13.07.2015 Views

The challenge of HIV/AIDS: Where does agroforestry fit in? - World ...

The challenge of HIV/AIDS: Where does agroforestry fit in? - World ...

The challenge of HIV/AIDS: Where does agroforestry fit in? - World ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the Futureto agr<strong>of</strong>orestry and natural resources management<strong>in</strong>novations, because they arerelatively ‘knowledge <strong>in</strong>tensive’ and, unlikeGreen Revolution technologies, may notspread easily on their own. Draw<strong>in</strong>g on arange <strong>of</strong> expertise, Cooper and Denn<strong>in</strong>g(2000) identified 10 essential elementsfor scal<strong>in</strong>g up agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>novations:farmer-centred research and extension approaches,technology options, build<strong>in</strong>glocal capacity, germplasm, market options,policy options, knowledge and <strong>in</strong>formationshar<strong>in</strong>g, learn<strong>in</strong>g from successes and failures,strategic partnerships, and facilitation(Figure 1).<strong>The</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this chapter is to assessrecent lessons learned <strong>in</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g upagr<strong>of</strong>orestry bene<strong>fit</strong>s, draw<strong>in</strong>g on threeStrategicpartnershipsLearn<strong>in</strong>g fromsuccess andfailurescase studies <strong>in</strong> Kenya, Zambia, and thePhilipp<strong>in</strong>es. Two <strong>of</strong> these, from Kenya andthe Philipp<strong>in</strong>es, were reported <strong>in</strong> Franzelet al. (2001a), but this chapter will showimportant developments s<strong>in</strong>ce then. Firstly,concepts and def<strong>in</strong>itions <strong>of</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g up arereviewed. Secondly, the case studies arepresented, followed by a discussion <strong>of</strong>their use <strong>of</strong> the 10 fundamental elements.F<strong>in</strong>ally, conclusions are drawn andresearch <strong>challenge</strong>s are discussed.Scal<strong>in</strong>g up: Def<strong>in</strong>itions andconcepts<strong>The</strong>re is a proliferation <strong>of</strong> terms to describescal<strong>in</strong>g up (Gündel et al. 2001; Uv<strong>in</strong>and Miller 1996). For <strong>in</strong>stance, Uv<strong>in</strong> andMiller’s typology <strong>in</strong>volves 17 differentAvailablegermplasmsk<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g up, focus<strong>in</strong>g variously onstructure, when a programme expandsits size; strategy or degree <strong>of</strong> political<strong>in</strong>volvement; and resource base, referr<strong>in</strong>gto organizational strength.In this chapter we follow Gündel et al.(2001), who adopt the IIRR (2000) def<strong>in</strong>ition<strong>of</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g up, which notes that the‘scaled-up state’ can either occur spontaneouslyor because <strong>of</strong> the deliberate, plannedefforts <strong>of</strong> governments, non-governmentalorganizations (NGOs) or other changeagents. Much can be learned from study<strong>in</strong>ghow spontaneous dissem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>novations takes place, and <strong>in</strong> particularthe role <strong>of</strong> farmer-to-farmer dissem<strong>in</strong>ation.Scal<strong>in</strong>g up is a communication process,and change agents have to understand howfarmers receive, analyse, and dissem<strong>in</strong>ate<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> order to facilitate it. <strong>The</strong>re isemerg<strong>in</strong>g literature on agricultural knowledgeand <strong>in</strong>formation systems, explor<strong>in</strong>ghow those <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the creation <strong>of</strong> agriculturalknowledge acquire, transmit andexchange <strong>in</strong>formation (Garforth 2001).MarketoptionsTechnologyoptionsCase studies from Kenya,Zambia, and the Philipp<strong>in</strong>esPolicyoptionsFacilitationFigure 1. Essential elements for scal<strong>in</strong>g up agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>novations.Source: Cooper and Denn<strong>in</strong>g (2000).SCALING UPAGROFORESTRYINNOVATIONSLocal<strong>in</strong>stitutionalcapacityKnowledge/<strong>in</strong>formationshar<strong>in</strong>gFarmer-centredresearch andextensionapproaches1. Fodder shrubs, Kenya<strong>The</strong> low quality and quantity <strong>of</strong> feedresources is a major constra<strong>in</strong>t to dairyfarm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> central Kenya. Most farmersalso grow Napier grass as fodder, but it is<strong>in</strong>sufficient <strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> and the daily yield<strong>of</strong> cows fed on it is only around 8 litres.Commercial dairy meal is available butfarmers consider it expensive and mostdo not use it (Franzel et al. 2003).Development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>novationIn the early 1990s, researchers (from theKenya Agricultural Research Institute –KARI, the Kenya Forestry Research Institute

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!