156<strong>World</strong> Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry <strong>in</strong>to the Futureare prov<strong>in</strong>g successful <strong>in</strong> developed countries,problems with communications <strong>in</strong>frastructureand access to computer facilitieshave made this approach more difficult <strong>in</strong>develop<strong>in</strong>g countries. This chapter highlightssome <strong>of</strong> the difficulties and takes a criticallook at the new CGIAR approaches towardsbuild<strong>in</strong>g capacity and strengthen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutionsus<strong>in</strong>g electronic-based ICT.ICT <strong>in</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and educationWhen consider<strong>in</strong>g ICT, experienced educatorsknow that the characteristics <strong>of</strong> theaudience for whom the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is targetedand the content <strong>of</strong> the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, (for <strong>in</strong>stance,will it close the knowledge gap?)are more important than the technologythat delivers the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. For over 50 years,tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>essionals have relied on the<strong>in</strong>struction systems process as a guid<strong>in</strong>gmethod for design<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (see Figure 3).organizations resembles that <strong>of</strong> corporations<strong>in</strong> 2000/01. John Chambers, President<strong>of</strong> Cisco Systems Inc. claimed <strong>in</strong> 1999that “the next big killer application for theInternet is go<strong>in</strong>g to be education. Educationover the Internet is go<strong>in</strong>g to be so bigit is go<strong>in</strong>g to make e-mail usage look like a‘round<strong>in</strong>g error’ <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> the Internet capacityit will consume” (Chambers 1999).So what happened? Figure 1 highlights thecorporate e-learn<strong>in</strong>g experience from 1996to 2003.When the ‘dot com’ bust occurred <strong>in</strong> 2001,corporations began to realize that their corporateuniversity <strong>in</strong>vestments were not provid<strong>in</strong>ga good return and they started to dissolvethe mechanisms. With<strong>in</strong> six months,Electronic Data Systems, one <strong>of</strong> the world’slargest ICT service providers, cut their corporateuniversity from 245 staff to 25.Kruse (2003) states: “<strong>The</strong>n 2001 broughtthe harsh, steep slope <strong>of</strong> unfulfilled promises.Several high-pr<strong>of</strong>ile providers shuttheir doors while many more announcedlarge-scale lay<strong>of</strong>fs <strong>in</strong> the face <strong>of</strong> missedrevenue targets and crash<strong>in</strong>g stock prices.E-learn<strong>in</strong>g advocates retreated to the moredefensible ground <strong>of</strong> ‘blended learn<strong>in</strong>g.’”<strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> Bank’s 1999 <strong>World</strong> DevelopmentReport suggested that advances <strong>in</strong> electronicand computer-based ICT would allow ‘unprecedentedopportunities’ for the world’spoor. “Advances <strong>in</strong> communications havetransformed society before: movable type,photography and telegraphy, the telephone,television, and the fax mach<strong>in</strong>e have allpushed outward the limits <strong>of</strong> our ability tostore and transmit knowledge. Now theconverg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> comput<strong>in</strong>g and telecommunicationsappears ready to shatter those limits,Information and communication technologyis not new, nor is it limited to transferr<strong>in</strong>glarge amounts <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation at the speed<strong>of</strong> light across the Internet. Essentially, ICTis any technology that transmits <strong>in</strong>formation– whether it is cave pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs, smokesignals, kites, books, CD-ROMs, television,radio, or computers and the Internet. “Itis an expand<strong>in</strong>g assembly <strong>of</strong> technologiesthat can be used to collect, store and share<strong>in</strong>formation between people us<strong>in</strong>g multipledevices and multiple media” (Chapman andSlaymaker 2002). Despite the broad def<strong>in</strong>ition<strong>of</strong> ICT, we focus on advances <strong>in</strong> electronicand computer-based ICT here.Development organizations work<strong>in</strong>g to improveaccess to <strong>in</strong>formation and educationseem to be <strong>in</strong>trigued by the possibilities <strong>of</strong>ICT and there are good levels <strong>of</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>gfor ICT-driven capacity-build<strong>in</strong>g projects.It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that the pattern <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> e-learn<strong>in</strong>g from developmentVISIBILITYE-LEARNING HYPE CYCLE1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003TechnologytriggerSCORM 1.0 releasedLearn<strong>in</strong>g portal fad beg<strong>in</strong>sAsymetrix becomes Click2Learn.comFocus changes from tools toenterprise wide management systemsMacromediaFlash 1.0NYU Onl<strong>in</strong>e foundedSaba foundedFirst article on“Intranet-based Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g”<strong>in</strong> Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Magaz<strong>in</strong>eOnly one “IBT”session at ASTDCBT Systems becomes SmartforceMasie launchesTechlearn 97Figure 1. E-learn<strong>in</strong>g hype cycle.Peak <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>flatedexpectationsDigitalTh<strong>in</strong>k stock at US$89.44John Chambers declares“E-Learn<strong>in</strong>g is the next killer application”Headlight.com closesPensare closesCaliber closesPeer3 closesFocus on Blended learn<strong>in</strong>gLCMSs emergeNYU Onl<strong>in</strong>e closesSCORM 1.2 releasedSmartForce and Skills<strong>of</strong>tannounce mergerTrough <strong>of</strong>disillusionmentDigitalTh<strong>in</strong>k stock at US$1.34TIMEEnlightenment and productivityNote: Figure illustrates the wave <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest and <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> e-learn<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> acronyms are not relevant <strong>in</strong>this context.Source: www.e-learn<strong>in</strong>gguru.com/articles/hype1_1.htm
