to farmers <strong>in</strong> returnfor a promise to give back double theamount they took. <strong>The</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>of</strong> thissystem is uncerta<strong>in</strong>; no private seed dealershave yet emerged, despite the wide-scaleadoption <strong>of</strong> improved fallows.In the expansion <strong>of</strong> Landcare, hundreds<strong>of</strong> communal and private <strong>in</strong>dividual treenurseries have been established to provideseedl<strong>in</strong>gs for fruit and timber species. InLantapan, farmers organized themselvesto create the Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Tree Seed Association<strong>of</strong> Lantapan (ATSAL), a farmeroperatedseed collection, production,process<strong>in</strong>g and market<strong>in</strong>g association. <strong>The</strong>organization has tra<strong>in</strong>ed more than a thousandfarmers <strong>in</strong> both exotic and <strong>in</strong>digenoustree species and has extended its operationsto other areas <strong>of</strong> the country.Market<strong>in</strong>gL<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g farmers to markets and add<strong>in</strong>g valueto raw products have great potential forimprov<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>comes <strong>of</strong> smallholders andfacilitat<strong>in</strong>g the scal<strong>in</strong>g up process (Deweesand Scherr 1996). All three <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong>practices promoted <strong>in</strong> the case studiesproduce <strong>in</strong>puts: fodder for <strong>in</strong>creased milkproduction, and soil erosion control andsoil fertility for crop production. However,only one <strong>of</strong> them, fodder, can be sold, expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gthe relatively low emphasis givento market<strong>in</strong>g and product transformation <strong>in</strong>the case studies. Nevertheless, the uptake<strong>of</strong> the new practices depends on the availability<strong>of</strong> markets for the f<strong>in</strong>al products.As mentioned above, efforts are needed <strong>in</strong>all three cases to promote the market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>seed and seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. Moreover, there are alsooptions for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> fodderfrom shrubs, which could be promotedas a cash crop for farmers who do not ownlivestock. In Kenya, there is also great potentialfor sell<strong>in</strong>g leaf meal as a prote<strong>in</strong> sourceto millers produc<strong>in</strong>g dairy concentrates,who currently import prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong>fish meal, soybeans and cottonseed cake.For thousands <strong>of</strong> low-<strong>in</strong>come farmers <strong>in</strong> thePhilipp<strong>in</strong>es, the NVS system has evolvedas a means to graduate from subsistencemaize farm<strong>in</strong>g to cash cropp<strong>in</strong>g. Claveriais well connected by road to the large portcity <strong>of</strong> Cagayan de Oro, open<strong>in</strong>g up potentialmarkets for a range <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestryproducts. NVS adopters <strong>in</strong> Claveria arenow observed to be grow<strong>in</strong>g a wide range<strong>of</strong> timber and fruit trees and are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glyexpress<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> backyard livestockenterprises to diversify and stabilize their<strong>in</strong>comes. Market access has been criticalfor the <strong>in</strong>tensification and diversification <strong>of</strong>the NVS system.Policy optionsPolicy affects scal<strong>in</strong>g up operations <strong>in</strong> severaldifferent ways: policy constra<strong>in</strong>ts maylimit adoption <strong>of</strong> new practices, policy<strong>in</strong>centives help promote adoption, andpolicy makers themselves may be engagedto promote or even f<strong>in</strong>ance scal<strong>in</strong>g upactivities – a relatively untapped resource(Raussen et al. 2001).In Zambia, local leaders played importantroles <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g improved fallows <strong>in</strong>two ways. Firstly they helped sensitize andmobilize their constituents to plant improvedfallows. Secondly, they passed, and<strong>in</strong> some cases, promoted the enforcement<strong>of</strong> bylaws to remove two <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> constra<strong>in</strong>tsto agr<strong>of</strong>orestry adoption: the sett<strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> uncontrolled fires and free graz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>livestock (Ajayi et al. 2002).<strong>The</strong> Landcare movement has bene<strong>fit</strong>edfrom and, <strong>in</strong> turn, re<strong>in</strong>forced the Philipp<strong>in</strong>egovernment policy <strong>of</strong> decentralizationand devolution <strong>of</strong> responsibilities to localgovernment. <strong>The</strong> local government units(LGUs) are now seen as important partners<strong>in</strong> local natural resource management<strong>in</strong>itiatives, provid<strong>in</strong>g policy support for<strong>in</strong>stitutionaliz<strong>in</strong>g Landcare and conservationfarm<strong>in</strong>g practices, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g staff, andf<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g Landcare activities (Catacutanand Duque 2002; Catacutan et al. 2001).Knowledge, <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g andlearn<strong>in</strong>g from successes and failures<strong>The</strong> dissem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> knowledge and<strong>in</strong>formation about scal<strong>in</strong>g up among stakeholdersis necessary for mak<strong>in</strong>g effectivedecisions. Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation systems,both formal and <strong>in</strong>formal, ensure thegeneration <strong>of</strong> such <strong>in</strong>formation at a range<strong>of</strong> different scales and from the perspectives<strong>of</strong> different stakeholders (Cooper andDenn<strong>in</strong>g 2000).In Kenya and Zambia, monitor<strong>in</strong>g andevaluation have been conducted <strong>in</strong> severaldifferent ways. Village workshops enabledresearchers to ga<strong>in</strong> an up-front understand<strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> farmers’ assessments and expectations<strong>of</strong> the technologies they are us<strong>in</strong>g. Inboth Zambia and Kenya, Centre staff andpartners engage <strong>in</strong> collaborative monitor<strong>in</strong>gand evaluation. <strong>The</strong>se studies <strong>in</strong>cludeeconomic analyses, impact assessmentsand assess<strong>in</strong>g factors affect<strong>in</strong>g adoption.<strong>The</strong> system <strong>in</strong> both countries is not withoutproblems, not all organizations <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>scal<strong>in</strong>g up participate and some are unableto collect even the m<strong>in</strong>imum data required.But the collaborative mechanism givespartners a greater sense <strong>of</strong> ownership andbuy-<strong>in</strong> as well as access to more <strong>in</strong>formationand feedback (Nanok 2003).Knowledge shar<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g are prioritiesat all three sites. As highlightedearlier, Landcare groups have proved to bean effective vehicle for knowledge shar<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> conservation farm<strong>in</strong>g andlivelihood improvement. This <strong>in</strong>stitutional
Chapter 7: Scal<strong>in</strong>g up the impact <strong>of</strong> agr<strong>of</strong>orestry67platform for knowledge shar<strong>in</strong>g is especiallyvaluable <strong>in</strong> heterogeneous biophysicalenvironments and dynamic local economieswhere farm<strong>in</strong>g systems are constantlyevolv<strong>in</strong>g.Strategic partnerships andfacilitationWhen scal<strong>in</strong>g up, partnerships <strong>of</strong>fer highpotential bene<strong>fit</strong>s. Organizations with complementarystrengths, resources and ‘reach’can improve the efficiency and effectiveness<strong>of</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g up efforts (Cooper andDenn<strong>in</strong>g 2000). However, these need tobe weighted aga<strong>in</strong>st such potential risks ashigh costs <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> time and resources,compromised impact, and loss <strong>of</strong> identity(Jacquet de Haveskercke et al. 2003).Landcare <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es is based on astrategic partnership <strong>of</strong> farmers, LGUs andtechnical facilitators (such as ICRAF andgovernment l<strong>in</strong>e agencies). <strong>The</strong>se alliancesare an important aspect <strong>of</strong> the Landcaremovement as they strengthen the <strong>in</strong>fluence<strong>of</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g communities on policy formulationand resource allocation decisions.One concern is that ICRAF cont<strong>in</strong>ues toplay a seem<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>dispensable role <strong>in</strong> facilitation;more effort is needed to developlocal skills, preferably <strong>in</strong> the community orwith NGOs that have a long-term commitmentto the local communities.Conclusions: Research<strong>challenge</strong>s<strong>The</strong> review <strong>of</strong> the three case studieshighlights the fact that there is no s<strong>in</strong>glerecipe for scal<strong>in</strong>g up (Table 1). Differentapproaches can all be successful, depend<strong>in</strong>gon the <strong>in</strong>novation, the environment andthe resources at hand. <strong>The</strong> key elementscontribut<strong>in</strong>g to improved impact <strong>in</strong> the casestudies were: tak<strong>in</strong>g a farmer-centred researchand extension approach; provid<strong>in</strong>g arange <strong>of</strong> technical options; build<strong>in</strong>g local <strong>in</strong>stitutionalcapacity; shar<strong>in</strong>g knowledge and<strong>in</strong>formation; learn<strong>in</strong>g from successes andfailures; and creat<strong>in</strong>g strategic partnershipsand facilitation. Three other elements areimportant for scal<strong>in</strong>g up: market<strong>in</strong>g, systems<strong>of</strong> germplasm production and distribution,and policy options, but the performance <strong>of</strong>the cases on these was, at best, mixed.Although the facilitators <strong>in</strong> the three casestudies used many <strong>of</strong> the same elements,their scal<strong>in</strong>g up strategies were very different.<strong>The</strong> case <strong>of</strong> fodder shrubs <strong>in</strong> Kenya<strong>of</strong>fers the simplest approach, <strong>in</strong> which afocus on on-farm research and facilitat<strong>in</strong>gextension services, NGOs and farmergroups reaped surpris<strong>in</strong>gly high bene<strong>fit</strong>s.Certa<strong>in</strong>ly the limited scope <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>novation– it be<strong>in</strong>g one among several importantmanagement practices <strong>in</strong> the dairyenterprise – prevents certa<strong>in</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g upapproaches from be<strong>in</strong>g used.Table 1.Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry practices, extension strategy, policy options and <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>in</strong>novations promoted <strong>in</strong> the three scal<strong>in</strong>g upcase studies.TechnologyExtensionstrategy Policy options Institutional <strong>in</strong>novationsTypeOrig<strong>in</strong>Facilitat<strong>in</strong>gextensionservices,NGOs,farmergroupsEngag<strong>in</strong>glocalgovernment<strong>in</strong>facilitativeroleObta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>glocalgovernmentf<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>gLobby<strong>in</strong>gfor localpolicychangesLobby<strong>in</strong>g fornational policychangesCapacitybuild<strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> farmergroupsFacilitat<strong>in</strong>gthecreation <strong>of</strong>federations<strong>of</strong> farmergroupsPromot<strong>in</strong>gconsortia<strong>of</strong> partnersFodder shrubs,KenyaResearcherandfarmer-ledtrialsXXImprovedfallows,ZambiaNaturalVegetative Strips/Landcare,the Philipp<strong>in</strong>esResearcherandfarmer-ledtrialsFarmer<strong>in</strong>novationwith research<strong>in</strong>putsX X X X XX X X X X X X X
- Page 4 and 5:
CitationGarrity, D., A. Okono, M. G
- Page 6 and 7:
Enhancing Environmental ServicesCha
- Page 8 and 9:
viWorld Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 10 and 11:
viiiWorld Agroforestry into the Fut
- Page 13 and 14:
Agroforestry and the Future
- Page 15 and 16:
Keywords:Millennium Development Goa
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 21 and 22:
Trees and Markets
- Page 23 and 24:
Keywords:Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 35 and 36: Keywords:Perennial tree crops, plan
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 47: Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 50 and 51: 38World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 52 and 53: 40World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 54 and 55: “Trees influence landscape scaled
- Page 56 and 57: 44World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 58 and 59: 46World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 60 and 61: 48World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 62 and 63: 50World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 65 and 66: Keywords:Agroforestry, improved fal
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 73 and 74: Keywords:Extension, farmer-centred
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 77: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 83 and 84: Keywords:Policy, land management, a
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 9Land and People:Working Gr
- Page 93: Chapter 9: Land and people81• sca
- Page 96 and 97: “Forest conservation is no longer
- Page 98 and 99: 86World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 100 and 101: 88World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 102 and 103: 90World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 104 and 105: 92World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 106 and 107: 94World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 108 and 109: 96World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 110 and 111: 98World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 112 and 113: 100World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 115 and 116: Keywords:Agroforestry, buffering wa
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 125 and 126: Keywords:Agroforestry, vulnerabilit
- Page 127 and 128: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 129 and 130:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 133:
Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 136 and 137:
124World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 138 and 139:
126World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 140 and 141:
“Agroforestry can and does playa
- Page 142 and 143:
130World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 144 and 145:
132World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 147 and 148:
Keywords:Educational impact, sustai
- Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 153 and 154:
Keywords:Networking, research-exten
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 159 and 160:
Keywords:Capacity building, agrofor
- Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 165 and 166:
Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 167 and 168:
Keywords:E-learning, agricultural e
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 20Strengthening Institution
- Page 177:
Chapter 20: Strengthening instituti
- Page 180 and 181:
168“The biological characteristic
- Page 182 and 183:
170World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 184 and 185:
172World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 186 and 187:
174World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 188 and 189:
176World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 190 and 191:
178World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 192 and 193:
180World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 194 and 195:
182World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 196 and 197:
184World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 198 and 199:
186World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 200 and 201:
188World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 202 and 203:
190World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 205 and 206:
Author ContactsFahmudin Agusisri@in
- Page 207 and 208:
Acronyms and AbbreviationsACIARAFTP
- Page 210:
CreditsFront cover photo: Karen Rob
- Page 213:
World Agroforestry into the Future