Chapter 19: Can e-learn<strong>in</strong>g support agricultural development <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries?157mak<strong>in</strong>g it possible to send vast amounts <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>formation anywhere <strong>in</strong> the world <strong>in</strong> seconds– at an ever-decreas<strong>in</strong>g cost. This newtechnology greatly facilitates the acquisitionand absorption <strong>of</strong> knowledge, <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>gdevelop<strong>in</strong>g countries unprecedented opportunitiesto enhance educational systems,improve policy formation and execution,and widen the range <strong>of</strong> opportunities forbus<strong>in</strong>ess and the poor.” (<strong>World</strong> Bank 1999).While encourag<strong>in</strong>g, the <strong>World</strong> Bank statementplaces a tremendous responsibility oneducators and tra<strong>in</strong>ers. But while the technologywill greatly facilitate <strong>in</strong>formationacquisition, it will do noth<strong>in</strong>g for the ‘absorption<strong>of</strong> knowledge’ if the content is notstructured and organized <strong>in</strong> a mean<strong>in</strong>gfulway. In other words, technology alone <strong>does</strong>not ‘create’ knowledge; it is the quality anddesign <strong>of</strong> the content that matters. Poorlydesigned and structured material deliveredby distance learn<strong>in</strong>g is just as <strong>in</strong>effective aswhen it is delivered face-to-face.Computer and Internet availability, policiesand tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g vary widely throughout Africa.For example, <strong>in</strong> 2001 <strong>in</strong> Kenya 1.6 per cent<strong>of</strong> the total population were Internet users.In Zambia, the figure was less than onepercent (<strong>World</strong> Bank 2002). <strong>The</strong>se figuresare <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rapidly as people realizethe bene<strong>fit</strong>s <strong>of</strong> ICT. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Abdulrazak,Deputy Vice Chancellor <strong>of</strong> Research andExtension at Egerton University <strong>in</strong> Kenyabelieves that “<strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> computer-baseddistance learn<strong>in</strong>g allows greater opportunitiesfor future generations <strong>of</strong> students andfaculty to access and to fully take part <strong>in</strong>the global <strong>in</strong>formation society” (Abdulrazak2004). However, Internet access islimited, at present, to well-resourced, wellfunded<strong>in</strong>stitutions and regions.Table 1 shows that most Internet users are<strong>in</strong> North America, Europe and, to a lesserextent, Asia and the Pacific Rim. Africahas the lowest user numbers, next to Lat<strong>in</strong>America. It also illustrates the large gap betweenusage, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the difficulties associatedwith develop<strong>in</strong>g e-learn<strong>in</strong>g. However,the number <strong>of</strong> users is ris<strong>in</strong>g everywhere.Limited Internet connectivity and bandwidthavailability is a major obstacle to<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g Internet use and e-learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>Africa. Figure 2 shows the connectivity <strong>in</strong>Africa through bits per capita (BPC). Thistakes <strong>in</strong>to consideration the wide range <strong>of</strong>Internet applications available, from personaluse to cybercafes and bus<strong>in</strong>ess transactions.<strong>The</strong> map shows the Internationallevel (bpc) bandwidth available <strong>in</strong> eachAfrican country with the darker shadedcountries hav<strong>in</strong>g the most accessablity andthe lighter shaded countries with the least.<strong>The</strong> high percentage <strong>of</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g Internetand satellite coverage outside <strong>of</strong> Africamakes bandwidth availability expensivebecause <strong>of</strong> the telecommunication and adm<strong>in</strong>istrativeupkeep <strong>of</strong> such a system, andlimits the amount <strong>of</strong> Internet use <strong>in</strong> educationalsett<strong>in</strong>gs. <strong>The</strong> average cost <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g alocal dial-up Internet account for 20 hoursa month <strong>in</strong> Africa is about US$60 (Etta andParvyn Wamahiu 2003).Table 1.Source: Dennis (2000).Despite the technical barriers to computerbasedICT development <strong>in</strong> Africa (and to alesser extent <strong>in</strong> other regions), e-learn<strong>in</strong>gis develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> response to the grow<strong>in</strong>gneed for access to education. Even wherereliable Internet connection is not yet possible,e-learn<strong>in</strong>g is be<strong>in</strong>g developed, basedon the assumption that ICT <strong>in</strong>frastructurewill cont<strong>in</strong>ue to grow <strong>in</strong> the com<strong>in</strong>g years.<strong>The</strong>refore, establish<strong>in</strong>g the theoretical andpedagogical background <strong>in</strong> e-learn<strong>in</strong>g willensure valuable bene<strong>fit</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the future.Figure 2. Internet connectivity <strong>in</strong> Africa.Source: IDRC 2003. For the full colour version<strong>of</strong> this map see http://web.idrc.ca/en/ev-6568-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html.Active adult Internet users aged 14 and over, worldwide (<strong>in</strong> millions).2000 2001 2002 2003 2004North America 97.6 114.4 130.8 147.7 160.6Europe 70.1 107.8 152.7 206.5 254.9Asia and the Pacific Rim 48.7 63.8 85.4 118.8 173.0Lat<strong>in</strong> America 9.9 15.3 22.1 31.0 40.8Africa and the Middle East 3.5 5.3 7.2 9.0 10.9<strong>World</strong>wide total 229.8 306.6 398.2 513.0 640.2
- Page 4 and 5:
CitationGarrity, D., A. Okono, M. G
- Page 6 and 7:
Enhancing Environmental ServicesCha
- Page 8 and 9:
viWorld Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 10 and 11:
viiiWorld Agroforestry into the Fut
- Page 13 and 14:
Agroforestry and the Future
- Page 15 and 16:
Keywords:Millennium Development Goa
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Science-based agroforest
- Page 21 and 22:
Trees and Markets
- Page 23 and 24:
Keywords:Dacryodes edulis, Irvingia
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 2: Trees and markets for ag
- Page 35 and 36:
Keywords:Perennial tree crops, plan
- Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 43 and 44:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 47:
Chapter 3: The future of perennial
- Page 50 and 51:
38World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 52 and 53:
40World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 54 and 55:
“Trees influence landscape scaled
- Page 56 and 57:
44World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 58 and 59:
46World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 60 and 61:
48World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 62 and 63:
50World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 65 and 66:
Keywords:Agroforestry, improved fal
- Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 6: Agroforestry innovations
- Page 73 and 74:
Keywords:Extension, farmer-centred
- Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 7: Scaling up the impact of
- Page 83 and 84:
Keywords:Policy, land management, a
- Page 85 and 86:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 87 and 88:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 8: Policies for improved la
- Page 91 and 92:
Chapter 9Land and People:Working Gr
- Page 93:
Chapter 9: Land and people81• sca
- Page 96 and 97:
“Forest conservation is no longer
- Page 98 and 99:
86World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 100 and 101:
88World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 102 and 103:
90World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 104 and 105:
92World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 106 and 107:
94World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 108 and 109:
96World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 110 and 111:
98World Agroforestry into the Futur
- Page 112 and 113:
100World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 115 and 116:
Keywords:Agroforestry, buffering wa
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 123 and 124: Chapter 12: Watershed functions in
- Page 125 and 126: Keywords:Agroforestry, vulnerabilit
- Page 127 and 128: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 129 and 130: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 133: Chapter 13: Opportunities for linki
- Page 136 and 137: 124World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 138 and 139: 126World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 140 and 141: “Agroforestry can and does playa
- Page 142 and 143: 130World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 144 and 145: 132World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 147 and 148: Keywords:Educational impact, sustai
- Page 149 and 150: Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 151 and 152: Chapter 16: Capacity building in ag
- Page 153 and 154: Keywords:Networking, research-exten
- Page 155 and 156: Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 17: Institutional collabora
- Page 159 and 160: Keywords:Capacity building, agrofor
- Page 161 and 162: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 163 and 164: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 165 and 166: Chapter 18: Building capacity for r
- Page 167: Keywords:E-learning, agricultural e
- Page 171 and 172: Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 173 and 174: Chapter 19: Can e-learning support
- Page 175 and 176: Chapter 20Strengthening Institution
- Page 177: Chapter 20: Strengthening instituti
- Page 180 and 181: 168“The biological characteristic
- Page 182 and 183: 170World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 184 and 185: 172World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 186 and 187: 174World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 188 and 189: 176World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 190 and 191: 178World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 192 and 193: 180World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 194 and 195: 182World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 196 and 197: 184World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 198 and 199: 186World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 200 and 201: 188World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 202 and 203: 190World Agroforestry into the Futu
- Page 205 and 206: Author ContactsFahmudin Agusisri@in
- Page 207 and 208: Acronyms and AbbreviationsACIARAFTP
- Page 210: CreditsFront cover photo: Karen Rob
- Page 213: World Agroforestry into the Future